权力、资本与日常生活建构下的古城空间生产——以云南巍山蒙阳公园为例
|
摘要
拥有丰富历史文化遗产与完整历史风貌的古城,已经成为了空间生产的重要实践舞台。基于空间生产理论,以云南巍山古城蒙阳公园为田野调查对象,探寻在古城保护与旅游开发背景下,权力、资本以及居民日常生活如何建构城市空间。权力与资本合力将历史空间与公共空间转化为旅游与消费空间,但同时受保护规划的约束,而由民众形成的趣缘群体通过日常生活重构空间,还原了公共性与地方性。通过揭示本案例的空间三重性及生产逻辑,对历史文化名城如何平衡保护与开发、全球与地方具有借鉴意义。
The ancient city with rich historical and cultural heritage and complete historical features has become an important practical stage for space production. Based on the theory of space production, this paper takes Mengyang Park, of the ancient city of Weishan, Yunnan as the field investigation object, and explores how power, capital and daily life of residents construct space in in the context of ancient city protection and tourism development. The combination of power and capital transforms historical space and public space into tourism and consumption space, but at the same time there is the constraint of protection planning. Theinterests groups reconstruct the space through daily life and restore publicity and locality. Revealing the triple space production logic of this casecan be used for reference on how to balance the protection and development of historical and cultural cities, and the world and the local.
The ancient city with rich historical and cultural heritage and complete historical features has become an important practical stage for space production. Based on the theory of space production, this paper takes Mengyang Park, of the ancient city of Weishan, Yunnan as the field investigation object, and explores how power, capital and daily life of residents construct space in in the context of ancient city protection and tourism development. The combination of power and capital transforms historical space and public space into tourism and consumption space, but at the same time there is the constraint of protection planning. Theinterests groups reconstruct the space through daily life and restore publicity and locality. Revealing the triple space production logic of this casecan be used for reference on how to balance the protection and development of historical and cultural cities, and the world and the local.
引文
[1]白幡洋三郎.近代都市公园史:欧化的源流[M].李伟,南诚,译.北京:新星出版社,2014.
[2]包亚明.现代性与空间的生产[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2003.
[3]陈蕴茜.日常生活中殖民主义与民族主义的冲突——以中国近代公园为中心的考察[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学),2005,42(5):82-95.
[4]廖卫华.消费主义视角下城市遗产旅游景观的空间生产[M].北京:科学出版社,2018.
[5]廖春花,杨坤武.全球化与地方认同:城市历史街区研究的新视角[J].云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,46(1):49-56.
[6]刘彬,陈忠暖.权力、资本与空间:历史街区改造背景下的城市消费空间生产——以成都远洋太古里为例[J].国际城市规划,2018,33(1):75-80,118.
[7]吕舟.论遗产的价值取向与遗产保护[J].城市与区域规划研究,2017,9(1):224-226.
[8]夏建中.新城市社会学的主要理论[J].社会学研究,1998(4):49-55.
[9]王笛.街头文化:成都公共空间,下层民众与地方政治,1870-1930[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.
[10]吴飞.“空间实践”与诗意的抵抗——解读米歇尔·德塞图的日常生活实践理论[J].社会学研究,2009(2):177-199.
[11]朱竑,钱俊希,陈晓亮.地方与认同:欧美人文地理学对地方的再认识[J].人文地理,2010(6):1-6.
[12] Harvey D. From space to place and back again:Reflections on the condition of postmodernity[M]. London:Routledge, 2012:17-44.
[13] LefebvreH. The production of space[M]. Hoboken:WileyBlackwel Publishers, 1991.
[14] Lefebvre H. The everyday and everydayness[M]. New Haven:Yale French Studies, 1987.
[2]包亚明.现代性与空间的生产[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2003.
[3]陈蕴茜.日常生活中殖民主义与民族主义的冲突——以中国近代公园为中心的考察[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学),2005,42(5):82-95.
[4]廖卫华.消费主义视角下城市遗产旅游景观的空间生产[M].北京:科学出版社,2018.
[5]廖春花,杨坤武.全球化与地方认同:城市历史街区研究的新视角[J].云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,46(1):49-56.
[6]刘彬,陈忠暖.权力、资本与空间:历史街区改造背景下的城市消费空间生产——以成都远洋太古里为例[J].国际城市规划,2018,33(1):75-80,118.
[7]吕舟.论遗产的价值取向与遗产保护[J].城市与区域规划研究,2017,9(1):224-226.
[8]夏建中.新城市社会学的主要理论[J].社会学研究,1998(4):49-55.
[9]王笛.街头文化:成都公共空间,下层民众与地方政治,1870-1930[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.
[10]吴飞.“空间实践”与诗意的抵抗——解读米歇尔·德塞图的日常生活实践理论[J].社会学研究,2009(2):177-199.
[11]朱竑,钱俊希,陈晓亮.地方与认同:欧美人文地理学对地方的再认识[J].人文地理,2010(6):1-6.
[12] Harvey D. From space to place and back again:Reflections on the condition of postmodernity[M]. London:Routledge, 2012:17-44.
[13] LefebvreH. The production of space[M]. Hoboken:WileyBlackwel Publishers, 1991.
[14] Lefebvre H. The everyday and everydayness[M]. New Haven:Yale French Studies, 1987.