摘要
设计教育的现代化发展道路中,一直存在着艺术与设计的释义盲区。通过艺术与设计的语源考证,从本质上界定设计师的思维立场。现代设计的"审美性和功能性"价值需求,与古典艺术中的"学问和技术"的融合是共通的。设计教学培养方式应该围绕这一基准扩展细化,让现代设计师明确设计的审美性、功能性的内在结构关系,促使设计思维革新跟上人类可持续性的产业发展趋势。
There is always a blind spot of interpretation of art and design in the modern development path of design education. This study defines the designer's thinking position through the etymology of art and design. The integration of the "aesthetic and functional" value requirements of modern design is common with the "learning and technology" in classical art. Design teaching and training methods should be expanded and refined around this benchmark, so that modern designers can clearly understand the aesthetic and functional internal structural relationship of design, and promote the innovation of design thinking to keep up with the sustainable trend of industry.
引文
[1]杨端志.从清末民初科学小说新词语看“现代性”新词语的来源和发展:兼论“标志性子词语场”理论和“现代汉语词汇史”的起点[J].山东大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2007(1):147-153.
[2]贾玉平.汉字字形设计刍议:以早期的汉字字形设计现象为例[J].南京艺术学院学报:美术与设计版,2013(2):133-136.
[3]潘公凯.现代性与中国文化自主性[M].北京:人民出版社,2011:12.
[4]????????.??????[M].???,???,?.??:???,2000:14.
[5]???.???????[M].??:?????,1994:4.
[6]???.?????150?[M].??:???,1991:135.
[7]何星池.创意时代的品牌设计:用设计思维浅析品牌化[J].大众文艺,2016(18):97.
(1)图1来源:作者自制.