农转居居民社区感问卷的编制
|
摘要
目的:编制农转居居民社区感问卷,并检验其信效度。方法:通过文献检索、小组访谈与问卷调查形成问卷的初始项目。选取627名农转居居民进行初测并根据结果对问卷进行修订。另外选取574名农转居居民进行正式施测,随机分为两等份,分别用于探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析。结果:农转居居民社区感问卷包含十二个项目,由身份维系、需求满足、发展预期三个维度构成,共解释总变异的70.298%,验证性因素分析显示问卷具有良好的结构效度(χ~2/df=2.016, RFI=0.962, CFI=0.985, NFI=0.971, IFI=0.985, RMSEA=0.036, PNFI=0.750, PCFI=0.761)。效标关联效度分析显示,社区感总分与生活满意度(r=0.663)和幸福倾向量表的三个维度:投入幸福感(r=0.657)、意义幸福感(r=0.683)、享乐幸福感(r=0.630)相关显著。总问卷的Cronbachα系数为0.948,身份维系、需求满足和发展预期三个维度的Cronbachα系数为0.861、0.883、0.813。结论:本研究编制的农转居居民社区感问卷信度和效度良好,可用于相关的社区研究与实践。
Objective: To develop Sense of Community Questionnaire for Farmers-to-Citizens(CSQFC) and test its validity and reliability. Methods: Through literatures review, interviews and open questionnaires form initial project. 627 Farmers-to-Citizens were predicted and the questionnaire was revised according to the results of the prediction. 700 Farmers-to-Citizens were tested, and 574 valid questionnaires were obtained, and 287 of which were assessed for exploratory factor analyses and 287 of which were assessed for confirmatory factor analyses. The Satisfaction With Life Scale(SWLS)and the Orientations to Happiness Scale(OHS) were used to test its criterion validity. Results: The questionnaire consisted of 12 items, including 3 dimensions: Identity Maintenance, Demand Satisfaction, Development expectation, explaining the total variance 70.298%. The results of CFA showed that the questionnaire fitted the data with well construct validity(χ~2/df=2.016, RFI=0.962, CFI=0.985, NFI=0.971, IFI=0.985, RMSEA=0.036, PNFI=0.750, PCFI=0.761). The CSQFC and its dimensions scores had obviously positive correlation with the SWLS and 3 dimensions of the OHS: Pleasure, Engagement and Meaning(P<0.01). The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.948, and 0.813-0.883 for the 3 dimensions. Conclusion: The CSQFC has satisfactory validity and reliability, and meets the needs of psychometrics, which can be used in both community research and practice.
Objective: To develop Sense of Community Questionnaire for Farmers-to-Citizens(CSQFC) and test its validity and reliability. Methods: Through literatures review, interviews and open questionnaires form initial project. 627 Farmers-to-Citizens were predicted and the questionnaire was revised according to the results of the prediction. 700 Farmers-to-Citizens were tested, and 574 valid questionnaires were obtained, and 287 of which were assessed for exploratory factor analyses and 287 of which were assessed for confirmatory factor analyses. The Satisfaction With Life Scale(SWLS)and the Orientations to Happiness Scale(OHS) were used to test its criterion validity. Results: The questionnaire consisted of 12 items, including 3 dimensions: Identity Maintenance, Demand Satisfaction, Development expectation, explaining the total variance 70.298%. The results of CFA showed that the questionnaire fitted the data with well construct validity(χ~2/df=2.016, RFI=0.962, CFI=0.985, NFI=0.971, IFI=0.985, RMSEA=0.036, PNFI=0.750, PCFI=0.761). The CSQFC and its dimensions scores had obviously positive correlation with the SWLS and 3 dimensions of the OHS: Pleasure, Engagement and Meaning(P<0.01). The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.948, and 0.813-0.883 for the 3 dimensions. Conclusion: The CSQFC has satisfactory validity and reliability, and meets the needs of psychometrics, which can be used in both community research and practice.
引文
1李克强.2018年政府工作报告全文[EB/OL].http://www.mod.gov.cn/topnews/2018-03/05/content_4805962.htm/2018-03-05
2北京市住房城乡建设委.关于农转居人员购买安置住房有关问题的通知京国土房管方[2002]606号[EB/OL].http://www.bjjs.gov.cn/bjjs/fwgl/zfgg/zfgg/350108/index.shtml/2005-03-09
3张汝立.从农转工到农转居--征地安置方式的变化与成效.城市发展研究,2004,11(4):5-7
4郑风田,赵淑芳.“农转居”过程中农村集体资产处置:问题与对策.甘肃社会科学,2005,6:214-218
5刘伟红.边界模糊的治理:集中农转居社区的类单位化自治之路--基于对山东省M社区的调查研究.湖北社会科学,2017,1:55-60
6吴群刚,孙志祥.中国式社区治理:基层社会服务管理创新的探索与实践.北京:中国社会出版社,2011
7 Townley G,Kloos B,Green EP,et al.Reconcilable differences?Human diversity,cultural relativity,and sense of community.American Journal of Community Psychology,2011,47(1-2):69-85
8 Sarason SB.The psychological sense of community:prospects for a community psychology.San Francisco,CA:Jossey Bass,1974.279-285
9李须,陈红,李冰冰,等.社区感:概念、意义、理论与新热点.心理科学进展,2015,23(7):1280-1288
10 Mcmillan DW,Chavis DM.Sense of community:A definition and theory.Journal of Community Psychology,1986,14(1):6-23
11 Mcmillan DW.Sense of community.Journal of Community Psychology,1996,24(4):315-325
12陈钒.城市居民的社区意识与社区参与的关系研究.四川师范大学,2009
13周佳娴.城市居民社区感研究--基于上海市的实证调查.甘肃行政学院学报,2011,4:56-71
14高鉴国.社区意识分析的理论建构.文史哲,2005,5:129-136
15陈永胜,牟丽霞.西方社区感研究的现状与趋势.心理科学进展,2007,15(1):169-173
16田毅鹏,齐苗苗.城乡结合部非定居性移民的“社区感”与“故乡情结”.天津社会科学,2013,2(2):53-58
17牟丽霞.城市居民的社区感:概念、结构与测量.浙江师范大学,2007
18武雪婷,陈传锋,沈斌表.城市外来务工人员社区感结构探索及其中介作用检验.心理研究,2009,2(5):44-48
19夏建中.社区概念与我国的城市社区建设.江南论坛,2011,8:7-8
20李文茂,雷刚.社区概念与社区中的认同建构.城市发展研究,2013,20(9):78-82
21 Chavis D,Lee K,Acosta J.The Sense of Community(SCI)revised:The reliability and validity of the SCI-2.the 2nd Interna-tional Community Psychology Conference.Lisbon,2008
22熊承清,许远理.生活满意度量表中文版在民众中使用的信度和效度.中国健康心理学杂志,2009,17(8):948-949
23 Peterson C,Park N,Seligman MEP.Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction:The full life versus the empty life.Journal of Happiness Studies,2005,6(1):25-41
24 Chen GH.Validating the orientations to happiness scale ina Chinese sample of university students.Social Indicators Research,2010,99(3):431-442
25刘视湘,郑日昌.职业评定量表(VIESA)的信度和效度研究.心理发展与教育,2001,17(1):47-51
26吴明隆.结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009.42-43
27吴晓燕,赵普兵.“过渡型社区”治理:困境与转型.理论探讨,2014,2:152-156
28徐永祥.政社分工与合作:社区建设体制改革与创新研究.东南学术,2006,6:51-57
2北京市住房城乡建设委.关于农转居人员购买安置住房有关问题的通知京国土房管方[2002]606号[EB/OL].http://www.bjjs.gov.cn/bjjs/fwgl/zfgg/zfgg/350108/index.shtml/2005-03-09
3张汝立.从农转工到农转居--征地安置方式的变化与成效.城市发展研究,2004,11(4):5-7
4郑风田,赵淑芳.“农转居”过程中农村集体资产处置:问题与对策.甘肃社会科学,2005,6:214-218
5刘伟红.边界模糊的治理:集中农转居社区的类单位化自治之路--基于对山东省M社区的调查研究.湖北社会科学,2017,1:55-60
6吴群刚,孙志祥.中国式社区治理:基层社会服务管理创新的探索与实践.北京:中国社会出版社,2011
7 Townley G,Kloos B,Green EP,et al.Reconcilable differences?Human diversity,cultural relativity,and sense of community.American Journal of Community Psychology,2011,47(1-2):69-85
8 Sarason SB.The psychological sense of community:prospects for a community psychology.San Francisco,CA:Jossey Bass,1974.279-285
9李须,陈红,李冰冰,等.社区感:概念、意义、理论与新热点.心理科学进展,2015,23(7):1280-1288
10 Mcmillan DW,Chavis DM.Sense of community:A definition and theory.Journal of Community Psychology,1986,14(1):6-23
11 Mcmillan DW.Sense of community.Journal of Community Psychology,1996,24(4):315-325
12陈钒.城市居民的社区意识与社区参与的关系研究.四川师范大学,2009
13周佳娴.城市居民社区感研究--基于上海市的实证调查.甘肃行政学院学报,2011,4:56-71
14高鉴国.社区意识分析的理论建构.文史哲,2005,5:129-136
15陈永胜,牟丽霞.西方社区感研究的现状与趋势.心理科学进展,2007,15(1):169-173
16田毅鹏,齐苗苗.城乡结合部非定居性移民的“社区感”与“故乡情结”.天津社会科学,2013,2(2):53-58
17牟丽霞.城市居民的社区感:概念、结构与测量.浙江师范大学,2007
18武雪婷,陈传锋,沈斌表.城市外来务工人员社区感结构探索及其中介作用检验.心理研究,2009,2(5):44-48
19夏建中.社区概念与我国的城市社区建设.江南论坛,2011,8:7-8
20李文茂,雷刚.社区概念与社区中的认同建构.城市发展研究,2013,20(9):78-82
21 Chavis D,Lee K,Acosta J.The Sense of Community(SCI)revised:The reliability and validity of the SCI-2.the 2nd Interna-tional Community Psychology Conference.Lisbon,2008
22熊承清,许远理.生活满意度量表中文版在民众中使用的信度和效度.中国健康心理学杂志,2009,17(8):948-949
23 Peterson C,Park N,Seligman MEP.Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction:The full life versus the empty life.Journal of Happiness Studies,2005,6(1):25-41
24 Chen GH.Validating the orientations to happiness scale ina Chinese sample of university students.Social Indicators Research,2010,99(3):431-442
25刘视湘,郑日昌.职业评定量表(VIESA)的信度和效度研究.心理发展与教育,2001,17(1):47-51
26吴明隆.结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009.42-43
27吴晓燕,赵普兵.“过渡型社区”治理:困境与转型.理论探讨,2014,2:152-156
28徐永祥.政社分工与合作:社区建设体制改革与创新研究.东南学术,2006,6:51-57