中国和“一带一路”沿线国家相对要素禀赋变化趋势研究
摘要
相比于绝大部分"一带一路"沿线国家,近年来我国科技、资本两大生产要素的相对要素禀赋优势明显上升,其中科技要素的比较优势上升幅度要显著高于资本要素,而在劳动力、土地、矿产资源等生产要素领域,我国则已转为相对要素禀赋劣势,且这一趋势在未来相当长一段时间内仍将持续。未来,我国在推进和"一带一路"沿线国家的合作中,应充分发挥和不同国家之间的各自比较优势,将建立技术推广型研发中心、资源深加工基地、劳动密集型环节生产基地、农产品生产基地作为投资合作的重点,并重点扩大技术密集型和资本密集型产品的出口,从而提升我国与"一带一路"沿线国家的经贸合作水平。
引文
[1]David I.Stern,The Role of Energy in Economic Growth,CCEP Working Paper 3.10,2010.
[2]Jeroen C.J.M.,Materials,capital,direct and indirect substitution,and Mass balance production functions,Land Economics,1999,Vol.75,No.4,pp:547—561.
[3]James Harrigan,Factor endowments and the international location of production:Econometric evidence for the OECD,1970—1985,Journal of International Economics,39(1995):123—141.
[4]Jan Fagerberg,Martin Srholec&Mark Gnell,The Competitiveness of Nations:Why some countries prosper while others fall behind,World Development,35(2007):123—141.
[5]Bernstein J.R.&Weinstein D.E.,Do endowments predict the location of production?Evidence from national and international data,Journal of International Economics,56(2002):55—76.
[6]Morrow P.M,Ricardian—Heckscher—Ohlin comparative advantage:Theory and evidence,Journal of International Economics,82(2010):137—151.
[7]Falvey R.&Gemmell N.,Factor endowments,nontradables prices and measures of‘openess’,Journal of Development Economics,58(1999):101—122.
[8]Antonio Spilimbergo,Juan Luis Londono&Miguel Szekely,Income distribution,factor endowments and trade openness,59(1999):77—101.
[9]Huiwen Lai&Susan Chun Zhu,Technology,endowments and the factor content of bilateral trade,Journal of International Economics,71(2007):387—409.
[10]Gustavsson P.,Hansson P.&Lundberg L.,Technology,resource endowments and international competitiveness,European Economic Review,43(1999):1501—1530.
[11]Deloitte,2014 Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index.
[12]Harold L Sirkin,Michael Zinser&Douglas Holner,Made in America again,The BCG Report.
[13]李超,覃成林.要素禀赋、资源环境约束与中国现代产业空间分布[J].南开经济研究,2011(4).
[14]鞠建东,林毅夫,王勇.要素禀赋、专业化分工、贸易的理论与实证——与杨小凯、张永生商榷[J].经济学(季刊),2004(10).
(1)注:由于部分年份巴基斯坦科技要素数据缺失,部分年份相对要素禀赋优势无法计算。
[2]Jeroen C.J.M.,Materials,capital,direct and indirect substitution,and Mass balance production functions,Land Economics,1999,Vol.75,No.4,pp:547—561.
[3]James Harrigan,Factor endowments and the international location of production:Econometric evidence for the OECD,1970—1985,Journal of International Economics,39(1995):123—141.
[4]Jan Fagerberg,Martin Srholec&Mark Gnell,The Competitiveness of Nations:Why some countries prosper while others fall behind,World Development,35(2007):123—141.
[5]Bernstein J.R.&Weinstein D.E.,Do endowments predict the location of production?Evidence from national and international data,Journal of International Economics,56(2002):55—76.
[6]Morrow P.M,Ricardian—Heckscher—Ohlin comparative advantage:Theory and evidence,Journal of International Economics,82(2010):137—151.
[7]Falvey R.&Gemmell N.,Factor endowments,nontradables prices and measures of‘openess’,Journal of Development Economics,58(1999):101—122.
[8]Antonio Spilimbergo,Juan Luis Londono&Miguel Szekely,Income distribution,factor endowments and trade openness,59(1999):77—101.
[9]Huiwen Lai&Susan Chun Zhu,Technology,endowments and the factor content of bilateral trade,Journal of International Economics,71(2007):387—409.
[10]Gustavsson P.,Hansson P.&Lundberg L.,Technology,resource endowments and international competitiveness,European Economic Review,43(1999):1501—1530.
[11]Deloitte,2014 Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index.
[12]Harold L Sirkin,Michael Zinser&Douglas Holner,Made in America again,The BCG Report.
[13]李超,覃成林.要素禀赋、资源环境约束与中国现代产业空间分布[J].南开经济研究,2011(4).
[14]鞠建东,林毅夫,王勇.要素禀赋、专业化分工、贸易的理论与实证——与杨小凯、张永生商榷[J].经济学(季刊),2004(10).
(1)注:由于部分年份巴基斯坦科技要素数据缺失,部分年份相对要素禀赋优势无法计算。