经济学的度量空间与度量对象
|
摘要
经济学数量模型的应用效果普遍不是很好,一个重要原因是不能满足数学模型对完备度量空间的要求。而度量空间不完备的主要原因则是度量对象不够准确。经济学正确的度量对象是产权。相应地,经济学的研究对象应该是产权关系,也就是马克思主义经济学所称的所有制关系。产权在交换时表现出价值。由于产权的载体通常是产品,人们一直将产权的市场价值误称为产品的市场价值。这种误解应当纠正过来。以产权作为经济学的基本量纲,才能构建比较完备的度量空间。有了比较完备的度量空间,经济学模型才能实现"理论与事实之间的必要互动"。
The economic quantitative models are generally not very effective for practical application. One of essential explanations is that the models do not meet the requirement of mathematical models for complete metric space. The main cause of incomplete metric space is that the measurement object for economics is not well defined. The correct measurement object for economics is the property right. Therefore,the research object of economics should be the property right relation,that is the ownership relation called by Marxist economics. Property right show its value through exchange. People have always mistakenly referred to the market value of property rights as the market value of products because property rights are usually embodied in products. This error should be corrected. Only by taking property right as the basic dimension of economics can a relatively complete metric space be constructed. With a relatively complete metric space,the economic model can realize the necessary interaction between theory and matter-of-factness.
The economic quantitative models are generally not very effective for practical application. One of essential explanations is that the models do not meet the requirement of mathematical models for complete metric space. The main cause of incomplete metric space is that the measurement object for economics is not well defined. The correct measurement object for economics is the property right. Therefore,the research object of economics should be the property right relation,that is the ownership relation called by Marxist economics. Property right show its value through exchange. People have always mistakenly referred to the market value of property rights as the market value of products because property rights are usually embodied in products. This error should be corrected. Only by taking property right as the basic dimension of economics can a relatively complete metric space be constructed. With a relatively complete metric space,the economic model can realize the necessary interaction between theory and matter-of-factness.
引文
[1]Lucas,Robert,Studies in Business-Cycle Theory.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.1981:11.
[2]Romer Paul.Mathiness in the Theory of Economic Growth[J].American Economic Review:Papers&Proceedings,105(5),2015:89-93.
[3]艾克纳S.阿尔弗雷德.经济学为什么不是一门科学?[M].苏通等,译.北京:北京大学出版社,1990.
[4]Lars P lsson Syll.What is(wrong with)Economic Theory?[J].Real-world Economics Review,Issue no.54,2010.
[5]关红玉.数量经济学的尴尬[J].中国统计,2012(4):18-19.
[6]朱富强.现代数量经济学中的庸俗化倾向[J].江淮论坛,2008(5):17-25.
[7]李金华.数量经济学在中国的源起、发展及其面临的挑战[J].经济学动态,2016(3):146-158.
[8]艾伦G.D.R.数理经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005:200.
[9]魏权龄.数量经济学(第二版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014:80.
[10]谌贻庆,陶春峰.数理经济学理论与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2014:71.
[11]Sims A.2010.Christopher.But Economics Is Not an Experimental Science[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives-Volume 24,Number 2,Spring:59-68.
[12]王光健,胡友宇,石媚山.管理学原理(第2版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2018:3-4.
[13]斯大林.苏联社会主义经济问题[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,译.北京:人民出版社,1964:58.
[14]邵彦敏.经济制度动态发展的理论分析---马克思制度经济学与新制度经济学的比较[J].当代经济研究,2004(9):42-45.
[15]朱晓平.生产关系研究与制度研究---拓展社会主义政治经济学研究层面的思考[J].经济学动态,2003(2):15-21.
[16]黄少安.制度经济学实质上都是关于产权的经济学[J].经济纵横,2010(9):1-7.
[17]吴振球.马克思产权理论与西方产权理论:关于方法论的比较[J].兰州商学院学报,2007,23(4):8-14.
[18]Coase,R.H.1960.The Problem of Social Cost[J].Journal of Law and Economics,3(1):1-44.
(1)科普中国百科科学词条编写与应用工作项目:“完备度量空间”,https://baike. baidu. com/item. 2018。
(1)《马克思恩格斯选集》,人民出版社,1995年版,第100页,第354页。
(1)比如低收入公民享受救济的权利,公共管理和决策权利等,法律是禁止交换的。
(2)《马克思恩格斯选集》,人民出版社,1995年版,第8页。
(1)注意到每个人都是属于社会的,私有产权最终也可以认为是公有产权的一种特殊形式。这需要上升到哲学层面去探讨,本文不再赘述。
(1)当然,不关心度量空间的人并不认为自己是在做智力游戏。
[2]Romer Paul.Mathiness in the Theory of Economic Growth[J].American Economic Review:Papers&Proceedings,105(5),2015:89-93.
[3]艾克纳S.阿尔弗雷德.经济学为什么不是一门科学?[M].苏通等,译.北京:北京大学出版社,1990.
[4]Lars P lsson Syll.What is(wrong with)Economic Theory?[J].Real-world Economics Review,Issue no.54,2010.
[5]关红玉.数量经济学的尴尬[J].中国统计,2012(4):18-19.
[6]朱富强.现代数量经济学中的庸俗化倾向[J].江淮论坛,2008(5):17-25.
[7]李金华.数量经济学在中国的源起、发展及其面临的挑战[J].经济学动态,2016(3):146-158.
[8]艾伦G.D.R.数理经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005:200.
[9]魏权龄.数量经济学(第二版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014:80.
[10]谌贻庆,陶春峰.数理经济学理论与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2014:71.
[11]Sims A.2010.Christopher.But Economics Is Not an Experimental Science[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives-Volume 24,Number 2,Spring:59-68.
[12]王光健,胡友宇,石媚山.管理学原理(第2版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2018:3-4.
[13]斯大林.苏联社会主义经济问题[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,译.北京:人民出版社,1964:58.
[14]邵彦敏.经济制度动态发展的理论分析---马克思制度经济学与新制度经济学的比较[J].当代经济研究,2004(9):42-45.
[15]朱晓平.生产关系研究与制度研究---拓展社会主义政治经济学研究层面的思考[J].经济学动态,2003(2):15-21.
[16]黄少安.制度经济学实质上都是关于产权的经济学[J].经济纵横,2010(9):1-7.
[17]吴振球.马克思产权理论与西方产权理论:关于方法论的比较[J].兰州商学院学报,2007,23(4):8-14.
[18]Coase,R.H.1960.The Problem of Social Cost[J].Journal of Law and Economics,3(1):1-44.
(1)科普中国百科科学词条编写与应用工作项目:“完备度量空间”,https://baike. baidu. com/item. 2018。
(1)《马克思恩格斯选集》,人民出版社,1995年版,第100页,第354页。
(1)比如低收入公民享受救济的权利,公共管理和决策权利等,法律是禁止交换的。
(2)《马克思恩格斯选集》,人民出版社,1995年版,第8页。
(1)注意到每个人都是属于社会的,私有产权最终也可以认为是公有产权的一种特殊形式。这需要上升到哲学层面去探讨,本文不再赘述。
(1)当然,不关心度量空间的人并不认为自己是在做智力游戏。