用户名: 密码: 验证码:
马铃薯栽培品种和地方品种矿质元素含量差异分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Mineral Contents Variation Among Cultivated and Local Potatoes
  • 作者:程林润 ; 许砚杰 ; 周鑫 ; 卞晓波 ; 张良 ; 蒋梅巧 ; 包劲松
  • 英文作者:CHENG Linrun;XU Yanjie;ZHOU Xin;BIAN Xiaobo;ZHANG Liang;JIANG Meiqiao;BAO Jinsong;Jinhua Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Key Laboratory of Zhejiang Province and Chinese Ministry of Agriculture for Nuclear-Agricultural Sciences/Institute of Nuclear Agricultural Science,Zhejiang University;Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Tuber and Root Crops,Ministry of Agriculture,the Institute of Vegetables and Flowers Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences;
  • 关键词:马铃薯 ; 矿质元素 ; 栽培品种 ; 地方品种
  • 英文关键词:potato;;mineral element;;cultivated potatoes;;local potatoes
  • 中文刊名:HNXB
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences
  • 机构:金华市农业科学研究院;浙江大学原子核农业科学研究所/农业部及浙江省核农学重点实验室;中国农业科学院蔬菜花卉研究所/农业部薯类作物生物学与遗传育种重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2018-09-19 11:40
  • 出版单位:核农学报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.32
  • 基金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(2016XZZX001-09);; 农业部薯类作物生物学与遗传育种重点实验室开放课题
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HNXB201811011
  • 页数:8
  • CN:11
  • ISSN:11-2265/S
  • 分类号:96-103
摘要
为明确地方品种在马铃薯微营养育种中的利用价值,本研究以46份马铃薯为试验材料,对比分析栽培品种和地方品种之间9种矿质元素(K、P、Na、Mg、Ca、Fe、Mn、Zn、Cu)含量的差异。结果表明,马铃薯各矿质元素的平均含量由高到低依次为K>P>Mg>Ca>Fe>Na>Zn>Mn>Cu,且各元素在栽培品种和地方品种内均存在较广的遗传多样性。栽培品种的K、P、Zn平均含量显著高于地方品种,而Na含量显著低于地方品种。相关性分析结果表明,栽培品种和地方品种马铃薯中K含量与P含量均呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),Zn含量、Mg含量与Mn含量呈显著正相关(P<0.05)。聚类分析结果显示,试验用马铃薯可分为3类,每一类中既有栽培品种,又有地方品种,说明地方品种在马铃薯矿质元素微营养育种改良中的利用价值不大。本研究结果为地方品种在矿质元素微营养育种中的利用价值方面提供了一定的参考。
        To explore the usefulness of the local potatoes in the micronutrients improvement for cultivated potatoes,46 potato accessions potato accessions including cultivated and local potatoes were used to study the differences in nine mineral elements( K,P,Na,Mg,Ca,Fe,Mn,Zn and Cu). The results showed that the average content of each mineral element in potato from high to low was in the order of K > P > Mg > Ca > Fe > Na > Zn > Mn > Cu,and the mineral element content exhibited wide genetic diversity in both cultivated and local potatoes. Although large variation in each element was found in both cultivars and local potatoes,the K,P and Zn contents of cultivated were higher than those in potatoes,while Na content was lower in the potato cultivars. The results of correlation analysis indicated that there were consistent extremely positive relationships between K and P( P < 0. 01),Zn and Mn,Mg and Mn( P < 0. 05)among cultivated and local potatoes. Cluster analysis based on the mineral element contents revealed three clusters among all potato accessions,and each cluster included both cultivated and local potatoes,which suggested that local potatoes had minor role in the breeding for improvement of mineral content. This study provided reference for the breeding of mineral elements.
引文
[1]麻汉林,郭志平.马铃薯高产施肥措施研究[J].中国马铃薯,2007,21(1):26-28
    [2]吕巨智,染和,姜建初.马铃薯的营养成分及保健价值[J].中国食物与营养,2009(3):51-52
    [3]郑建仙.功能性食品[M].第二卷.中国轻工业出版社,1999
    [4]Subramanian N K,White P J,Broadley M R,Ramsay G.Variation in tuber mineral concentrations among accessions of Solanum,species held in the Commonwealth Potato Collection[J].Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution,2017,64(8):1927-1935
    [5]White P J,Broadley M R.Biofortification of crops with seven mineral elements often lacking in human diets-iron,zinc,copper,calcium,magnesium,selenium and iodine[J].New Phytologist,2009,182(1):49-84
    [6]白磊,肖继坪,郭华春.130个马铃薯品种(系)的块茎营养品质评价[J].中国食物与营养,2017,23(2):70-74
    [7]廖虹,郭华春,刘艳.云南省马铃薯品种(系)块茎营养品质评价[J].西南农业学报,2013,26(4):1410-1415
    [8]黄越,李帅兵,石瑛.马铃薯不同品种块茎矿质营养品质的差异[J].作物杂志,2017(4):33-37
    [9]韩鸿萍,胡凤祖.FAAS测定黑马铃薯中的8种微量元素[J].光谱实验室,2011,28(3):1385-1387
    [10]阳淑,郝艳玲,牟婷婷.紫色马铃薯营养成分分析与质量评价[J].河南农业大学学报,2015,49(3):311-315
    [11]杨丽辉,蒙美莲,陈有君,肖强,宋树慧,陈峰.肥料配施对马铃薯产量和品质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2013(12):136-140
    [12]段玉,张君,李焕春,赵沛义,妥德宝,姚俊卿,安昊,贾有余.马铃薯氮磷钾养分吸收规律及施肥肥效的研究[J].土壤,2014,46(2):212-217
    [13]张西露,刘明月,伍壮生,黄科.马铃薯对氮、磷、钾的吸收及分配规律研究进展[J].中国马铃薯,2010,24(4):237-241
    [14]张晓艳,蒙美莲,门福义.马铃薯块茎还原糖含量与各器官含磷量的关系[J].中国马铃薯,2003,17(5):273-276
    [15]孙黛珍,杨海峰,王曙光,曹亚萍,杨武德.山西小麦品种资源醇溶蛋白组成的遗传变异[J].核农学报,2009,23(6):939-946
    [16]张锡洲,阳显斌,李廷轩,余海英,马程,张世元,罗关友.野生大麦氮素吸收利用的基因型差异[J].核农学报,2011,25(6):1261-1267
    [17]张亮行,张帆涛,温秀芳,周毅,罗向东,谢建坤.利用c DNAAFLP技术分析东乡野生稻干旱胁迫的差异表达基因[J].核农学报,2016,30(8):1498-1505
    [18]戴智慧,龙骏,俞雷民,倪穗.宁波地区野生换锦花遗传多样性的ISSR分析[J].核农学报,2016,30(10):1898-1905
    [19]蔡一林,何晓阳.玉米单交种和地方品种的辐射效应及亲子相关性研究[J].核农学报,1995(2):81-85
    [20]杨继,陆智明,陆国权,谢德平.几种特色根茎植物的矿物质成分分析[J].食品工业科技,2009(5):312-314
    [21]赵雪君,石瑛.施钾量对马铃薯块茎钾素吸收积累的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2015,43(10):50-54
    [22]伍壮生.氮磷钾施肥水平对马铃薯产量及品质的影响[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2008:3-4
    [23]刘文璐.施钾与覆膜对滴灌马铃薯钾素吸收积累及利用效率的影响[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2012:1-2
    [24]徐海泉,王秀丽,马冠生.马铃薯及其主食产品开发的营养可行性分析[J].中国食物与营养,2015,21(7):10-13
    [25]马振勇,杜虎林,刘荣国,牛金帅,刘超.施锌肥对旱作马铃薯植株锌含量及块茎品质的影响[J].华北农学报,2017,32(1):201-207
    [26]王延明.锌肥用量及施用方法对马铃薯产量形成及营养品质的影响[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2014:1-2
    [27]吕金荣.微量元素铁与人体健康[J].微量元素与健康研究,2006,23(3):63-64
    [28]Gussarsson M,Adalsteinsson S,Jensén P,Asp H.Cadmium and copper interactions on the accumulation and distribution of Cd and Cu in birch(Betula pendula,Roth)seedlings[J].Plant&Soil,1995,171(1):185-187
    [29]习敏,杜祥备,张胜,刘美英,蒙美莲.施肥对马铃薯锰素吸收及养分利用效率的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2011,39(6):159-162

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700