《安娜·卡列尼娜》中安娜与列文的爱情观比较
|
摘要
对经典名著《安娜·卡列尼娜》的研究中,以往论者大多只关注和探讨安娜的形象及意义,对列文却少有提及和分析,其实列文在作品中是与安娜同等重要的一个不可或缺的主要人物。对比安娜和列文的爱情观差异,及由此派生出的两人不同的爱情理解及角色定位,深入分析安娜和列文所隐喻的爱情哲理,解读《安娜·卡列尼娜》的社会意义。
In the study of the classic Anna Karenina, most of the previous scholars only pay attention to and discuss the image and significance of Anna. There was little mention and analysis of Levine. In fact, Levine was an indispensable main figure in the story that was as important as Anna. This paper compares the view of love between Anna and Levine and their different understanding of love and role orientation, analyzes the love philosophy metaphorically by Anna and Levine, and helps the readers interpret the universal and profound social significance of the book Anna Karenina today.
In the study of the classic Anna Karenina, most of the previous scholars only pay attention to and discuss the image and significance of Anna. There was little mention and analysis of Levine. In fact, Levine was an indispensable main figure in the story that was as important as Anna. This paper compares the view of love between Anna and Levine and their different understanding of love and role orientation, analyzes the love philosophy metaphorically by Anna and Levine, and helps the readers interpret the universal and profound social significance of the book Anna Karenina today.
引文
[1]刘涯.安娜·卡列尼娜的结构与描写艺术[J].外国文学研究,1998(03):87-90.
[2](俄)列夫·托尔斯泰著,草婴译.安娜·卡列尼娜[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2007.
[3]张晓菁,李纯.女性在黑格尔伦理学中不平等地位探析[J].中华女子学院山东分院学报,2007(04):06-08.
[4]赵萱.安娜卡列尼娜的形象及悲剧根源的现代解读[J].辽宁师范大学学报, 2006(01):104-106.
[5]冯沪祥.两性之哲学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002.
[6]张玉娟.女性意识的萌芽与失落[J].中华女子学院学报,2006(02):78-84.
[2](俄)列夫·托尔斯泰著,草婴译.安娜·卡列尼娜[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2007.
[3]张晓菁,李纯.女性在黑格尔伦理学中不平等地位探析[J].中华女子学院山东分院学报,2007(04):06-08.
[4]赵萱.安娜卡列尼娜的形象及悲剧根源的现代解读[J].辽宁师范大学学报, 2006(01):104-106.
[5]冯沪祥.两性之哲学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002.
[6]张玉娟.女性意识的萌芽与失落[J].中华女子学院学报,2006(02):78-84.