大数据背景下的文献计量学研究进展与学科融合
|
摘要
[目的/意义]考察大数据背景下的文献计量学研究最新进展与学科融合趋势,为文献计量学与科学计量学的功能拓展及应用性研究提供启示与新思路。[方法/过程]结合大数据与数据科学的研究背景,归纳2017年第十六届ISSI大会的讨论主题以及其他相关文献的研究热点,预测文献计量学研究体系在大数据驱动下的三大发展趋势。[结果 /结论]文献计量学研究体系的发展变革与学科融合将成为未来趋势,主要体现在三个方面:大数据背景下新的科学交流与文献生成模式催生出计量学体系的学科融合;文献计量与引文分析自身不断创新并焕发生机;科学文献计量学的应用性研究领域不断拓展。
[Purpose/significance] This paper investigates into the research progress and disciplinary fusion tendency of bibliometrics under the background of big data,in order to provide references and new ideas for the function expansion and application research of bibliometrics and scientometrics. [Method/process] Under the research background of big data and data science,the paper summarizes the topics of the 16~(th) ISSI conference in 2017 and research hotspots of other relevant literature,and predicts the three development directions of bibliometrics research system driven by big data. [Result/conclusion]In the future,the revolution of bibliometrics subject system and disciplinary fusion will be the development tendencies,which are embodied by the following three aspects. Firstly,the new scientific communication and literature generation modes urge the emergence of metrics system disciplinary fusion. Secondly,bibliometrics and citation analysis make continuously innovation and vibration. And the demand for application research on bibliometrics and scientometrics is increasing.
[Purpose/significance] This paper investigates into the research progress and disciplinary fusion tendency of bibliometrics under the background of big data,in order to provide references and new ideas for the function expansion and application research of bibliometrics and scientometrics. [Method/process] Under the research background of big data and data science,the paper summarizes the topics of the 16~(th) ISSI conference in 2017 and research hotspots of other relevant literature,and predicts the three development directions of bibliometrics research system driven by big data. [Result/conclusion]In the future,the revolution of bibliometrics subject system and disciplinary fusion will be the development tendencies,which are embodied by the following three aspects. Firstly,the new scientific communication and literature generation modes urge the emergence of metrics system disciplinary fusion. Secondly,bibliometrics and citation analysis make continuously innovation and vibration. And the demand for application research on bibliometrics and scientometrics is increasing.
引文
[1]朝乐门.数据科学理论与实践[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2017.
[2]任全娥,耿海英. 2017年国外文献计量学研究的学科动态与研究热点[J].国外社会科学,2018(4):147-152.
[3]刘则渊.知识基因论视野下的“新兴研究领域识别计量”著作——《新兴研究领域识别计量》序言[EB/OL].[2018-08-13]. https://www. sohu. com/a/207851482_466843.
[4] BOYACK K W. Reference behavior in the full text of scientific articles:a large-scale analysis[C]. 16th. International Conference on Scientometrics&Informetrics Conference,2017.
[5] LI X,et al. Differences in citation personal display:does it exist in three social science disciplines?[C]. 16th. International Conference on Scientometrics&Informetrics Conference,2017.
[6] PRIEM J,TARABORELLI D,GROTH P,NEYLON C. Altmetrics:a manifesto[EB/OL].[2018-06-01]. http://altmetrics. org/manifesto/.
[7] HOLMBERG K,VAINIO J. Why do some research articles receive more online attention? Reasons for online success as measured with altmetrics[C]. 16th. International Conference on Scientometrics&Informetrics Conference,2017.
[8] COSTAS R, HONK J, FRANSSEN T. Scholars on twitter:who and how many are they?[C]. 16th. International Conference on Scientometrics&Informetrics Conference,2017.
[9] LIU X,SONG W. The usability of altmetrics in academic evaluation[C]. 16th. International Conference on Scientometrics&Informetrics Conference,2017.
[10]王菲菲,等.政策文件替代计量视角下的学术成果利用效率分布态势剖析[J].北京工业大学学报:社会科学版,2018(4):55-66.
[11] SHEN Z, YANG L Y. How large is large enough?[C].16th. International Conference on Scientometrics&Informetrics Conference,2017.
[12] CHI P S,GLANZEL W. Impact and usage indicators for the assessment of research in scientific disciplines and journal[C].16th. International Conference on Scientometrics&Informetrics Conference,2017.
[13] DENG S,YANG X. A new approach to evaluate the impact of papers with combining social and academic influence[C].16th. International Conference on Scientometrics&Informetrics Conference,2017.
[14]刘彩娥.把论文写在祖国大地上——国内科研论文外流现象分析[J].北京工业大学学报:社会科学版,2018(2):64-72.
[15]赵丹群.试论引文分析方法的网络化发展与应用[J].图书情报工作,2009(8):39-42.
[16]刘则渊.大数据时代的科学计量学新方向[M]//王贤文.科学计量学大数据及其应用.北京:科学出版社,2016.
[2]任全娥,耿海英. 2017年国外文献计量学研究的学科动态与研究热点[J].国外社会科学,2018(4):147-152.
[3]刘则渊.知识基因论视野下的“新兴研究领域识别计量”著作——《新兴研究领域识别计量》序言[EB/OL].[2018-08-13]. https://www. sohu. com/a/207851482_466843.
[4] BOYACK K W. Reference behavior in the full text of scientific articles:a large-scale analysis[C]. 16th. International Conference on Scientometrics&Informetrics Conference,2017.
[5] LI X,et al. Differences in citation personal display:does it exist in three social science disciplines?[C]. 16th. International Conference on Scientometrics&Informetrics Conference,2017.
[6] PRIEM J,TARABORELLI D,GROTH P,NEYLON C. Altmetrics:a manifesto[EB/OL].[2018-06-01]. http://altmetrics. org/manifesto/.
[7] HOLMBERG K,VAINIO J. Why do some research articles receive more online attention? Reasons for online success as measured with altmetrics[C]. 16th. International Conference on Scientometrics&Informetrics Conference,2017.
[8] COSTAS R, HONK J, FRANSSEN T. Scholars on twitter:who and how many are they?[C]. 16th. International Conference on Scientometrics&Informetrics Conference,2017.
[9] LIU X,SONG W. The usability of altmetrics in academic evaluation[C]. 16th. International Conference on Scientometrics&Informetrics Conference,2017.
[10]王菲菲,等.政策文件替代计量视角下的学术成果利用效率分布态势剖析[J].北京工业大学学报:社会科学版,2018(4):55-66.
[11] SHEN Z, YANG L Y. How large is large enough?[C].16th. International Conference on Scientometrics&Informetrics Conference,2017.
[12] CHI P S,GLANZEL W. Impact and usage indicators for the assessment of research in scientific disciplines and journal[C].16th. International Conference on Scientometrics&Informetrics Conference,2017.
[13] DENG S,YANG X. A new approach to evaluate the impact of papers with combining social and academic influence[C].16th. International Conference on Scientometrics&Informetrics Conference,2017.
[14]刘彩娥.把论文写在祖国大地上——国内科研论文外流现象分析[J].北京工业大学学报:社会科学版,2018(2):64-72.
[15]赵丹群.试论引文分析方法的网络化发展与应用[J].图书情报工作,2009(8):39-42.
[16]刘则渊.大数据时代的科学计量学新方向[M]//王贤文.科学计量学大数据及其应用.北京:科学出版社,2016.