滇黔桂省际边界民族地区土地资源可持续利用
|
摘要
基于经济、社会、自然环境三维视角,构建土地资源可持续利用评价指标体系,运用因子分析法和多指标综合评价法对滇黔桂省际边界民族地区28个县市(区)的土地资源可持续利用状况进行综合评价,探讨了土地资源可持续利用类型的空间区划,并运用系统聚类法加以验证和比较分析。结果表明:滇黔桂省际边界民族地区大多数县市(区)土地资源利用处于可持续利用的起步和发展阶段,土地资源可持续利用水平亟需大力提高;研究区内土地资源可持续利用水平差异明显,呈现非均衡的空间分布格局;根据土地资源可持续利用的3大类型进行空间分区发现不同类型的空间区划存在明显的跨区域性与集聚性。
To build the evaluation index system of sustainable utilization of land resources based on three-dimensional perspective of economy, society and environment, then giving a comprehensive evaluation of sustainable utilization of land resources of the 28 counties(cities or districts) in the ethnic areas of inter-provincial boundary of Yunnan, Guizhou and Guangxi in 2014 by using factor analysis method and multi-index comprehensive evaluation method. Meanwhile, the types of sustainable utilization of land resources are discussed in depth, and it is to validate and make a comparative analysis by applying the system clustering method. The results showed as follow: 1)The utilization of land resources in most counties(cities or districts) of the ethnic areas of inter-provincial boundary of Yunnan, Guizhou and Guangxi, which is in the initial stage and development stage of sustainable utilization, so that the level of sustainable use of land resources urgently needs to be improved. 2) There are obvious differences in the sustainable utilization level of land resources in the study area, showing an unbalanced spatial distribution pattern. 3) According to the three types of sustainable utilization of land resources, it can be found that there are obvious cross-regional or agglomeration of different types of spatial division.
To build the evaluation index system of sustainable utilization of land resources based on three-dimensional perspective of economy, society and environment, then giving a comprehensive evaluation of sustainable utilization of land resources of the 28 counties(cities or districts) in the ethnic areas of inter-provincial boundary of Yunnan, Guizhou and Guangxi in 2014 by using factor analysis method and multi-index comprehensive evaluation method. Meanwhile, the types of sustainable utilization of land resources are discussed in depth, and it is to validate and make a comparative analysis by applying the system clustering method. The results showed as follow: 1)The utilization of land resources in most counties(cities or districts) of the ethnic areas of inter-provincial boundary of Yunnan, Guizhou and Guangxi, which is in the initial stage and development stage of sustainable utilization, so that the level of sustainable use of land resources urgently needs to be improved. 2) There are obvious differences in the sustainable utilization level of land resources in the study area, showing an unbalanced spatial distribution pattern. 3) According to the three types of sustainable utilization of land resources, it can be found that there are obvious cross-regional or agglomeration of different types of spatial division.
引文
[1] FAO. An international framework for evaluating sustainable land management[R]. World Soil Resources Reports 73,1993.
[2] Dewan,A. M,Yamaguchi,Y. Using remote sensing and GIS to detect and monitor land use and land cover change in Dhaka Metropolitan of Bangladesh during 1960-2005[J]. Environmen‐tal Monitoring and Assessment,2009,150(1):237-249.
[3] Paassen,A. V,Roetter,R. P,Keulen,H. V,et al. Can computer models stimulate learning about sustainable land use? Experi‐ence with LUPAS in the humid(sub-)tropics of Asia[J]. Agri‐cultural Systems,2007,94(3):874-887.
[4] Jankauskas B,Tiknius A. Sustainable and environment friendly land use systems for undulating reliefs of the temperate climate zone[J]. Ecosystem Supply,2004,42(5):50-59.
[5] Geneletti,D,Bagli S,Napolitano P,et al. Spatial decision support for strategic environmental assessment of land use plans:A case study in southern Italy[J]. Environmental Impact Assess‐ment Review,2007,27(7):408-423.
[6] Rega C,SEA and ecological compensation in land use plans[J].IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics,2011,35(6):970-976.
[7] Hosono A,Rocha C M C,Hongo Y. Environment-Friendly Land Use of the Cerrado[M]. Palgrave Macmillan UK,2016.
[8]周立三.中国农业地理和土地利用的近期研究[J].地理学报,1990,45(2):146-153.
[9]郭焕成,靖学青.土地利用研究的背景、任务及发展趋势[J].地理学与国土研究,1996,12(3):6-11.
[10]倪绍祥.近10年来中国土地评价研究的进展[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(6):672-683.
[11] Pytrik R,Hammes K,Feng S Y,et al. Methods and tools for integrated assessment of land use policies on sustainable devel‐opment in developing countries[J]. Land Use Policy,2011(28):604-617.
[12]班茂盛,方创琳,刘晓丽,等.北京高新技术产业土地利用绩效综合评价[J].地理学报,2008,63(2):175-184.
[13]吴一洲,吴次芳,罗文斌,等.浙江省城市土地利用绩效的空间格局及其机理研究[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(10):41-46.
[14]陈士银,周飞,吴学彪.基于绩效模型的区域土地利用可持续性评价[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(6):249-253.
[15]瞿忠琼,濮励杰,黄贤金.中国城市土地供给制度绩效评价指标体系的建立及其应用研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2006,16(2):51-57.
[16]刘庆,陈利根.长株潭地区土地可持续利用综合评价及空间分区[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(6):245-253.
[17]赵艳,濮励杰,张健,等.基于三角模型的城市土地可持续利用评价——以江苏省无锡市为例[J].经济地理,2011,31(5):810-815,838.
[18]孙雁,刘友兆.基于细碎化的土地资源可持续利用评价——以江西分宜县为例[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(5):802-810.
[19]孙久文.《省际边界区域协调发展研究》简评[J].地理学报,2012,67(10):1 438.
[20]魏后凯.《行政区边缘经济论》评介[J].中国工业经济,2004(11):112.
[21]焦世泰.滇黔桂省际边界民族地区整合发展研究[J].广西民族研究,2014(4):164-169.
[22]陈景信,代明,洪业应.西南地区人口现代化现状及其发展对策[J].生产力研究,2014(10):85-87.
[23]李瑞玲,王世杰,熊康宁,等.喀斯特石漠化评价指标体系探讨[J].热带地理,2004(2):145-149.
[24]宋小青,欧阳竹. 1999—2007年中国粮食安全的关键影响因素[J].地理学报,2012,67(6):793-803.
[25]何晓群.现代统计分析方法与应用[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
[26]杨星,蔡彦,郭璐.广东省土地资源可持续利用评价研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2005,15(3):65-68.
[2] Dewan,A. M,Yamaguchi,Y. Using remote sensing and GIS to detect and monitor land use and land cover change in Dhaka Metropolitan of Bangladesh during 1960-2005[J]. Environmen‐tal Monitoring and Assessment,2009,150(1):237-249.
[3] Paassen,A. V,Roetter,R. P,Keulen,H. V,et al. Can computer models stimulate learning about sustainable land use? Experi‐ence with LUPAS in the humid(sub-)tropics of Asia[J]. Agri‐cultural Systems,2007,94(3):874-887.
[4] Jankauskas B,Tiknius A. Sustainable and environment friendly land use systems for undulating reliefs of the temperate climate zone[J]. Ecosystem Supply,2004,42(5):50-59.
[5] Geneletti,D,Bagli S,Napolitano P,et al. Spatial decision support for strategic environmental assessment of land use plans:A case study in southern Italy[J]. Environmental Impact Assess‐ment Review,2007,27(7):408-423.
[6] Rega C,SEA and ecological compensation in land use plans[J].IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics,2011,35(6):970-976.
[7] Hosono A,Rocha C M C,Hongo Y. Environment-Friendly Land Use of the Cerrado[M]. Palgrave Macmillan UK,2016.
[8]周立三.中国农业地理和土地利用的近期研究[J].地理学报,1990,45(2):146-153.
[9]郭焕成,靖学青.土地利用研究的背景、任务及发展趋势[J].地理学与国土研究,1996,12(3):6-11.
[10]倪绍祥.近10年来中国土地评价研究的进展[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(6):672-683.
[11] Pytrik R,Hammes K,Feng S Y,et al. Methods and tools for integrated assessment of land use policies on sustainable devel‐opment in developing countries[J]. Land Use Policy,2011(28):604-617.
[12]班茂盛,方创琳,刘晓丽,等.北京高新技术产业土地利用绩效综合评价[J].地理学报,2008,63(2):175-184.
[13]吴一洲,吴次芳,罗文斌,等.浙江省城市土地利用绩效的空间格局及其机理研究[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(10):41-46.
[14]陈士银,周飞,吴学彪.基于绩效模型的区域土地利用可持续性评价[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(6):249-253.
[15]瞿忠琼,濮励杰,黄贤金.中国城市土地供给制度绩效评价指标体系的建立及其应用研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2006,16(2):51-57.
[16]刘庆,陈利根.长株潭地区土地可持续利用综合评价及空间分区[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(6):245-253.
[17]赵艳,濮励杰,张健,等.基于三角模型的城市土地可持续利用评价——以江苏省无锡市为例[J].经济地理,2011,31(5):810-815,838.
[18]孙雁,刘友兆.基于细碎化的土地资源可持续利用评价——以江西分宜县为例[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(5):802-810.
[19]孙久文.《省际边界区域协调发展研究》简评[J].地理学报,2012,67(10):1 438.
[20]魏后凯.《行政区边缘经济论》评介[J].中国工业经济,2004(11):112.
[21]焦世泰.滇黔桂省际边界民族地区整合发展研究[J].广西民族研究,2014(4):164-169.
[22]陈景信,代明,洪业应.西南地区人口现代化现状及其发展对策[J].生产力研究,2014(10):85-87.
[23]李瑞玲,王世杰,熊康宁,等.喀斯特石漠化评价指标体系探讨[J].热带地理,2004(2):145-149.
[24]宋小青,欧阳竹. 1999—2007年中国粮食安全的关键影响因素[J].地理学报,2012,67(6):793-803.
[25]何晓群.现代统计分析方法与应用[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
[26]杨星,蔡彦,郭璐.广东省土地资源可持续利用评价研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2005,15(3):65-68.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |