故障树分析法的现状与发展

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：The Status Quo and Development of Fault Tree Analytial Method 作者：郭济鸣 ; 齐金平 ; 李兴运 英文作者：Guo Jiming;Qi Jinping;Li Xingyun; 关键词：故障树 ; 贝叶斯网络 ; 马尔可夫链 ; 发展 ; 综述 英文关键词：Fault Tree;;Bayesian Network;;Markov Chain;;Development;;Overview 中文刊名：ZBJX 英文刊名：The Magazine on Equipment Machinery 机构：兰州交通大学机电技术研究所;甘肃省物流及运输装备信息化工程技术研究中心;甘肃省物流与信息技术研究院; 出版日期：2018-06-30 出版单位：装备机械 年：2018 期：No.164 基金：中国铁路总公司科研计划项目(编号:2015T002-D);; 甘肃省重点研发计划项目(编号:2017GS10888) 语种：中文; 页：ZBJX201802017 页数：6 CN：02 ISSN：31-1892/TH 分类号：65-70

摘要

介绍了故障树分析法在国内外的发展历程,论述了贝叶斯网络法和马尔可夫链法这两种主要故障树分析法的原理,并对两种分析法的优缺点进行了比较。指出了故障树分析法面临的问题和未来的研究方向。
        The development process of fault tree analytical method at home and abroad was inrtoduced, the principles of two main fault tree analytical methods-Bayesian network method and Markov chain method were discussed, the advantages and disadvantages of the two analytical methods, and the problems faced by the fault tree analytical method and future direction in the research were also indicated.

引文

[1]DUGAN J B,BAVUSO S J,BOYD M A.Dynamic Fault-tree Models for Fault-tolerant Computer Systems[J].IEEETransactions on Reliability,1992,41(3):363-377.
    [2]GULATI R,DUGAN J B.A Modular Approach for Analyzing Static and Dynamic Fault Trees[C].Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.1997 Proceedings,Annual,Philadelphia,1997.
    [3]OU Y,DUGAN J B.Approximate Sensitivity Analysis for Acyclic Markov Reliability Models[J].IEEE Transactions on Reliability,2003,52(2):220-230.
    [4]BOUDALI H,CROUZEN P,STOELINGA M.Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis Using Input/Output Interactive Markov Chains[C].Dependable Systems and Networks,2007.DSN’07.37th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on,Edinburgh,2007.
    [5]MARQUEZ D,NEIL M,FENTON N.Solving Dynamic Fault Trees Using A New Hybrid Bayesian Network Inference Algorithm[C].Control and Automation,2008 16th Mediterranean Conference on,Ajaccio,2008.
    [6]DUAN R X,WAN G C,DONG D C.A New Assessment Method for System Reliability Based on Dynamic Fault Tree[C].Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation(ICICTA),2010 International Conference on,Changsha,2010.
    [7]KOLEK L,IBRAHIM M Y,GUNAWAN I,et al.Evaluation of Control System Reliability Using Combined Dynamic Faul t Trees and Markov Models[C].Industrial Informatics(INDIN),2015 IEEE 13th International Conference on,Cambridge,2015.
    [8]季会媛.动态故障树分析方法研究[D].哈尔滨:国防科学技术大学,2002.
    [9]朱正福,李长福,何恩山,等.基于马尔可夫链的动态故障树分析方法[J].兵工学报.2008,29(9):1104-1107.
    [10]李彦锋.复杂系统动态故障树分析的新方法及其应用研究[D].成都:电子科技大学,2013.
    [11]房丙午,黄志球,李勇,等.基于贝叶斯网络的复杂系统动态故障树定量分析方法[J].电子学报,2016,44(5):1234-1239.
    [12]孙利娜,黄宁,仵伟强,等.基于T-S模糊故障树的多态系统性能可靠性[J].机械工程学报,2016,52(10):191-198.
    [13]王雪飞,李青,冯力.基于模型和故障树的飞机故障诊断方法[J].科学技术与工程,2017,17(20):308-313.
    [14]张佳,贾向阳.基于故障树与Rete算法的电泵井工况诊断方法研究[J].现代电子技术,2017,40(2):34-38.
    [15]陈卫东,张昌卫,琚选择,等.水下生产系统管汇的故障树分析[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2016,37(8):1022-1026.
    [16]王炜俊.基于故障树法的城市轨道交通受电弓可靠性分析[J].科技创新导报,2016,13(1):59-61.
    [17]张国喜,李晓钟.基于灰色关联故障树的运营期隧道病害风险研究[J].工程管理学报,2016,30(1):77-81.
    [18]寇海霞,安宗文,刘波,等.基于贝叶斯网络的风电齿轮箱可靠性分析[J].兰州理工大学学报,2016,42(1):40-45.
    [19]张军.故障树最小割集法在S76直升机故障诊断中的应用[J].航空维修与工程,2015(12):79-80.
    [20]陈德道,安虎平,胡宗政.基于模糊理论的数控刀架故障诊断方法研究[J].组合机床与自动化加工技术,2015(10):84-87,90.