用户名: 密码: 验证码:
差异性任务情境下用户移动诊疗信息搜索行为分析——一项实验研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Analysis of Users' Mobile Medical Information Search Behavior under Different Task Situations——An Experimental Study
  • 作者:张敏 ; 车雨霏 ; 张艳
  • 英文作者:Zhang Min;Che Yufei;Zhang Yan;School of Information Management,Wuhan University;School of Public Policy and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;
  • 关键词:差异性任务情境 ; 诊疗信息 ; 移动搜索行为
  • 英文关键词:different task situations;;medical information;;mobile search behavior
  • 中文刊名:XDQB
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Modern Information
  • 机构:武汉大学信息管理学院;中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院;
  • 出版日期:2018-12-27
  • 出版单位:现代情报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39;No.331
  • 基金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“在线健康社区用户知识共享行为的间歇性中辍现象研究:基于信息生态链的分析视角”(项目批准号:18YJA870016);教育部世界一流学科“图书情报与数据科学”项目以及武汉大学自主科研项目(人文社会科学)“70后”学者学术发展计划专题项目“数字人文和语义挖掘”
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XDQB201901008
  • 页数:9
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:22-1182/G3
  • 分类号:52-60
摘要
[目的/意义]探究差异性任务情境对用户移动诊疗信息搜索行为的影响,并基于对比分析为移动诊疗信息的产品和服务创新提供改进方法和策略。[方法/过程]选取事实型、解释型和探索型3种代表性任务情境,采用"情境实验+问卷访谈"的方法获取研究样本的行为特征数据并辅助以录屏软件全程记录实验过程,通过人工编码、数据清洗和数据预处理等步骤对收集到的问卷文本和视频数据进行处理,获得36个有效样本和108份有效数据并利用SPSS22. 0进行Mann-Whitney非参数检验。[结果 /结论]差异性任务情境对搜索过程变量均具有显著影响。相对于事实型任务,解释型任务和探索型任务不仅在查询串修改次数、访问网页数和点击链接数上显著更多,而且在搜索策略上也倾向于使用更多的搜索渠道。任务类型对用户在任务完成前后的感知任务难度、感知完成度和客观完成度等指标上有显著影响,其中事实型任务难度最低且客观完成度最高,任务类型对用户的任务认知和感知多渠道搜索有用性无显著影响。
        [Purpose/Significance] This study aimed to explore the impact of different task situations on users' mobile medical information search behavior,and provide improved methods and strategies for product and service innovation of mobile medical information based on comparative analysis. [Method/Process] Factual task,explanatory task and exploratory task were selected as three most representative task situations. "situation experiment+questionnaire interview" was adopted to obtain behavioral characteristics data of the research samples and the experimental process was recorded through the screen recording software. The collected questionnaire text and video data were processed through manual coding,data cleaning and data preprocessing,and 36 valid samples and 108 valid data were obtained and Mann-Whitney nonparametric test was performed using SPSS22. 0. [Result/Conclusion] Different task situations had a significant effect on search process variables. Compared with factual tasks,explanatory tasks and exploratory tasks not only significantly increased the number of query string modifications,the number of visited pages and the number of click links,but also tended to use more search channels in search strategies; Task type had significant influence on perceived task difficulty before and after experiment,perceived task completion degree and objective task completion degree. Among them the factual task was the least difficult and the objective completion degree was the highest. However,task type had no significant effect on task cognition and perceived usefulness of multichannel search.
引文
[1] Rooks R N,Wiltshire J C,Elder K,et al. Health Information Seeking and Use Outside of the Medical Encounter:Is it Associated with Race and Ethnicity?[J]. Social Science&Medicine,2012,74(2):176-84.
    [2]聂丽丽,王沅.基于移动互联网的健康信息搜索行为研究[J].现代医院管理,2017,15(1):64-67.
    [3]吴丹,李一喆.不同情境下老年人网络健康信息检索行为与认知研究[J].图书馆论坛,2015,35(2):38-43.
    [4] Xiao N,Sharman R,Rao H R,et al. Factors Influencing Online Health Information Search:An Empirical Analysis of a National Cancer-related Survey[J]. Decision Support Systems,2014,57(1):417-427.
    [5]辛光辉.基于“Y一代”的高校图书馆用户信息行为研究[J].河南图书馆学刊,2015,(1):60-61.
    [6]张悦,张云秋.基于认知风格的网络健康信息搜索行为研究[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(7):103-107.
    [7] Chisolm D J,Hardin D S,Mccoy K S,et al. Health Literacy and Willingness to Use Online Health Information By Teens with Asthma and Diabetes.[J]. Telemedicine Journal and E-health:The Official Journal of the American Telemedicine Association,2011,17(9):676-82.
    [8]张敏,聂瑞,罗梅芬.健康素养对用户健康信息在线搜索行为的影响分析[J].图书情报工作,2016,(7):103-109,138.
    [9] Benotsch E G,Kalichman S,Weinhardt L S. HIV-AIDS Patients’Evaluation of Health Information on the Internet:The Digital Divide and Vulnerability to Fraudulent Claims.[J]. Journal of Consulting&Clinical Psychology,2004,72(6):1004-1011.
    [10]孙丽,王宇婷,曹锦丹.任务类型对用户网络健康信息搜寻行为的影响研究[J].情报科学,2015,(9):131-135.
    [11] Jain A V,Bickham D. Adolescent Health Literacy and the Internet:Challenges and Opportunities[J]. Current Opinion in Pediatrics,2014,26(4):435-439.
    [12]张洪武,冯思佳,赵文龙,等.基于网络用户搜索行为的健康信息需求分析[J].医学信息学杂志,2011,(5):13-18.
    [13]曹亭,张恒娟.基于百度指数的用户健康信息搜寻行为分析[J].中国中医药图书情报杂志,2016,(4):16-18.
    [14]王若佳,李培.基于日志挖掘的用户健康信息检索行为研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,(11):111-118.
    [15]吴丹,李一喆.老年人网络健康信息检索行为实验研究[J].图书情报工作,2014,(12):102-108.
    [16]周晓英,蔡文娟.大学生网络健康信息搜寻行为模式及影响因素[J].情报资料工作,2014,(4):50-55.
    [17]刘小利.网络环境下患者健康信息查询行为研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2012.
    [18] Liu C,Gwizdka J,Liu J,et al. Analysis and Evaluation of Query Reformulations in Different Task Types[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science&Technology,2010,47(1):1-9.
    [19] Kim K S,Allen B. Cognitive and Task Influences on Web Searching Behavior[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2002,53(2):109-119.
    [20] Broder A. A Taxonomy of Web Search[C]. ACM SIGIR Forum,2002,36(2):2-10.
    [21]孙丽.任务类型对网络健康信息搜寻行为的影响及其预测模型研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2015.
    [22] Athukorala K,Gowacka D,Jacucci G,et al. Is Exploratory Search Different? A Comparison of Information Search Behavior for Exploratory and Lookup Tasks[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2016,67(11):2635-2651.
    [23] Bilal D. Children’s Use of the Yahooligans! Web Search Engine:Ⅱ. Cognitive and Physical Behaviors on Research Tasks[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science&Technology,2001,52(2):118-136.
    [24] AEndurur E,Yildirim Z. Students’Web Search Strategies With Different Task Types:An Eye-Tracking Study[J]. International Journal of Human’Computer Interaction,2015,31(2):101-111.
    [25]张敏,聂瑞,罗梅芬.基于需求类型与性别差异的网络健康信息检索行为特点分析[J].情报资料工作,2017,(2).
    [26]吴丹,毕仁敏.用户移动搜索与桌面搜索行为对比研究[J].现代图书情报技术,2016,(2):1-8.
    [27] Hernández Serrano M J,Serate González S,Campos Ortu1o R A.Influence of the Learning Styles and Task Type on Online Search Processes of Undergraduate Students[J]. Investigacioón Bibliotecoloógicandice Acumulativo, 2015, 29(65):115-136.
    [28]樊亚凤,韦斐琼,蒋晶,等.网络搜索任务类型对消费者信息搜索努力的影响:解释水平的调节作用[J].消费经济,2016,(2):64-69.
    [29]袁红,李秋.搜索任务和搜索能力对用户探索式搜索行为的影响研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,(15):94-105.
    [30]谭金波,王广新.学习情绪与查询任务类型的交互作用对网络信息搜索体验的影响[J].中国远程教育,2017,(9):19-25.
    [31]邱瑾,吴丹.用户协同信息检索行为与系统评价研究——以任务类型和协同能力为视角[J].现代图书情报技术,2012,(9):62-68.
    [32] Liu J,Liu C,Gwizdka J,et al. Can Search Systems Detect Users’Task Difficulty?:Some Behavioral Signals[J]. 2010:845-846.
    [33] Huang L,He Q,Song Y,et al. Task Trail:An Effective Segmentation of User Search Behavior[J]. Knowledge&Data Engineering IEEE Transactions on,2014,26(12):3090-3102.
    [34] Mehret S B,Valerie M M,Lonelyss C,et al. Internet Usage By Low-literacy Adults Seeking Health Information:An Observational Analysis[J]. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2004, 6(3):e25.
    [35]吴丹,梁少博,冉爱华.大学生用户移动搜索策略研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2016,(3):55-73.
    [36] Stoker D,Cooke A. Evaluation of Networked Information Sources[C]//Essen Symposium,1994:287-312.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700