用户名: 密码: 验证码:
国外机构科研数据知识库研究进展
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Research Progress on Institutional Research Data Repositories Abroad
  • 作者:司莉 ; 曾粤亮
  • 英文作者:Si Li;Zeng Yueliang;Research Center of Information Resource,Wuhan University;School of Information Management,Wuhan University;
  • 关键词:机构科研数据知识库 ; 科研数据 ; 机构知识库 ; 科研数据管理 ; 机构科研数据知识库联盟
  • 英文关键词:institutional research data repository;;research data;;institutional repository;;research data management;;federation of institutional research data repository
  • 中文刊名:QBXB
  • 英文刊名:Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information
  • 机构:武汉大学信息资源研究中心;武汉大学信息管理学院;
  • 出版日期:2017-08-24
  • 出版单位:情报学报
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.36
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目“大数据环境下科研数据机构知识库联盟形成机理及其服务研究:以‘985’高校为实证对象”(71573198)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:QBXB201708011
  • 页数:12
  • CN:08
  • ISSN:11-2257/G3
  • 分类号:103-114
摘要
在e-Science和e-Research环境下,通过建立科研数据知识库对高校及其他研究机构的科研数据进行有效管理以促进机构内与机构间数据共享与学术交流,已逐渐成为近年来国外科研数据管理领域关注的课题。本研究以Web of Science、SpringerLink、ScienceDirect、Emeraldinsight、EBSCOhost以及ProQuest Research Library等数据库收录的文献为基础,探讨国外机构科研数据知识库(Institutional Research Data Repository,IRDR)研究的最新进展。国外该领域的研究主要涉及:机构知识库在科研数据管理中的作用、IRDR建设的需求与实践、IRDR的管理、IRDR的数据存储、IRDR的数据组织与检索、IRDR的数据出版以及IRDR联盟。目前,国外IRDR研究呈现出以下特点:IRDR研究受到多个领域的关注、研究成果具有较强的实践指导性、注重IRDR的生命周期管理、IRDR联盟成为发展趋势。针对我国在该领域现有研究的一些问题,未来研究应重点关注IRDR理论研究的系统化、平台的建设与管理、面向科研人员服务的开展、知识产权研究及联盟机制的深入探索。
        In the era of e-Science and e-Research, it has been a growing concern in the field of research data management abroad to effectively manage research data by establishing research data repositories, both within and across universities and other research institutions, to promote data sharing and scholarly communication. This paper adopts Web of Science(Wo S), SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, Emeraldinsight, EBSCOhost, and ProQuest Research Library as the main data sources to conduct a systematic review on the latest progress of institutional research data repositories(IRDRs) overseas. It is shown that research on IRDR has mainly focused on the role of institutional repositories in the course of research data management, the needs and practice of IRDR development, the management of IRDRs, data storage in IRDRs, data organization and retrieval in IRDRs, data publishing of IRDRs, and the federation of IRDRs. Based on the literature analysis, it has become clear that research on IRDRs covers various research topics, presents strong practice guidance, and highlights the life-cycle management of IRDRs; besides, it is clear that the federation of IRDR has become a trend. On the basis of the findings, the future study of institutional research data repositories in China should focus on the systematization of theoretical study, the development and management of platforms, the conduction of related services for researchers, the further exploration of intellectual property, and research on the mechanism of IRDR federation.
引文
[1]EMC.The digital universe in 2020[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://www.emc.com/leadership/digital-universe/2012iview/index.html.
    [2]Carlson S.Lost in a sea of science data[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://sdl.syr.edu/course/week1/1_Introduction To The Course_Carl son_2006.pdf.
    [3]NSF.Data management plan[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://www.bu.edu/datamanagement/outline/funding-agencies/#nsf.
    [4]Nature.Data policies[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://www.nature.com/sdata/data-policies.
    [5]ASIS&T.RDAP summit 2011 program[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://www.asis.org/Conferences/RDAP11/program.html?_ga=1.10947380.1804790257.1468844132.
    [6]re3data.re3data.org search[EB/OL].[2017-4-2].http://www.re3data.org/search.
    [7]CODATA.Current best practice for research data management policies[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://znodo.org/record/27872/files/RDM_Policy_Briefing-CODATA-Executive_Summary-201405_Final.pdf.
    [8]ESRC.ESRC research data policy[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://www.esrc.ac.uk/files/about-us/policies-and-standards/esrc-researchdata-policy/.
    [9]EUDL.Edinburgh university data library research data management handbook[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://www.docs.is.ed.ac.uk/docs/data-library/EUDL_RDM_Handbook.pdf.
    [10]Cox A M,Pinfield S.Research data management and libraries:Current activities and future priorities[J].Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,2014,46(4):299-316.
    [11]National Science Foundation.Dissemination and sharing of research results[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsp.
    [12]Shreeves S L,Cragin M H.Introduction:Institutional repositories:Current state and future[J].Library Trends,2008,57(2):89-97.
    [13]Johnson R.Institutional repositories:partnering with faculty to improve scholarly communication[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://www.chinalibs.net/Upload/Pusfile/2012/12/17/2129147880.pdf.
    [14]Chapman J W,Reynolds D,Shreeves S A.Repository metadata:Approaches and challenges[J].Cataloging&Classification Quarterly,2009,47(3-4):309-325.
    [15]Shearer K.Institutional repositories:Towards the identification of critical success factors[J].Canadian Journal of Information and Library Sciences,2002,27(3):89-108.
    [16]Pampel H,Vierkant P,Scholze F,et al.Making research data repositories visible:The re3data.org registry[J].PLo S ONE,2013,8(11):e78080.
    [17]Rodrigues E.Open access to publications and research data in horizon 2020:What are the requirements and how can institutional repositories and Open AIREhelp to meet them?[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/30521/1/353-360-tr Di PP2014-45-E.Rodrigues-final.pdf.
    [18]Palmer L.Cultivating scholarship:The role of institutional repositories in health sciences libraries[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lib_articles/152.
    [19]Kim Y,Kim S.Institutional,motivational,and resource factors influencing health scientists’data-sharing behaviours[J].Journal of Scholarly Publishing,2015,46(4):366-389.
    [20]Kim Y,Adler M.Social scientists’data sharing behaviors:Investigating the roles of individual motivations,institutional pressures,and data repositories[J].International Journal of Information Management,2015,35(4):408-418.
    [21]Schwartz A,Pappas C,Sandlow L J.Data repositories for medical education research:issues and recommendations[J].Academic Medicine:Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges,2010,85(5):837-843.
    [22]Diekema A R,Wesolek A,Walters C D.The NSF/NIH effect:surveying the effect of data management requirements on faculty,sponsored programs,and institutional repositories[J].The Journal of Academic Librarianship,2014,40(3-4):322-331.
    [23]Vizcaíno J A,Foster J M,Martens L.Proteomics data repositories:Providing a safe haven for your data and acting as a springboard for further research[J].Journal of Proteomics,2010,73(11):2136-2146.
    [24]Walters T O.The new academic library—building institutional repositories to support changing scholarly and research rocesses[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/national/baltimore/papers/56.pdf.
    [25]Cragin M H,Palmer C L,Koganetc M.Data sharing,small science,and Institutional repositories[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://www.allhands.org.uk/2009/09/Cragin_UK_All-Hands_2009_fina l2.pdf.
    [26]Normore L F,Tebo M E.Assessing user requirements for a small scientific data repository[J].Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science&Technology,2011,48(1):1-4.
    [27]Franke T,Gruetza R,Dickmanna F.Functional requirements for a central research imaging data repository[J].Studies in Health Technology&Informatics,2013,192(1):298-302.
    [28]Mc Kay D.Oranges are not the only fruit:an institutional case study demonstrating why data digital libraries are not the whole answer to e-research[C]//Proceedings of the Role of Digital Libraries in a Time of Global Change,and 12th International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries.Heidelberg:SpringerVerlag,2010:236-249.
    [29]Wilson J A J,Martinez-Uribe L,Fraser M A,et al.An institutional approach to developing research data management infrastructure[J].International Journal of Digital Curation,2011,6(2):274-287.
    [30]Angus W.Improving research visibility—getting data on the institutional repository RADAR[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/developing-rdm-services/repository-radar.
    [31]Lee D J,Stvilia B.Data curation practices in institutional repositories:an exploratory study[J].Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science&Technology,2014,51(1):1-4.
    [32]Owonibi M,Koenig-Ries B.A quality management workflow proposal for a biodiversity data repository[C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Conceptual Modeling.Cham:Springer International Publishing,2014:157-167.
    [33]Buchmann T,Jablonski S,Volz B,et al.Towards a generic infrastructure for sustainable management of quality controlled primary data[C]//Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems.Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag Berlin,2010:130-138.
    [34]DCC.Curation lifecycle model[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/curation-lifecycle-model.
    [35]Burton A,Treloar A.Designing for discovery and re-use:the‘ANDS Data Sharing Verbs’approach to service decomposition[J].International Journal of Digital curation,2009,4(3):44-56.
    [36]Witt M.Institutional repositories and research data curation in a distributed environment[J].Library Trends,2008,57(2):191-201.
    [37]Johnston L.Curating research data in DRUM:A workflow and distributed staffing model for institutional data repositories[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/escience_symposium/2016/posters/17/.
    [38]曹锦丹,徐坤.e-science环境下科研数据研究现状与发展趋势[J].情报科学,2014,32(2):58-62.
    [39]Perry C M.Archiving of publicly funded research data:A survey of Canadian researchers[J].Government Information Quarterly,2008,25(1):133-148.
    [40]Downing J,Murray-Rust P,Tonge A P,et al.SPECTRa:the deposition and validation of primary chemistry research data in digital repositories[J].Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling,2008,48(8):1571-1581.
    [41]Shin D D,Ozyurt I B,Brown G G,et al.The Cerebral Blood Flow Biomedical Informatics Research Network(CBFBIRN)data repository[J].Neuro Image,2016,124(Pt B):1202-1207.
    [42]Dima E,Henrich V,Hinrichs E,et al.A repository for the sustainable management of research data[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2012/pdf/470_Paper.pdf.
    [43]Andrew T,David G,Cathrine H.The data curation continuum:managing data objects in institutional repositories[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://www.chinalibs.net/Upload/Pusfile/2010/7/12/401631663.pdf.
    [44]Choudhury G.Case study in data curation at Johns Hopkins University[J].Library Trends,2008,57(2):211-220.
    [45]Gutteridge C.Using the institutional repository to publish research data[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/270885/.
    [46]Drury C,Sefton P,Watson K.Ready or not here it comes:Australian institutional research repository data readiness surveys2010[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=5098&la=en.
    [47]Bradbury S,Broadley P,Edussuriya G.Research Data Finder:An institutional metadata repository[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://eprints.qut.edu.au/57538.
    [48]Wilson A,Cox M,Elsborg D,et al.A semantically enabled metadata repository for scientific data[J].Earth Science Informatics,2015,8(3):649-661.
    [49]Rousidis D,Garoufallou E,Balatsoukas P,et al.Evaluation of metadata in research data repositories:the case of the dc.subject element[C]//Proceedings of Research Conference on Metadata and Semantics Research.Cham:Springer International Publishing,2015:203-213.
    [50]Lowe B.Data Sta R:Bridging XML and OWL in science metadata management[C]//Proceedings of Research Conference on Metadata and Semantics Research.Heidelberg:Springer International Publishing,2009:141-150.
    [51]Wang Y,Pakhomov S,Dale J,et al.Application of HL7/LOINC document ontology to a university-affiliated integrated health system research clinical data repository[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC4419769&blobtype=pdf.
    [52]Payne P R,Borlawsky T,Kwok A,et al.Ontology-anchored approaches to conceptual knowledge discovery in a multi-dimensional research data repository[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC3041525/pdf/amia-s2008-85.pdf.
    [53]Tonon L,Fusco E.Data mining as a tool for information retrieval in digital institutional repositories[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://www.atlantis-press.com/php/download_paper.php?id=12679.
    [54]Ribeiro C,da Silva J R,Castro J A,et al.Motivators and deterrents for data description and publication:preliminary results[C]//Proceedings of OTM Confederated International Conferences“On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems”.Cham:Springer-Verlag,2015:512-516.
    [55]Ulbricht D,Elger K,Bertelmann R,et al.pan Meta Docs,e Sci Doc,and DOIDB—an infrastructure for the curation and publication of file-based datasets for GFZ Data Services[J].ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information,2016,5(3):25.
    [56]Doorn P,Tjalsma H.Introduction:archiving research data[J].Archival Science,2007,7(1):1-20.
    [57]Patel M,Coles S.A study of curation and preservation issues in the e Crystals Data Repository and proposed federation[R/OL].[2016-10-15].http://opus.bath.ac.uk/21556/.
    [58]Plale B,Mcdonald R H,Chandrasekar K,et al.SEAD virtual archive:Building a federation of institutional repositories for long-term data preservation in sustainability science[J].International Journal of Digital Curation,2013,8(2):172-180.
    [59]Manion F J,Robbins R J,Weems W A,et al.Security and privacy requirements for a multi-institutional cancer research data grid:an interview-based study[J].BMC Medical Informatics&Decision Making,2009,9:31.
    [60]Adeleke O,Otoo E J.An integrated metadata access infrastructure for a network of federated curated data repositories[J].OCLC Systems&Services:International Digital Library Perspectives,2014,30(2):91-107.
    [61]肖希明,唐义.国外多领域数字资源整合研究进展[J].中国图书馆学报,2013,39(4):26-35.
    [62]中国科学院.2015中国机构知识库学术研讨会综述[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].http://www.gucas.cn/site/182?u=82293.
    [63]中国科学院.2016中国机构知识库学术研讨会会议综述[EB/OL].[2016-09-30].http://2016chinair.csp.escience.cn/dct/page/70011.
    [64]陈秀娟,吴鸣.学科领域科研数据知识库调研与分析——以化学领域为例[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(9):111-118,147.
    [65]朱玲,聂华,崔海媛,等.北京大学开放研究数据平台建设:探索与实践[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(4):44-51.
    [66]罗鹏程,朱玲,崔海媛,等.基于Dataverse的北京大学开放研究数据平台建设[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(3):52-58.
    [67]张琴,付开远.基于开放获取的IR联盟研究[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(2):131-135.
    [68]介凤,仁树怀.科研数据联盟及其对我国科研数据管理的启示[J].图书馆杂志,2014(10):49-53.
    (1)微阵列是人类基因组计划的逐步实施和分子生物学的迅猛发展及运用的产物,融微电子学、生命科学、计算机科学和光电化学为一体,是第三次革命(基因组革命)的主要技术之一;微阵列实验能同时大量地、全面性地侦测上万个基因的表达量,通过基因芯片在短时间内找出可能受疾病影响的基因,可作为早期诊断的生物标记(biomarker)。
    (1)为保护隐私,德国颁布的相关数据保护法规要求机构知识库在存储数据时,需要移除病人的受保护的健康医疗信息(Protected Health Information,PHI)。

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700