用户名: 密码: 验证码:
房价、房价收入比与流动人口长期居留意愿——来自流动人口的微观证据
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Housing Price,Price-Income Ratio and Long-Term Residence Intention of the Floating Population:Evidence from the Floating Population in China
  • 作者:李辉 ; 王良健
  • 英文作者:LI Hui;WANG Liangjian;College of Economics,Central South University of Forestry and Technology;College of Economics and Trade,Hunan University;
  • 关键词:房价 ; 房价收入比 ; 流动人口 ; 长期居留意愿 ; 农民工市民化 ; 新型城镇化 ; 户籍制度改革
  • 英文关键词:housing price;;housing price-income ratio;;floating population;;long-term residence intention;;citizenization of migrant workers;;new urbanization;;reform of household registration system
  • 中文刊名:JJDL
  • 英文刊名:Economic Geography
  • 机构:中南林业科技大学经济学院;湖南大学经济与贸易学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-26
  • 出版单位:经济地理
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39;No.256
  • 基金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(18CJY033);; 湖南省社会科学基金青年项目(18YBQ132);; 湖南省国土资源厅软科学研究计划项目(2017-11)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:JJDL201906010
  • 页数:11
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:43-1126/K
  • 分类号:88-98
摘要
近年来房价迅速上涨,对加快农业转移人口市民化提出新挑战。文章从理论上探讨房价对流动人口长期居留意愿的影响机理,然后将2015、2016年31 403个流动人员样本与177个地级以上城市房价数据进行匹配,采用含内生变量的Probit两步估计模型检验房价和房价收入比对流动人口长期居留意愿的影响,并加入相关变量的交叉项进一步检验影响效应的个体差异和城市差异。结果表明:①房价对流动人口长期居留意愿影响不显著,房价收入比对流动人口长期居留意愿存在显著负影响。②附着在房价之上的城市公共服务有助于减弱房价收入比上涨对流动人口长期居留意愿的负效应。③房价收入比上涨对未打算在城市购房的流动人口的长期居留意愿的消极效应大于打算在城市购房的流动人口。此外,房价收入比上涨对流动人口长期居留的影响效应还存在显著的代际差异、流动距离差异。
        The real estate price in China has been rising rapidly during the past ten years, posing a new challenge to agricultural population citizenization. This paper theoretically discusses the impact of housing price and housing priceincome ratio on long-term residence intention of floating population. Using the data of 31403 floating people matched with 203 cities' housing prices in 2015 and 2016, this article empirically tests the impact and the individual and urban differences by a probit model with cross variables introduced. Results show that: Firstly, the impact of housing price on floating population's long-term residence intention is uncertain, housing price-income ratio has a negative effect on the floating population's long-term residence intention. Secondly, urban public services help to reduce the negative effect of rising housing price-income ratio on floating population's long-term residence intention. Thirdly, the increasing price-income ratio has greater negative effect on the long-term residence intention of the intended renter than the intended purchaser. Fourthly, there are significant intergenerational differences and flow distance differences in the negative effects on floating population's long-term residence intention of the housing price-income ratio.
引文
[1]杨菊花.中国流动人口的社会融入研究[J].中国社会科学,2015(2):61-81.
    [2]张莉,何晶,马润泓.房价如何影响劳动力流动?[J].经济研究,2017(8):155-170.
    [3]颜咏华,郭志怡.中国人口流动迁移对城市化进程影响的实证分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(10):103-110.
    [4]李雪松,黄彦彦.房价上涨、多套房决策与中国城镇居民储蓄率[J].经济研究,2015(9):100-113.
    [5]高波,陈健,邹琳华.区域房价差异、劳动力流动与产业升级[J].经济研究,2012(1):66-79.
    [6]赵海益.“土地财政”会导致城镇“用工荒”吗[J].当代财经,2017(7):25-35.
    [7]Pablo A,Olympia B.Regional migration in Spain:the effect of personal characteristics and of unemployment,wage and house price differentials using pooled cross-sections[J].Oxford Bulletin of Economics&Statistics,1997,59(2):215-257.
    [8]Birgitta Rabe,Mark Taylor.Differences in opportunities?Wage,employment and house-price effects on migration[J].Oxford Bulletin of Economics&Statistics,2012,74(6):831-855.
    [9]高波,王文莉,李祥.预期、收入差距与中国城市房价租金“剪刀差”之谜[J].经济研究,2013(6):100-112.
    [10]董昕.房价压力、房租负担与人口长期居留意愿[J].财经问题研究,2016(3):3-10.
    [11]李拓,李斌.中国跨地区人口流动的影响因素:基于286个城市面板数据的空间计量检验[J].中国人口科学,2015(2):73-84.
    [12]韩名春,冯钟.房价上涨对人口城市化的影响:基于房价收入比门槛效应的分析[J].城市问题,2017(5):98-103.
    [13]Dohmen T J.Housing,mobility and unemployment[J].Regional Science&Urban Economics,2005,35(3):305-325.
    [14]Plantinga J A,Cécile D D,Hunt G L,et al.Housing prices and inter-urban migration[J].Regional Science and Urban Economics,2013,43(2):296-306.
    [15]夏怡然,陆铭.城市间的孟母三迁:公共服务影响劳动力流向的经验研究[J].管理世界,2015(10):78-90.
    [16]范剑勇,莫家伟,张吉鹏.居住模式与中国城镇化:基于土地供给视角的经验研究[J].中国社会科学,2015(4):44-64.
    [17]Blomquist G C,Berger M C.Mobility and destination in migration decisions:The roles of earnings,quality of life,and housing prices[J].Journal of Housing Economics,1992,2(1):37-59.
    [18]Angus D,Guy L.Housing,Land Prices,and Growth[J].Journal of Economic Growth,2001,6(2):87-105.
    [19]Drazen A,Eckstein Z.On the organization of rural markets and the process of economic development[J].The American Economic Review,1988,78(3):431-443.
    [20]盛亦男.流动人口居留意愿的梯度变动与影响机制[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(1):128-136.
    [21]董昕.住房支付能力与农业转移人口的持久性迁移意愿[J].中国人口科学,2015(6):91-100.
    [22]陶然,孔德华,曹广忠.流动还是留守:中国农村流动人口子女就学地选择与影响因素考察[J].中国农村经济,2011(6):37-44.
    [23]朱江丽,李子联.户籍改革、人口流动与地区差距:基于异质性人口跨期流动模型的分析[J].经济学(季刊),2016,15(2):797-816.
    [24]贺艳华,邓凯韶,唐承丽,等.长株潭城市群城乡人口流动特征及动力机制[J].经济地理,2017,37(1):74-81.
    [25]侯慧丽.城市公共服务的供给差异及其对人口流动的影响[J].中国人口科学,2016(1):118-126.
    [26]Rivers D,Vuong Q H.Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous Probit models[J].Journal of Econometrics,1988,39(3):347-366.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700