《更路簿》与潭门地方性的建构与再现
|
摘要
新文化地理学提倡关注文本中的地理。运用内容分析与文本分析相结合的方法对《更路簿》与潭门地方性的建构和再现进行案例分析,探究文本与地方性之间的关系和作用。研究发现:①内容记载是文本与地方性作用的首要维度,独特地方性内容的再现是地方性挖掘的必要前提;②价值表征是文本参与地方性构建的象征基础,文本的价值基于且超越于文本的内容,与其所处的社会环境密切相关;③象征解译是文本参与地方性构建的重要方式,文本的意义价值体系不仅内含创作者或创作群体的语气,还包括"他者"群体对于文本价值的认知和阐释;④文本与地方性建构和再现之间的作用是相互的,地方文化符号和品牌的形成反之可促进对文本的保护。
New cultural geography advocates that geography exists in the text. This paper regards 13 transcripts of Genglubu found in Tanmen Town as the research text, and uses the content analysis method as well as the textual analysis method to do the research. This paper presents a case study which analyzes the relationship between "Genglubu" and the construction and reproduction of Tanmen's placeness through three dimensions. Here are some findings as follows. First, fishermen in Tanmen have geocoded the South China Sea's seascape in their own distinctive way according to the records in "Genglubu" which constitutes the unique local knowledge system of the text. Then, "Genglubu" was created by local fishermen in Tanmen on the need of navigation in ancient times. Nowadays, this document material has been regarded as the representation of the local knowledge about the South China Sea accumulated by the fishermen in historical period. What's more, different groups of people identify and interpret "Genglubu" in diverse ways. The meaning of "Genglubu" not only plays a role in the fishermen's identity construction, but also makes itself a cultural symbol and takes part in the reproduction of Tanmen's local landscape. There are some conclusions about the new relationship or the interaction between text and placeness enlightened by this case study as follows: Firstly, the text content itself is the primary dimension while analyzing how the text takes part in the construction of placeness. Only the distinctive content recorded in the text can make it unique as one of the local characteristics, and a tool to identify local place's personality.Secondly, the meaning system of text is the essential element to construct and reproduce the placeness of a place. Whether the text has historical or cultural meaning is based on, rather than determined by its content. The value of the text is not just the literal denotation, but a special connotation in a certain social context. Thirdly, the interpretation of the text's symbolic meaning by different groups of people is an important way for people to make use of the text in constructing and reproducing the placeness. It is worth noting that the value system of the text not only contains the voice of the inventor or creative group, but also involves how other people or cultural groups identify, recognize, and interpret the text meaning. Finally, the text interacts with the placeness' construction and reproduction. The text with local distinct historical records can construct and represent the placeness, and the development of placeness impacts the meaning of local text conversely. As a cultural symbol or a local historical attraction, the text makes a difference in contributing to the local economic development. In return, the text can gain more attention from local groups and be better protected due to its economic value.
New cultural geography advocates that geography exists in the text. This paper regards 13 transcripts of Genglubu found in Tanmen Town as the research text, and uses the content analysis method as well as the textual analysis method to do the research. This paper presents a case study which analyzes the relationship between "Genglubu" and the construction and reproduction of Tanmen's placeness through three dimensions. Here are some findings as follows. First, fishermen in Tanmen have geocoded the South China Sea's seascape in their own distinctive way according to the records in "Genglubu" which constitutes the unique local knowledge system of the text. Then, "Genglubu" was created by local fishermen in Tanmen on the need of navigation in ancient times. Nowadays, this document material has been regarded as the representation of the local knowledge about the South China Sea accumulated by the fishermen in historical period. What's more, different groups of people identify and interpret "Genglubu" in diverse ways. The meaning of "Genglubu" not only plays a role in the fishermen's identity construction, but also makes itself a cultural symbol and takes part in the reproduction of Tanmen's local landscape. There are some conclusions about the new relationship or the interaction between text and placeness enlightened by this case study as follows: Firstly, the text content itself is the primary dimension while analyzing how the text takes part in the construction of placeness. Only the distinctive content recorded in the text can make it unique as one of the local characteristics, and a tool to identify local place's personality.Secondly, the meaning system of text is the essential element to construct and reproduce the placeness of a place. Whether the text has historical or cultural meaning is based on, rather than determined by its content. The value of the text is not just the literal denotation, but a special connotation in a certain social context. Thirdly, the interpretation of the text's symbolic meaning by different groups of people is an important way for people to make use of the text in constructing and reproducing the placeness. It is worth noting that the value system of the text not only contains the voice of the inventor or creative group, but also involves how other people or cultural groups identify, recognize, and interpret the text meaning. Finally, the text interacts with the placeness' construction and reproduction. The text with local distinct historical records can construct and represent the placeness, and the development of placeness impacts the meaning of local text conversely. As a cultural symbol or a local historical attraction, the text makes a difference in contributing to the local economic development. In return, the text can gain more attention from local groups and be better protected due to its economic value.
引文
[1]Goodier J.A Dictionary of Human Geography.Oxford:Oxford University Press,2014.
[2]周尚意.四层一体:发掘传统乡村地方性的方法.旅游学刊,2017,32(1):6-7.[Zhou Shangyi.Four layers:The method to explore the placeness of traditional village.Tourism Tribune,2017,32(1):6-7.]
[3]周尚意,杨鸿雁,孔翔.地方性形成机制的结构主义与人文主义分析:以798和M50两个艺术区在城市地方性塑造中的作用为例.地理研究,2011,30(9):1566-1576.[Zhou Shangyi,Yang Hongyan,Kong Xiang.The structuralistic and humanistic mechanism of placeness:A case study of 798 and M50 art districts.Geographical Research,2011,30(9):1566-1576.]
[4]Yifu Tuan.Space and Place:The Perspective of Experience.Minnesota:University of Minnesota Press,2001.
[5]杜芳娟,袁振杰.务川龙潭仡佬族民族身份的地方性建构.热带地理,2014,34(4):438-444.[Du Fangjuan,Yuan Zhenjie.Ethnic identity and placeness of Gelao minority in the Longtan village,Wuchuan county.Tropical Geography,2014,34(4):438-444.]
[6]胡宪洋,白凯.拉萨八廓街地方性的游客认同建构.地理学报,2015,70(10):1632-1649.[Hu Xianyang,Bai Kai.The construction of tourists'placeness identity of Barkhor Street in Lhasa.Acta Geographica Sinica,2015,70(10):1632-1649.]
[7]钱俊希,杨槿,朱竑.现代性语境下地方性与身份认同的建构:以拉萨“藏漂”群体为例.地理学报,2015,70(8):1281-1295.[Qian Junxi,Yang Jin,Zhu Hong.The construction of placeness and identity in the context of China's emerging modernity:A case study of Han Chinese"drifters"in Lhasa,Tibet.Acta Geographica Sinica,2015,70(8):1281-1295.]
[8]张中华,段瀚.基于Amos的环境地方性与游客地方感之间的关系机理分析:以西安大明宫国家考古遗址公园为例.旅游科学,2014,28(4):81-94.[Zhang Zhonghua,Duan Han.Analysis on the relation mechanism between environmental locality and tourists'sense of place based on Amos 7.0 platform:A case study of Xi'an Daming Palace National Archaeological Park.Tourism Science,2014,28(4):81-94.]
[9]钱俊希,钱丽芸,朱竑.“全球的地方感”理论述评与广州案例解读.人文地理,2011,26(6):40-44.[Qian Junxi,Qian Liyun,Zhu Hong.A global sense of place:Theoretical framework and a case study of Guangzhou.Human Geography,2011,26(6):40-44.]
[10]汪芳,李薇,PROMINSKI Martin.城镇化和地方性的新冲突、新策略与新探索:中德双边研讨会会议综述.地理研究,2014,33(11):2205-2214.[Wang Fang,Li Wei,PROMINSKI Martin.The new conflicts,strategies and explorations of urbanization and locality:Overview on the Sino-German Symposium.Geographical Research,2014,33(11):2205-2214.]
[11]姜辽,苏勤.旅游对古镇地方性的影响研究:基于周庄的多案例考察.地理科学,2016,36(5):766-771.[Jiang Liao,Su Qin.The impact of tourism to placeness in ancient town:Multiple cases in Zhouzhuang.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2016,36(5):766-771.]
[12]迈克?克朗.文化地理学.杨淑华,宋慧敏译.南京:南京大学出版社,2003.[Mike Crang.Cultural Geography.Translated by Yang Shuhua,Song Huimin.Nanjing:Nanjing University Press,2003.]
[13]Fuchs S.History and heritage of two midwestern towns:A toponymic-material approach.Journal of Historical Geography,2015,48:11-25.
[14]Elden S.Place symbolism and land politics in Beowulf.Cultural Geographies,2009,16(4):447-463.
[15]David Tavares,Marc Brosseau.The representation of Mongolia in contemporary travel writing:Imaginative geographies of a travellers'frontier.Social&Cultural Geography,2006,7(2):299-317.
[16]Jackson P.Maps of meaning:An introduction to cultural geography.Geographical Review,1990,80(4):446.
[17]Smith D,Woodrow M,Vodden K.A boat perspective:Local geographic knowledge of fish harvesters in change Islands,Newfoundland.Journal of Cultural Geography,2016,33(1):1-26.
[18]钱俊希,朱竑.新文化地理学的理论统一性与话题多样性.地理研究,2015,34(3):422-436.[Qian Junxi,Zhu Hong.Theoretical unity and thematic diversity in new cultural geography.Geographical Research,2015,34(3):422-436.]
[19]张鸿声,吴鹏.国家性与地方性:开封城市叙述的两种文本传统.郑州大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2012,(6):125-130.[Zhang Hongsheng,Wu Peng.Nationality and locality:Two textual traditions in Kaifeng.Journal of Zhengzhou University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition,2012,(6):125-130.]
[20]鄂尔多斯学研究会.论地方学建设与发展:中国地方学建设与发展研讨会文集.鄂尔多斯:鄂尔多斯学研究会,2013.[Erdos Institute.On the Construction and Development of Local Studies:A Seminar on the Construction and Development of Chinese Local Studies.Erdos:Erdos Institute,2013.]
[21]唐顺英,周尚意.浅析文本在地方性形成中的作用:对近年文化地理学核心刊物中相关文章的梳理.地理科学,2011,31(10):1159-1165.[Tang Shunying,Zhou Shangyi.Roles of text in placeness construction:Analysis on core literature of cultural geography in recent years.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2011,31(10):1159-1165.]
[22]唐顺英,周尚意.文本在游客地方感建构中的作用研究:基于曲阜游记的分析.地理与地理信息科学,2013,29(2):104-108.[Tang Shunying,Zhou Shangyi.Roles of texts in the construction of tourists sense of place:Analysis on Qufu travel writings.Geography and Geo-Information Science,2013,29(2):104-108.]
[23]唐顺英,周尚意.影视表征对多伦多老酿酒厂区地方性的影响.城市与区域规划研究,2011,(3):169-175.[Tang Shunying,Zhou Shangyi.Impact to the placeness of a distillery district in Toronto by visual representation in the movies and televisions.Journal of Urban and Regional Planning,2011,(3):169-175.]
[24]刘南威.中国古代对南海诸岛的命名.地理科学,1994,14(2):101-108.[Liu Nanwei.Ancient Chinese naming of the South China Sea Islands.Scientia Geographica Sinica,1994,14(2):101-108.]
[25]夏代云,牟琦,何宇阳.海南渔民《更路簿》的时代考证和文化特征.中南民族大学学报:人文社会科学版,2016,36(5):54-59.[Xia Daiyun,Mu Qi,He Yuyang.The temporal and cultural characteristics research about Fishermen's Genglubu in Hainan.Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities:Humanities and Social Sciences,2016,36(5):54-59.]
[26]Paul C Adams,Steven Hoelscher,Karen E Till,et al.Textures of Place:Exploring Humanist Geographies.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press,2001.
[27]游美惠.內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用.調查研究:方法與應用,2000,(8):5-42.[You Meihui.Content analysis,textual analysis and discourse analysis in social research.Survey Research:Method and Application,2000,(8):5-42.]
[2]周尚意.四层一体:发掘传统乡村地方性的方法.旅游学刊,2017,32(1):6-7.[Zhou Shangyi.Four layers:The method to explore the placeness of traditional village.Tourism Tribune,2017,32(1):6-7.]
[3]周尚意,杨鸿雁,孔翔.地方性形成机制的结构主义与人文主义分析:以798和M50两个艺术区在城市地方性塑造中的作用为例.地理研究,2011,30(9):1566-1576.[Zhou Shangyi,Yang Hongyan,Kong Xiang.The structuralistic and humanistic mechanism of placeness:A case study of 798 and M50 art districts.Geographical Research,2011,30(9):1566-1576.]
[4]Yifu Tuan.Space and Place:The Perspective of Experience.Minnesota:University of Minnesota Press,2001.
[5]杜芳娟,袁振杰.务川龙潭仡佬族民族身份的地方性建构.热带地理,2014,34(4):438-444.[Du Fangjuan,Yuan Zhenjie.Ethnic identity and placeness of Gelao minority in the Longtan village,Wuchuan county.Tropical Geography,2014,34(4):438-444.]
[6]胡宪洋,白凯.拉萨八廓街地方性的游客认同建构.地理学报,2015,70(10):1632-1649.[Hu Xianyang,Bai Kai.The construction of tourists'placeness identity of Barkhor Street in Lhasa.Acta Geographica Sinica,2015,70(10):1632-1649.]
[7]钱俊希,杨槿,朱竑.现代性语境下地方性与身份认同的建构:以拉萨“藏漂”群体为例.地理学报,2015,70(8):1281-1295.[Qian Junxi,Yang Jin,Zhu Hong.The construction of placeness and identity in the context of China's emerging modernity:A case study of Han Chinese"drifters"in Lhasa,Tibet.Acta Geographica Sinica,2015,70(8):1281-1295.]
[8]张中华,段瀚.基于Amos的环境地方性与游客地方感之间的关系机理分析:以西安大明宫国家考古遗址公园为例.旅游科学,2014,28(4):81-94.[Zhang Zhonghua,Duan Han.Analysis on the relation mechanism between environmental locality and tourists'sense of place based on Amos 7.0 platform:A case study of Xi'an Daming Palace National Archaeological Park.Tourism Science,2014,28(4):81-94.]
[9]钱俊希,钱丽芸,朱竑.“全球的地方感”理论述评与广州案例解读.人文地理,2011,26(6):40-44.[Qian Junxi,Qian Liyun,Zhu Hong.A global sense of place:Theoretical framework and a case study of Guangzhou.Human Geography,2011,26(6):40-44.]
[10]汪芳,李薇,PROMINSKI Martin.城镇化和地方性的新冲突、新策略与新探索:中德双边研讨会会议综述.地理研究,2014,33(11):2205-2214.[Wang Fang,Li Wei,PROMINSKI Martin.The new conflicts,strategies and explorations of urbanization and locality:Overview on the Sino-German Symposium.Geographical Research,2014,33(11):2205-2214.]
[11]姜辽,苏勤.旅游对古镇地方性的影响研究:基于周庄的多案例考察.地理科学,2016,36(5):766-771.[Jiang Liao,Su Qin.The impact of tourism to placeness in ancient town:Multiple cases in Zhouzhuang.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2016,36(5):766-771.]
[12]迈克?克朗.文化地理学.杨淑华,宋慧敏译.南京:南京大学出版社,2003.[Mike Crang.Cultural Geography.Translated by Yang Shuhua,Song Huimin.Nanjing:Nanjing University Press,2003.]
[13]Fuchs S.History and heritage of two midwestern towns:A toponymic-material approach.Journal of Historical Geography,2015,48:11-25.
[14]Elden S.Place symbolism and land politics in Beowulf.Cultural Geographies,2009,16(4):447-463.
[15]David Tavares,Marc Brosseau.The representation of Mongolia in contemporary travel writing:Imaginative geographies of a travellers'frontier.Social&Cultural Geography,2006,7(2):299-317.
[16]Jackson P.Maps of meaning:An introduction to cultural geography.Geographical Review,1990,80(4):446.
[17]Smith D,Woodrow M,Vodden K.A boat perspective:Local geographic knowledge of fish harvesters in change Islands,Newfoundland.Journal of Cultural Geography,2016,33(1):1-26.
[18]钱俊希,朱竑.新文化地理学的理论统一性与话题多样性.地理研究,2015,34(3):422-436.[Qian Junxi,Zhu Hong.Theoretical unity and thematic diversity in new cultural geography.Geographical Research,2015,34(3):422-436.]
[19]张鸿声,吴鹏.国家性与地方性:开封城市叙述的两种文本传统.郑州大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2012,(6):125-130.[Zhang Hongsheng,Wu Peng.Nationality and locality:Two textual traditions in Kaifeng.Journal of Zhengzhou University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition,2012,(6):125-130.]
[20]鄂尔多斯学研究会.论地方学建设与发展:中国地方学建设与发展研讨会文集.鄂尔多斯:鄂尔多斯学研究会,2013.[Erdos Institute.On the Construction and Development of Local Studies:A Seminar on the Construction and Development of Chinese Local Studies.Erdos:Erdos Institute,2013.]
[21]唐顺英,周尚意.浅析文本在地方性形成中的作用:对近年文化地理学核心刊物中相关文章的梳理.地理科学,2011,31(10):1159-1165.[Tang Shunying,Zhou Shangyi.Roles of text in placeness construction:Analysis on core literature of cultural geography in recent years.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2011,31(10):1159-1165.]
[22]唐顺英,周尚意.文本在游客地方感建构中的作用研究:基于曲阜游记的分析.地理与地理信息科学,2013,29(2):104-108.[Tang Shunying,Zhou Shangyi.Roles of texts in the construction of tourists sense of place:Analysis on Qufu travel writings.Geography and Geo-Information Science,2013,29(2):104-108.]
[23]唐顺英,周尚意.影视表征对多伦多老酿酒厂区地方性的影响.城市与区域规划研究,2011,(3):169-175.[Tang Shunying,Zhou Shangyi.Impact to the placeness of a distillery district in Toronto by visual representation in the movies and televisions.Journal of Urban and Regional Planning,2011,(3):169-175.]
[24]刘南威.中国古代对南海诸岛的命名.地理科学,1994,14(2):101-108.[Liu Nanwei.Ancient Chinese naming of the South China Sea Islands.Scientia Geographica Sinica,1994,14(2):101-108.]
[25]夏代云,牟琦,何宇阳.海南渔民《更路簿》的时代考证和文化特征.中南民族大学学报:人文社会科学版,2016,36(5):54-59.[Xia Daiyun,Mu Qi,He Yuyang.The temporal and cultural characteristics research about Fishermen's Genglubu in Hainan.Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities:Humanities and Social Sciences,2016,36(5):54-59.]
[26]Paul C Adams,Steven Hoelscher,Karen E Till,et al.Textures of Place:Exploring Humanist Geographies.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press,2001.
[27]游美惠.內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用.調查研究:方法與應用,2000,(8):5-42.[You Meihui.Content analysis,textual analysis and discourse analysis in social research.Survey Research:Method and Application,2000,(8):5-42.]