摘要
张君劢提出中国的文化发展方向应是中间道路,同时强调文化创新和文化活力以及文化是对科学的救赎等思想。张君劢的文化思想高扬中国传统文化的同时,认为文化研究需要博学与严谨的结合,同时还需保持精神自由。但是,也应看到其文化思想核心中的局限性,张君劢极度关注精神而缺乏对物质世界和社会的关注,没有看到绝对精神的局限性和科学对哲学的贡献等,这为当前的文化建设和道路的选择提供了一个很好的前鉴。
Zhang Jun-mai proposes that the direction of China's cultural development should take the middle way and he emphasizes cultural innovation and cultural vitality and the idea that culture is salvation of science.While Zhang Jun-mai's cultural thoughts promote the development of Chinese traditional culture,he believes that cultural studies require a combination of erudition and rigor,and spiritual freedom. However,we should also see the limitations of the core of his cultural thoughts. For lack of attention to the material world and society,Zhang Jun-mai is extremely concerned with spirit. He does not see the limitations of pure spirit and the contribution of science to philosophy. This provides a good example for current cultural construction and road selection.
引文
[1]洪晓楠.当代中国文化哲学研究[M].大连:大连出版社,2001.
[2]张君劢.明日之中国文化[M].济南:山东人民出版社,1998.
[3]梁启超.梁启超全集[M].北京:北京出版社,1997.
[4]柴文华.论张君劢的科学观与人生观[J].贵州社会科学,2004,(3).
[5]郑大华.论张君劢对西学东传的贡献[J].中国文化研究,2009,(2).
[6]杨东.张君劢文化思想研究[D].无锡:江南大学,2008.
[7]李杨.据旧开新:张君劢对儒家传统伦理思想的掘发和贡献[J].道德与文明,2014,(3).
[8]王呈祥.论张君劢的中西哲学比较研究[J].湖北社会科学,2012,(8).
[9]韦林珍,钟海.张君劢的中西文化观[J].江南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,(6).