用户名: 密码: 验证码:
胃上部癌行全胃切除与近端胃切除的临床疗效对比分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparative Analysis of Clinical Effect of Total Gastrectomy and Proximal Gastrectomy in the Treatment of Upper Gastric Cancer
  • 作者:杜青陆
  • 英文作者:DU Qinglu;General Surgery Department, Ulanhot City People's Hospital in Xing'an League;
  • 关键词:胃上部癌 ; 全胃切除术 ; 近端胃切除 ; 临床疗效
  • 英文关键词:Gastric cancer;;Total gastrectomy;;Proximal gastric resection;;Clinical curative effect
  • 中文刊名:JXUY
  • 英文刊名:China Continuing Medical Education
  • 机构:内蒙古兴安盟乌兰浩特市人民医院普外科;
  • 出版日期:2016-10-20
  • 出版单位:中国继续医学教育
  • 年:2016
  • 期:v.8
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:JXUY201629049
  • 页数:2
  • CN:29
  • ISSN:11-5709/R
  • 分类号:80-81
摘要
目的对比胃上部癌行全胃切除与近端胃切除的临床疗效。方法选择2014年1月~2015年12月我院收治的胃上部癌患者98例作为此次研究对象,随机分为对照组与观察组,对照组实施近端胃切除术,观察组实施全胃切除术,对比两组患者临床疗效。结果观察组临床总有效率是93.9%,半年内存活率是85.7%,并发症发生率是16.3%;对照组临床总有效率是77.6%,半年内存活率是67.3%,并发症发生率是36.7%,观察组临床疗效、并发症发生率以及半年内存活率均优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论胃上部癌行全胃切除术的临床疗效要优于行近端胃切除术,且能减少术后并发症。
        Objective To compare the curative effect of gastric resection and proximal gastric resection in upper stomach cancer. Methods 98 cases of upper gastric cancer in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2015 were selected as the study subjects, and randomly divided into control group and observation group, control group received proximal gastrectomy, the observation group received total gastrectomy, clinical curative effect were compared between the two groups. Results The clinical total effective rate in observation group was 93.9%, 0.5 year survival rate was 85.7%, the complication rate was 16.3%, the clinical total effective rate in control group was 77.6%, 0.5 year survival rate was 67.3%, the incidence of complications 36.7%, the clinical efficacy, complication rate and 0.5 year survival rate in observation group were significantly better than the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical curative effect of total gastrectomy for gastric cancer is significantly better than proximal gastrectomy, and can significantly reduce the postoperative complications.
引文
[1]张元军.胃上部癌全胃切除与近端胃切除的对照疗效观察[J].中外医疗,2013,32(2):82,84.
    [2]田君,姚学权,陈彻,等.两种术式对进展期胃上部癌术后辅助化疗耐受性的影响[J].东南大学学报(医学版),2014,33(3):277-282.
    [3]王爱东,谢仁俊,李田刚.近端胃切除和全胃切除对胃上部癌的临床疗效比较[J].现代诊断与治疗,2014,25(16):3659-3660.
    [4]周景新.胃上部癌行全胃切除与近端胃切除的临床效果比照观察[J].中国医药指南,2015,13(27):32-33.
    [5]吴国新,夏勇,黄小芸,等.全胃切除与近端胃切除治疗胃上部癌的临床疗效比较[J].临床医学研究与实践,2016,1(5):23-24.
    [6]李兴禹,席多宏,李青松,等.胃上部癌行全胃切除与近端胃切除的疗效对比[J].中国实用医药,2014,9(10):22-24.
    [7]杨文辉.胃上部癌全胃切除与近端胃切除的对照疗效观察[J].中国实用医刊,2015,42(8):32-33.
    [8]赖光芒,陈志伟,黄宏伟.全胃切除与近端胃切除治疗胃上部癌的临床近期与远期效果比较[J].中国当代医药,2016,23(14):44-46.
    [9]张植木.胃上部癌116例手术治疗分析[J].临床外科杂志,2010,18(2):106-107.
    [10]苏向前,杨宏.腹腔镜辅助近端胃切除的适应证及消化道重建技巧[J].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2014,8(4):16-19.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700