流动性视角下流动家庭的空间实践和情感重构
|
摘要
流动性的增强使迁移活动达到前所未有的广度和强度,"家"的流动日渐成为重要的流动形式,"家"的流动亦成为流动性研究的重要关注点。在新型城镇化进程中,伴随着家庭式迁移的发展浪潮,流动家庭的空间实践和情感重构成为一个重要话题。在流动过程中,移民的流动性实践往往赋予了"家"不断转换和流动的意义和内涵。基于流动性理论视角,延循"家"的地理学脉络,选取两个典型的流动家庭案例,通过质性研究方法分析对比其在流动过程中的空间实践及其对"家"的情感建构与重构的影响。研究发现:时间性、空间性和地方性是研究"家的流动性"的重要变量和维度。作为刻画流动性的基础尺标,流动轨迹的多位移空间性和流动过程的多阶段时间性使得"家"的地方性处于一个动态关联的状态。"家"的情感归属、"家"的观念和意义通过"家"的流动和营造实践在解构中被延续与重建。
Along with the unprecedented breadth and intensity of migrating activities motivated by the increasing mobility, family(as one of the most significant and nearly the smallest geographical unit) migration has become the most important pattern of migration in China, and in so doing the migration studies related to family has also been identified as an unreplaceable topic in mobility studies. Accompanied with this wave of family migration, in particular in the context of China's new urbanization, an increasing number of scholarships have intensively focused on the topics themed on migrated family's spatial practices and their emotional belongings. In the process of migrated family's mobilities, the meaning of the space "home" has been being continuously contested by the practices of mobilized families. By using the theoretical perspective of mobility, as well as the research line of the geography of home, this paper adopts the methods of qualitative and comparative case study(based on two typical cases of migrated families) to discuss the impact of migration on the mobilizing families' spatial practices and emotional reconstruction. The main finding indicates that the temporality,spatiality and placeness are several very important variables and dimensions of the study of mobility. As a fundamental ruler for characterizing the mobility, the multi-displacement spatiality of the flowing trajectory and the multi-stage temporality of the flowing process make the locality of the home being in a status of dynamic correlation. In this regard, the emotional belonging of home and the concept and the meaning of home are prolonged and reconstructed in the process of family migrations and related family-making practices. This empirical article provides a vivid description of local practices for the geography of "home" in China, and hopefully it can be contributed to promoting the theoretical progress of geography of home.
Along with the unprecedented breadth and intensity of migrating activities motivated by the increasing mobility, family(as one of the most significant and nearly the smallest geographical unit) migration has become the most important pattern of migration in China, and in so doing the migration studies related to family has also been identified as an unreplaceable topic in mobility studies. Accompanied with this wave of family migration, in particular in the context of China's new urbanization, an increasing number of scholarships have intensively focused on the topics themed on migrated family's spatial practices and their emotional belongings. In the process of migrated family's mobilities, the meaning of the space "home" has been being continuously contested by the practices of mobilized families. By using the theoretical perspective of mobility, as well as the research line of the geography of home, this paper adopts the methods of qualitative and comparative case study(based on two typical cases of migrated families) to discuss the impact of migration on the mobilizing families' spatial practices and emotional reconstruction. The main finding indicates that the temporality,spatiality and placeness are several very important variables and dimensions of the study of mobility. As a fundamental ruler for characterizing the mobility, the multi-displacement spatiality of the flowing trajectory and the multi-stage temporality of the flowing process make the locality of the home being in a status of dynamic correlation. In this regard, the emotional belonging of home and the concept and the meaning of home are prolonged and reconstructed in the process of family migrations and related family-making practices. This empirical article provides a vivid description of local practices for the geography of "home" in China, and hopefully it can be contributed to promoting the theoretical progress of geography of home.
引文
[1] National Health and Family Planning Commission, Mobile Population Division, Report on China Migrant Population Development 2015. Beijing:China Population Publishing House, 2015.[国家卫生和计划生育委员会流动人口司.2015年中国流动人口发展报告.北京:中国人口出版社, 2015.]
[2] Duan Chengrong, Yang Ge, Zhang Fei, et al. 9 trends of floating population change since the reform and opening up.Population Research, 2008, 32(6):30-43.[段成荣,杨舸,张斐,等.改革开放以来我国流动人口变动的九大趋势.人口研究, 2008, 32(6):30-43.]
[3] Sheng Yinan. Family migration in China. Population Research, 2013, 37(4):66-79.[盛亦男.中国流动人口家庭化迁居.人口研究, 2013, 37(4):66-79.]
[4] Chen Xianshou, Sun Lihua. Analysis and countermeasures of familization of migration in Wuhan. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 1996(5):44-47.[陈贤寿,孙丽华.武汉市流动人口家庭化分析及对策思考.中国人口科学, 1996(5):44-47.]
[5] Tang Xueqiong, Yang Xihao, Qian Junxi. Meanings and practices of borders from the perspective of cross-border mobility:A case study of village X, Hekou, Yunnan at the Sino-Vietnamese borderlands. Geographical Research, 2016,35(8):1535-1546.[唐雪琼,杨茜好,钱俊希.流动性视角下边界的空间实践及其意义:以云南省河口县中越边境地区X村为例.地理研究, 2016, 35(8):1535-1546.]
[6] Zhang Chaozhi, Zhang Xin. Constructing a mobile travel experience model:Empirical study of cyclists travelling to Tibet. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(12):2332-2342.[张朝枝,张鑫.流动性的旅游体验模型建构:基于骑行入藏者的研究.地理研究, 2017, 36(12):2332-2342.]
[7] Wu Yinshan, Chen Jiaxi, Qian Junxi. The experiences, practices and meanings from the perspective of mobilities:A case study of the train travel to Tibet. Tourism Tribune, 2017, 32(12):17-27.[吴寅姗,陈家熙,钱俊希.流动性视角下的入藏火车旅行研究:体验、实践、意义.旅游学刊, 2017, 32(12):17-27.]
[8] Fei Xiaotong. Rural China. Shanghai:Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2007.[费孝通.乡土中国.上海:上海人民出版社, 2007.]
[9] Ma Guoqing. Permanent Home:Traditional Inertia and Social Integration. Beijing:Peking University Press, 2009.[麻国庆.永远的家:传统惯性与社会结合.北京:北京大学出版社, 2009.]
[10] Deng Weizhi, Xu Rong. Family Sociology. Beijing:China Social Science Press, 2001.[邓伟志,徐榕.家庭社会学.北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2001.]
[11] Pan Yunkang. Family in Social Change:Family Sociology. Tianjin:Tianjin Academy of Social Sciences, 2002.[潘允康.社会变迁中的家庭:家庭社会学.天津:天津社会科学院出版社, 2002.]
[12] Deng Weizhi, Xu Xin. Introduction to Family Sociology. Shanghai:Shanghai University Press, 2006.[邓伟志,徐新.家庭社会学导论.上海:上海大学出版社, 2006.]
[13] Zhu Qiang. Sociology of Family. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science&Technology Press, 2012.[朱强.家庭社会学.武汉:华中科技大学出版社, 2012.]
[14] Zhang Yinghua, Yu Ruorong. The persistence and change of family structure:A comparison of the living arrangement of the aged between Chinese mainland southeast and Taiwan region. Sociological Studies, 2014(3):167-188.[章英华,于若蓉.家庭结构的持续与变迁:海峡两岸老年人居住安排的比较.社会学研究, 2014(3):167-188.]
[15] Wang Yuesheng. Theoretical analysis of the intergenerational relations of Chinese families. Population Research, 2008(4):13-21.[王跃生.中国家庭代际关系的理论分析.人口研究, 2008(4):13-21.]
[16] Wang Yuesheng. Institution and its influence on family members living together or dividing in Chinese History. Journal of Social Sciences, 2013(7):70-82.[王跃生.中国传统家庭合与分的制度考察.社会科学, 2013(7):70-82.]
[17] Wang Yuesheng. Study on the family type of urban and rural residents in China:Based on the analysis of the sixth census data. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2014(1):20-32.[王跃生.中国城乡老年人居住的家庭类型研究:基于第六次人口普查数据的分析.中国人口科学, 2014(1):20-32.]
[18] Wang Yuesheng. Social change and contemporary Chinese rural marriage family change:A preliminary theoretical analysis framework. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2002(4):25-35.[王跃生.社会变革与当代中国农村婚姻家庭变动:一个初步的理论分析框架.中国人口科学, 2002(4):25-35.]
[19] Shi Zhilei, Yang Yunyan. Fertility intention and fertility behavior in Hubei Province under the New Two-child Policy.Population Research, 2014, 38(5):27-40.[石智雷,杨云彦.符合“单独二孩”政策家庭的生育意愿与生育行为.人口研究, 2014, 38(5):27-40.]
[20] Ci Qinying, Zhou Dongxia. Addressing"De-specialization"of the policy of families lost only chid:Based upon rethinking media construction of such families. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2015(2):34-42.[慈勤英,周冬霞.失独家庭政策“去特殊化”探讨:基于媒介失独家庭社会形象建构的反思.中国人口科学, 2015(2):34-42.]
[21] Ma Xia. Chinese migration pattern and transition. Social Sciences in China, 1990(5):141-154.[马侠.中国人口迁移模式及其转变.中国社会科学, 1990(5):141-154.]
[22] Wang Yuesheng. A comparison of changes in the modern Chinese family structure between urban and rural areas.Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2006, 26(3):118-136.[王跃生.当代中国城乡家庭结构变动比较.社会, 2006, 26(3):118-136.]
[23] Yang Juhua, Chen Chuanbo. The process of familization of migration in China. Popolation and Development, 2013, 19(3):2-13.[杨菊华,陈传波.流动人口家庭化的现状与特点:流动过程特征分析.人口与发展, 2013, 19(3):2-13.]
[24] Sheng Yinan. The determinants of whole family migration and migration behaviors decision. Popolation Journal, 2014,36(3):71-84.[盛亦男.流动人口家庭化迁居水平与迁居行为决策的影响因素研究.人口学刊, 2014, 36(3):71-84.]
[25] Feng Dan, Li Peng, Zhu Hong. Progress in geographic studies on"home"and implications for China. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(7):809-817.[封丹,李鹏,朱竑.国外“家”的地理学研究进展及启示.地理科学进展, 2015, 34(7):809-817.]
[26] Papastergiadis N. Dialogues in the Diasporas:Essays and Conversations on Cultural Identity. London:Rivers Oram Press, 1998.
[27] Blunt A, Varley A. Geographies of home. Cultural Geographies, 2004, 11(1):3-6.
[28] Malkki L. National Geographic:The rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. Cultural Anthropology, 1992, 7(1):24-44.
[29] Gorman-Murray A. Homeboys:Uses of home by gay Australian men. Social&Cultural Geography, 2006, 7(1):53-69.
[30] Gowans G. Imperial geographies of home:Memsahibs and Miss-Sahibs in India and Britain, 1915-1947. Cultural Geographies, 2003, 10(4):424-441.
[31] Longhurst R, Johnston L, Ho E. A visceral approach:Cooking"at home"with migrant women in Hamilton, New Zealand. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2009, 34(3):333-345.
[32] Ralph D, Staeheli L A. Home and migration:Mobilities, belongings and identities. Geography Compass, 2011, 5(7):517-530.
[33] Shillington L. Being(s)in relation at home:Socio-natures of patio"gardens"in Managua, Nicaragua. Social&Cultural Geography, 2008, 9(7):755-776.
[34] Bryden I."There is no outer without inner space":Constructing the haveli as home. Cultural Geography, 2004, 11(1):26-41.
[35] Dohmen R. The home in the world:Women, threshold designs and performative relations in contemporary Tamil Nadu,south India. Cultural Geography, 2004, 11(1):7-25.
[36] Nansen B, Arnold M, Gibbs M, et al. Dwelling with media stuff:Latencies and logics of materiality in four Australian homes. Environment and Planning D:Society and Space, 2011, 29(4):693-715.
[37] Su X B. Tourism, modernity and the consumption of home in China. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2014, 39(1):50-61.
[38] Su X B, Cai X M, Liu M X. Prostitution, variegated homes, and the practice of unhomely life in China. Social&Cultural Geography, 2017:1-20.
[39] Feng Dan, Zhu Hong, Breitung W. Boundary and the making of home:A cultural study of the gated communities in Guangzhou, China. World Regional Studies, 2014, 23(3):64-73.[封丹,朱竑, Breitung W.门禁社区边界和家的构建关系研究.世界地理研究, 2014, 23(3):64-73.]
[40] Yin Duo, Qian Junxi, Zhu Hong. The representation and practice of new urban district-as-home in China:A case study of Kangbashi New Town, Ordos. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(12):1517-1528.[尹铎,钱俊希,朱竑.城市新区作为“家”的表征与实践:以鄂尔多斯康巴什新区为例.地理科学进展, 2016, 35(12):1517-1528.]
[41] Tao Wei, Jiangwei, He Xin. The morphological change of vernacular dwelling gate and conceptual representation of home:A case study of Pingyao. Geographical Research, 2014, 33(12):2418-2426.[陶伟,蒋伟,何新.平遥古城民居之门的形态变迁及其家的观念表征.地理研究, 2014, 33(12):2418-2426.]
[42] Xue Ximing, Feng Dan. Home and place in a changing world:A related review. Human Geography, 2016, 31(4):9-16.[薛熙明,封丹.变动中的家与地方:一个关联性的研究综述.人文地理, 2016, 31(4):9-16.]
[43] Su X B."It is my home. I will die here":Tourism development and the politics of place in Lijiang, China. Geografiska Annaler, 2012, 94(1):31-45.
[44] He Xuefeng. Three propositions on"Human Urbanization". Shanxi Agricultural Economy, 2015(1):7-8.[贺雪峰.关于“人的城市化”的三种主张.山西农经, 2015(1):7-8.]
[45] Creswell T. On the Move:Mobility in the Modern Western World. London:Routledge, 2006.
[46] Sun Jiuxia, Zhou Shangyi, Wang Ning, et al. Mobility in geographical research:Time, space and society. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(10):1801-1818.[孙九霞,周尚意,王宁,等.跨学科聚焦的新领域:流动的时间、空间与社会.地理研究, 2016, 35(10):1801-1818.]
[47] Blunt A, Dowling R. Home. London:Routledge, 2006.
[48] Massey D. A place called home. New Formations, 1992, 17(7):3-15.
[49] Xue Yali."Family out":The phenomenon of family migration from multidimensional perspective. China Population News, 2015-05-04(3).[薜亚利.“举家外出”:家庭式迁移现象多维透视.中国人口报, 2015-05-04(3).]
[50] Li Jingneng. Modern Western Population Theory. Shanghai:Fudan University Press, 2004.[李竟能.现代西方人口理论.上海:复旦大学出版社, 2004.]
[51] Xiong Jinwei, Zhong Zhangbao. Social rationality of migrant workers'family migration. China Rural Survey, 2016(4):40-55.[熊景维,钟涨宝.农民工家庭化迁移中的社会理性.中国农村观察, 2016(4):40-55.]
[52] Schmidt-Kallert E. A new paradigm of urban transition:Tracing the livelihood strategies of multi-locational households.Die Erde, 2009, 140(3):319-336.
[53] An Fansuo, Wu Hongyu. Study on the welfare of labor, adaptation of time and willingness to permanent migrant of workers, evidence from Guangdong survey. Social Sciences in Guangdong, 2014(3):22-29.[安凡所,吴红宇.劳动权益、时间适应与外来工永久迁移意愿研究:来自广东调查的证据.广东社会科学, 2014(3):22-29.]
[54] Tuan Yi-fu. Space and Place in the Perspective of Experience. Taipei:Taipei Institute for Compilation and Translation,1998.[段义孚.经验透视中的空间与地方.台北:台北编译馆, 1998.]
[55] Bate B. Understanding the influence tenure has on meanings of home and homemaking practices. Geography Compass,2018, 12(1):1-15.
[56] Brown J. Expressions of diasporic belonging:The divergent emotional geographies of Britain's Polish communities.Emotion, Space and Society, 2011, 4(4):229-237.
[57] Zhou Xiaohong. The influence of mobility and urban experience on modernity of peasants in China. An investigation of"Zhejiang Village"in Beijing and a rural community in Wenzhou. Sociological Studies, 1998(5):60-73.[周晓虹.流动与城市体验对中国农民现代性的影响:北京“浙江村”与温州一个农村社区的考察.社会学研究, 1998(5):60-73.]
[58] Tuan Y. Topophilia:A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes and Values. New York:Columbia University Press,1990.
[59] Sun Jiuxia. Tourism as a"social form":A"local"perspective. Tourism Tribune, 2017, 32(12):12-14.[孙九霞.作为一种“社会形式”的旅游:“地方”视角.旅游学刊, 2017, 32(12):12-14.]
[60] Jin Yihong. Mobile paternal authority:Change in migrant farmer families. Social Sciences in China, 2010(4):151-165.[金一虹.流动的父权:流动农民家庭的变迁.中国社会科学, 2010(4):151-165.]
[61] Kochan D. Home is where I lay down my hat? The complexities and functions of home for internal migrants in contemporary China. Geoforum, 2016, 71:21-32.
[2] Duan Chengrong, Yang Ge, Zhang Fei, et al. 9 trends of floating population change since the reform and opening up.Population Research, 2008, 32(6):30-43.[段成荣,杨舸,张斐,等.改革开放以来我国流动人口变动的九大趋势.人口研究, 2008, 32(6):30-43.]
[3] Sheng Yinan. Family migration in China. Population Research, 2013, 37(4):66-79.[盛亦男.中国流动人口家庭化迁居.人口研究, 2013, 37(4):66-79.]
[4] Chen Xianshou, Sun Lihua. Analysis and countermeasures of familization of migration in Wuhan. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 1996(5):44-47.[陈贤寿,孙丽华.武汉市流动人口家庭化分析及对策思考.中国人口科学, 1996(5):44-47.]
[5] Tang Xueqiong, Yang Xihao, Qian Junxi. Meanings and practices of borders from the perspective of cross-border mobility:A case study of village X, Hekou, Yunnan at the Sino-Vietnamese borderlands. Geographical Research, 2016,35(8):1535-1546.[唐雪琼,杨茜好,钱俊希.流动性视角下边界的空间实践及其意义:以云南省河口县中越边境地区X村为例.地理研究, 2016, 35(8):1535-1546.]
[6] Zhang Chaozhi, Zhang Xin. Constructing a mobile travel experience model:Empirical study of cyclists travelling to Tibet. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(12):2332-2342.[张朝枝,张鑫.流动性的旅游体验模型建构:基于骑行入藏者的研究.地理研究, 2017, 36(12):2332-2342.]
[7] Wu Yinshan, Chen Jiaxi, Qian Junxi. The experiences, practices and meanings from the perspective of mobilities:A case study of the train travel to Tibet. Tourism Tribune, 2017, 32(12):17-27.[吴寅姗,陈家熙,钱俊希.流动性视角下的入藏火车旅行研究:体验、实践、意义.旅游学刊, 2017, 32(12):17-27.]
[8] Fei Xiaotong. Rural China. Shanghai:Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2007.[费孝通.乡土中国.上海:上海人民出版社, 2007.]
[9] Ma Guoqing. Permanent Home:Traditional Inertia and Social Integration. Beijing:Peking University Press, 2009.[麻国庆.永远的家:传统惯性与社会结合.北京:北京大学出版社, 2009.]
[10] Deng Weizhi, Xu Rong. Family Sociology. Beijing:China Social Science Press, 2001.[邓伟志,徐榕.家庭社会学.北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2001.]
[11] Pan Yunkang. Family in Social Change:Family Sociology. Tianjin:Tianjin Academy of Social Sciences, 2002.[潘允康.社会变迁中的家庭:家庭社会学.天津:天津社会科学院出版社, 2002.]
[12] Deng Weizhi, Xu Xin. Introduction to Family Sociology. Shanghai:Shanghai University Press, 2006.[邓伟志,徐新.家庭社会学导论.上海:上海大学出版社, 2006.]
[13] Zhu Qiang. Sociology of Family. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science&Technology Press, 2012.[朱强.家庭社会学.武汉:华中科技大学出版社, 2012.]
[14] Zhang Yinghua, Yu Ruorong. The persistence and change of family structure:A comparison of the living arrangement of the aged between Chinese mainland southeast and Taiwan region. Sociological Studies, 2014(3):167-188.[章英华,于若蓉.家庭结构的持续与变迁:海峡两岸老年人居住安排的比较.社会学研究, 2014(3):167-188.]
[15] Wang Yuesheng. Theoretical analysis of the intergenerational relations of Chinese families. Population Research, 2008(4):13-21.[王跃生.中国家庭代际关系的理论分析.人口研究, 2008(4):13-21.]
[16] Wang Yuesheng. Institution and its influence on family members living together or dividing in Chinese History. Journal of Social Sciences, 2013(7):70-82.[王跃生.中国传统家庭合与分的制度考察.社会科学, 2013(7):70-82.]
[17] Wang Yuesheng. Study on the family type of urban and rural residents in China:Based on the analysis of the sixth census data. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2014(1):20-32.[王跃生.中国城乡老年人居住的家庭类型研究:基于第六次人口普查数据的分析.中国人口科学, 2014(1):20-32.]
[18] Wang Yuesheng. Social change and contemporary Chinese rural marriage family change:A preliminary theoretical analysis framework. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2002(4):25-35.[王跃生.社会变革与当代中国农村婚姻家庭变动:一个初步的理论分析框架.中国人口科学, 2002(4):25-35.]
[19] Shi Zhilei, Yang Yunyan. Fertility intention and fertility behavior in Hubei Province under the New Two-child Policy.Population Research, 2014, 38(5):27-40.[石智雷,杨云彦.符合“单独二孩”政策家庭的生育意愿与生育行为.人口研究, 2014, 38(5):27-40.]
[20] Ci Qinying, Zhou Dongxia. Addressing"De-specialization"of the policy of families lost only chid:Based upon rethinking media construction of such families. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2015(2):34-42.[慈勤英,周冬霞.失独家庭政策“去特殊化”探讨:基于媒介失独家庭社会形象建构的反思.中国人口科学, 2015(2):34-42.]
[21] Ma Xia. Chinese migration pattern and transition. Social Sciences in China, 1990(5):141-154.[马侠.中国人口迁移模式及其转变.中国社会科学, 1990(5):141-154.]
[22] Wang Yuesheng. A comparison of changes in the modern Chinese family structure between urban and rural areas.Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2006, 26(3):118-136.[王跃生.当代中国城乡家庭结构变动比较.社会, 2006, 26(3):118-136.]
[23] Yang Juhua, Chen Chuanbo. The process of familization of migration in China. Popolation and Development, 2013, 19(3):2-13.[杨菊华,陈传波.流动人口家庭化的现状与特点:流动过程特征分析.人口与发展, 2013, 19(3):2-13.]
[24] Sheng Yinan. The determinants of whole family migration and migration behaviors decision. Popolation Journal, 2014,36(3):71-84.[盛亦男.流动人口家庭化迁居水平与迁居行为决策的影响因素研究.人口学刊, 2014, 36(3):71-84.]
[25] Feng Dan, Li Peng, Zhu Hong. Progress in geographic studies on"home"and implications for China. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(7):809-817.[封丹,李鹏,朱竑.国外“家”的地理学研究进展及启示.地理科学进展, 2015, 34(7):809-817.]
[26] Papastergiadis N. Dialogues in the Diasporas:Essays and Conversations on Cultural Identity. London:Rivers Oram Press, 1998.
[27] Blunt A, Varley A. Geographies of home. Cultural Geographies, 2004, 11(1):3-6.
[28] Malkki L. National Geographic:The rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. Cultural Anthropology, 1992, 7(1):24-44.
[29] Gorman-Murray A. Homeboys:Uses of home by gay Australian men. Social&Cultural Geography, 2006, 7(1):53-69.
[30] Gowans G. Imperial geographies of home:Memsahibs and Miss-Sahibs in India and Britain, 1915-1947. Cultural Geographies, 2003, 10(4):424-441.
[31] Longhurst R, Johnston L, Ho E. A visceral approach:Cooking"at home"with migrant women in Hamilton, New Zealand. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2009, 34(3):333-345.
[32] Ralph D, Staeheli L A. Home and migration:Mobilities, belongings and identities. Geography Compass, 2011, 5(7):517-530.
[33] Shillington L. Being(s)in relation at home:Socio-natures of patio"gardens"in Managua, Nicaragua. Social&Cultural Geography, 2008, 9(7):755-776.
[34] Bryden I."There is no outer without inner space":Constructing the haveli as home. Cultural Geography, 2004, 11(1):26-41.
[35] Dohmen R. The home in the world:Women, threshold designs and performative relations in contemporary Tamil Nadu,south India. Cultural Geography, 2004, 11(1):7-25.
[36] Nansen B, Arnold M, Gibbs M, et al. Dwelling with media stuff:Latencies and logics of materiality in four Australian homes. Environment and Planning D:Society and Space, 2011, 29(4):693-715.
[37] Su X B. Tourism, modernity and the consumption of home in China. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2014, 39(1):50-61.
[38] Su X B, Cai X M, Liu M X. Prostitution, variegated homes, and the practice of unhomely life in China. Social&Cultural Geography, 2017:1-20.
[39] Feng Dan, Zhu Hong, Breitung W. Boundary and the making of home:A cultural study of the gated communities in Guangzhou, China. World Regional Studies, 2014, 23(3):64-73.[封丹,朱竑, Breitung W.门禁社区边界和家的构建关系研究.世界地理研究, 2014, 23(3):64-73.]
[40] Yin Duo, Qian Junxi, Zhu Hong. The representation and practice of new urban district-as-home in China:A case study of Kangbashi New Town, Ordos. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(12):1517-1528.[尹铎,钱俊希,朱竑.城市新区作为“家”的表征与实践:以鄂尔多斯康巴什新区为例.地理科学进展, 2016, 35(12):1517-1528.]
[41] Tao Wei, Jiangwei, He Xin. The morphological change of vernacular dwelling gate and conceptual representation of home:A case study of Pingyao. Geographical Research, 2014, 33(12):2418-2426.[陶伟,蒋伟,何新.平遥古城民居之门的形态变迁及其家的观念表征.地理研究, 2014, 33(12):2418-2426.]
[42] Xue Ximing, Feng Dan. Home and place in a changing world:A related review. Human Geography, 2016, 31(4):9-16.[薛熙明,封丹.变动中的家与地方:一个关联性的研究综述.人文地理, 2016, 31(4):9-16.]
[43] Su X B."It is my home. I will die here":Tourism development and the politics of place in Lijiang, China. Geografiska Annaler, 2012, 94(1):31-45.
[44] He Xuefeng. Three propositions on"Human Urbanization". Shanxi Agricultural Economy, 2015(1):7-8.[贺雪峰.关于“人的城市化”的三种主张.山西农经, 2015(1):7-8.]
[45] Creswell T. On the Move:Mobility in the Modern Western World. London:Routledge, 2006.
[46] Sun Jiuxia, Zhou Shangyi, Wang Ning, et al. Mobility in geographical research:Time, space and society. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(10):1801-1818.[孙九霞,周尚意,王宁,等.跨学科聚焦的新领域:流动的时间、空间与社会.地理研究, 2016, 35(10):1801-1818.]
[47] Blunt A, Dowling R. Home. London:Routledge, 2006.
[48] Massey D. A place called home. New Formations, 1992, 17(7):3-15.
[49] Xue Yali."Family out":The phenomenon of family migration from multidimensional perspective. China Population News, 2015-05-04(3).[薜亚利.“举家外出”:家庭式迁移现象多维透视.中国人口报, 2015-05-04(3).]
[50] Li Jingneng. Modern Western Population Theory. Shanghai:Fudan University Press, 2004.[李竟能.现代西方人口理论.上海:复旦大学出版社, 2004.]
[51] Xiong Jinwei, Zhong Zhangbao. Social rationality of migrant workers'family migration. China Rural Survey, 2016(4):40-55.[熊景维,钟涨宝.农民工家庭化迁移中的社会理性.中国农村观察, 2016(4):40-55.]
[52] Schmidt-Kallert E. A new paradigm of urban transition:Tracing the livelihood strategies of multi-locational households.Die Erde, 2009, 140(3):319-336.
[53] An Fansuo, Wu Hongyu. Study on the welfare of labor, adaptation of time and willingness to permanent migrant of workers, evidence from Guangdong survey. Social Sciences in Guangdong, 2014(3):22-29.[安凡所,吴红宇.劳动权益、时间适应与外来工永久迁移意愿研究:来自广东调查的证据.广东社会科学, 2014(3):22-29.]
[54] Tuan Yi-fu. Space and Place in the Perspective of Experience. Taipei:Taipei Institute for Compilation and Translation,1998.[段义孚.经验透视中的空间与地方.台北:台北编译馆, 1998.]
[55] Bate B. Understanding the influence tenure has on meanings of home and homemaking practices. Geography Compass,2018, 12(1):1-15.
[56] Brown J. Expressions of diasporic belonging:The divergent emotional geographies of Britain's Polish communities.Emotion, Space and Society, 2011, 4(4):229-237.
[57] Zhou Xiaohong. The influence of mobility and urban experience on modernity of peasants in China. An investigation of"Zhejiang Village"in Beijing and a rural community in Wenzhou. Sociological Studies, 1998(5):60-73.[周晓虹.流动与城市体验对中国农民现代性的影响:北京“浙江村”与温州一个农村社区的考察.社会学研究, 1998(5):60-73.]
[58] Tuan Y. Topophilia:A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes and Values. New York:Columbia University Press,1990.
[59] Sun Jiuxia. Tourism as a"social form":A"local"perspective. Tourism Tribune, 2017, 32(12):12-14.[孙九霞.作为一种“社会形式”的旅游:“地方”视角.旅游学刊, 2017, 32(12):12-14.]
[60] Jin Yihong. Mobile paternal authority:Change in migrant farmer families. Social Sciences in China, 2010(4):151-165.[金一虹.流动的父权:流动农民家庭的变迁.中国社会科学, 2010(4):151-165.]
[61] Kochan D. Home is where I lay down my hat? The complexities and functions of home for internal migrants in contemporary China. Geoforum, 2016, 71:21-32.