司法改革背景下的审判者权责一致问题研究

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：On the Consistency of the Rights and Liabilities of the Adjudicator under the Background of Judicial Reform 作者：武小琳 英文作者：Wu Xiao-lin;Sichuan Police College; 关键词：司法改革 ; 主审法官 ; 合议庭责任制 ; 审判权运行机制 英文关键词：judicial reform;;presiding judge;;liability system of collegiate bench;;the operational mechanism of jurisdiction 中文刊名：ZFXK 英文刊名：Journal of Political Science and Law 机构：四川警察学院; 出版日期：2015-08-15 出版单位：政法学刊 年：2015 期：v.32;No.155 基金：2015年度四川省教育厅科研项目(15SB0157) 语种：中文; 页：ZFXK201504003 页数：6 CN：04 ISSN：44-1007/D 分类号：16-21

摘要

新一轮司法改革背景下健全审判权运行机制,让审判者裁判,由裁判者负责要求对法院内部的权力结构进行重新划分,将完满状态的审判权归还法官,取消院、庭长对案件的审批和把关,重新定义审判委员会的功能和职责。构建权责明晰,权责一致的司法责任制度,需要明确司法责任的基本理论,重点在于确立主审法官、合议庭成员的免责情形,不以社会效果为案件质量判断标准,以遵守法律法规的规定、严守职业道德作为法官免责的最有力保障。司法改革并不全在司法,整体推进、多措并行是我国司法改革的必由之路。
        The new round of judicial reform requires the improvement of the operational mechanism of jurisdiction and the adjudicator's right as a judge and its liability as a responsible person demand reallocating the power structure of the law court by fully returning the adjudicative power to the judge,getting rid of the examining and approval procedure from the chief judge and presiding judge and redefining the function and liability of the judicial committee. Constructing judicial system with clearly- defined and consistent rights and liabilities requires a clear understanding of the basic theories of judicial liability. The main focuses shall surround the prescription of situations in which the responsible judges and members of the collegiate bench are free from undertaking liabilities. The social effect shall not be taken as a criterion to judge the quality of a case trial. On the contrary,strictly adhering to the prescriptions of laws and regulations and professional ethics shall be regarded as the major guarantee to prevent them from undertaking liabilities. Judicial reform is not limited within the field of justice. To conduct a holistic approach and take all the measures possible is the ultimate choice of China's judicial reform.

引文

[1]解读司法改革“上海方案”还需大量细致配套措施[N/OL].人民日报,http://news.china.com.cn/2014-07/15/content_32951209.htm.2014-07-15.
    [2]张柏峰.中国的司法制度[M].北京:法律出版社,2004.
    [3]陈瑞华.司法权的性质——以刑事司法为范例的分析[J].法学研究,2000,(5).
    [4]张永泉.司法审判民主化研究[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2007.
    [5]珠海市横琴新区法院司法改革探索:取消审判庭,设专职法官[EB/OL].http://www.bjnews.com.cn/news/2014/05/29/318683.html,2014-05-29.
    [6]张明楷.刑事司法改革的断片思考[J].现代法学,2014,(4).
    [7]当事人败诉自杀法官受审一审判决法官被判无罪[EB/OL].http://news.sohu.com/2003/12/05/94/news216519409.shtml,2003-12-05.
    [8]范明志.司法改革必须整体推进[A].李林,冀祥德.法治中国论坛·依法治国与深化司法体制改革[C].北京:方志出版社,2013.
    [9]李林,熊秋红.积极稳妥有序推进司法体制改革试点[N/OL].http://theory.people.com.cn/n/2014/0816/c40531-25477735.html.2015-08-16/
    [10]何帆.做好法官员额的“加减法”[N].人民法院报,2014-07-17(002).