用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于库仑引力模型的中美日地缘经济关系测算
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Calculation of the geoeconomic relationships between China,the USA and Japan based on Coulomb force model
  • 作者:黄宇 ; 葛岳静 ; 刘晓凤
  • 英文作者:HUANG Yu;GE Yuejing;LIU Xiaofeng;Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University;
  • 关键词:地缘经济 ; 地缘经济合作强度 ; 竞争与合作 ; 库仑引力模型 ; 国际贸易 ; 贸易种类
  • 英文关键词:geoeconomy;;geoeconomic cooperative intensity;;competition and cooperation;;coulomb force model;;international trade;;trade categories
  • 中文刊名:DLXB
  • 英文刊名:Acta Geographica Sinica
  • 机构:北京师范大学地理科学学部;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-23 17:00
  • 出版单位:地理学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.74
  • 基金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(16ZDA041);; 国家自然科学基金项目(41871128)~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:DLXB201902007
  • 页数:12
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:11-1856/P
  • 分类号:87-98
摘要
冷战结束后,地缘经济成为影响国际关系的重要因素,国家间由于自然条件、资源禀赋、经济结构等不同形成了竞争型或合作型的地缘经济关系,在经济冲突加剧的地缘经济时代,如何平衡国家间的经济竞争与合作是当今国际关系的重要课题。本文以中美日三国2007-2016年为例,借鉴库仑引力的思想,引入地缘经济合作强度的概念和测度方法,探讨国家间地缘经济竞争与合作的规律,在考虑距离因素的基础上,分产品、进口和出口,准确地刻画了国家间经济合作或竞争的强弱程度。测算结果表明:(1)中美日三国的地缘经济合作强度多为负值,三国总体上竞争大于合作,且日本与其他两国的竞争相比于中美之间的竞争更加明显;(2)从贸易产品类型来看,三国间的矿物燃料、车辆、电机及设备零部件、机械设备等产品地缘经济合作强度的影响远大于其他产品类型,是决定三国间地缘经济关系的主要产品类型;(3)三国间石油类产品的地缘经济合作强度是所有产品中最小的,对海外石油资源的争夺是中美日三国地缘经济竞争关系中的决定性因素。
        Geoeconomics has become one of the most important factors of international relationship since the end of the Cold War. Different nations have formed competitive or cooperative geoeconomic relationships because of their different natural conditions, resource endowments, and economic structures. Hence, it is important to balance the economic competition and cooperation between nations in the geoeconomic era of heightened economic conflict. This paper aims to explore the rule of competitive or cooperative geoeconomic relationships between nations by taking China, the USA and Japan as examples, and the recent10 years(2007-2016) as a study period. As the major powers of the Pacific region, the geoeconomic relationships between China, the USA, and Japan have a strong connection with the development of the Pacific region and even the global economy. This paper builds the concept and measurement of geoeconomic cooperative intensity, inspired by the thought of the Coulomb force of physics. Compared with the previous measure, the method of geoeconomic cooperative intensity exactly portrays the degree of competitive or cooperative geoeconomic relationships between nations owing to its consideration of distance factor, production type factor, as well as the import and export volume. The results show that:(1) The geoeconomic relationship as a whole is more competitive than cooperative between China, the USA and Japan, while almost all the separate results are negative between the three nations. And Japan is more competitive with the other two nations than the competition between China and the USA;(2) In terms of the detailed products types, mineral fuels, vehicles, motors and equipment parts,and mechanical equipment generally determine the characteristics of the geoeconomic relationship among three nations, since these products have far greater influence on the geoeconomic relations than other products;(3) The cooperative intensity of oil resource between China, the USA and Japan is the smallest among all the products. In other words, the oil resource is the most influential product. Therefore, the competition of the overseas oil resource will be a decisive factor in the economic competition among China, the USA and Japan.
引文
[1] Yin Jiyuan, Li Shuling. Unfair trade wars under the WTO rules:Global anti-dumping case analysis and China strategic choices at the 20th anniversary of WTO. International Economics and Trade Research, 2015, 31(11):56-72.[尹继元,李淑玲. WTO规则下的不公平贸易战:WTO成立20周年之全球反倾销案件分析及中国的策略选择.国际经贸探索,2015, 31(11):56-72.]
    [2] An Husen, Zheng Wenguang. The connotation of the"Belt and Road Initiative"from the geopolitical perspective:Geoeconomy and the construction of a new international economic order. Social Sciences in Nanjing, 2016(4):5-14.[安虎森,郑文光.地缘政治视角下的“一带一路”战略内涵:地缘经济与建立全球经济新秩序.南京社会科学, 2016(4):5-14.]
    [3] Li Jidong, Peng Biyu, Wang Zhong, et al. China’s Geo-economic Strategies in 21st Century:A Study on the Economic Circle of South China. Beijing:China Economic Publishing House, 2001.[李继东,彭碧玉,王忠,等. 21世纪中国地缘经济战略:华南经济圈研究.北京:中国经济出版社, 2001.]
    [4] Lu Dadao, Du Debin. Some thoughts on the strengthening of geopolitical and geoeconomic studies. Acta Geographica Sinica,2013, 68(6):723-727.[陆大道,杜德斌.关于加强地缘政治地缘经济研究的思考.地理学报, 2013, 68(6):723-727.]
    [5] Cao Yunhua, Wen Feng. Building the security of China's geo-economy:inspecting China-ASEAN Free Trade Zone from the perspective of geo-economy. Around Southeast Asia, 2002(11):1-5.[曹云华,文峰.构筑中国的地缘经济安全:从地缘经济学的角度看中国—东盟自由贸易区.东南亚纵横, 2002(11):1-5.]
    [6] Inan S. Geoeconomic policies for regional development:Turkey as a catalyst for Eastern Europe. Ekonomika, 2005, 69:30-45.
    [7] Essex J. Development, security, and aid:Geopolitics and geoeconomics at the U.S. Agency for International Development. Georgia:University of Georgia Press, 2013:30-31.
    [8] Sparke M, Goldberg M, Levi M. Excavating the future in Cascadia:Geoeconomics and the imagined geographies of a cross-border region. Bc Studies:The British Columbian Quarterly, 2000(127):5-44.
    [9] Ni Shixiong, Qian Xuming. New geopolitics and the harmonious world. Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2008, 23(5):123-130, 160.[倪世雄,潜旭明.新地缘政治与和谐世界.清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2008, 23(5):123-130, 160.]
    [10] Luttwak E N. Turbo-Capitalism:Winners and Losers in the Global Economy. Beijing:Guangming Daily Press, 2000.[爱德华·卢特沃克.涡轮资本主义:全球经济中的赢家与输家.北京:光明日报出版社, 2000.]
    [11] Luttwak E N. From geopolitics to geo-economics:Logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. National Interest, 1990, 20(20):17-23.
    [12] Luttwak E N. The endangered American dream. Business Book Review Library, 1994, 11(1):1.
    [13] Ni Shixiong. Contemporary Theories of Western International Relations. Shanghai:Fudan University Press, 2001.[倪世雄.当代西方国际关系理论.上海:复旦大学出版社, 2001.]
    [14] Kennedy P. Chen Jingbiao, trans. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers:Economic Change and Military Conflict from1500-2000. Beijing:International Cultural Publishing Company, 1988.[保罗·肯尼迪.陈景彪,译.大国的兴衰.北京:国际文化出版公司, 1988.]
    [15] Cowen D, Smith N. After geopolitics? From the geopolitical social to geoeconomics. Antipode, 2009, 41(1):22-48.
    [16] Sheth J N,Sisodia R. Tectonic Shift:The Geoeconomic Realignment of Globalizing Markets. New Delhi:SAGE Publications Pvt. Ltd., 2006.
    [17] OLoughlin J, Anselin L. Geo-economic competition and trade bloc formation:United States, German, and Japanese exports, 1968-1992. Economic Geography, 1996, 72(2):131-160.
    [18] Sparke M. Not a State, but more than a state of mind:Cascading Cascadias and the geoeconomics of cross-border regionalism. Globalization, Regionalization and Cross-Border Regions. London:Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2002.
    [19] Sparke M. From geopolitics to geoeconomics:Transnational state effects in the borderlands. Geopolitics, 1998, 3(2):62-98.
    [20] Smith A. Imagining geographies of the'new Europe':Geo-economic power and the new European architecture of integration. Political Geography, 2002, 21(5):647-670.
    [21] Lee S. A geo-economic object or an object of geo-political absorption? Competing visions of North Korea in South Korean politics. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 2015, 45(4):693-714.
    [22] O'Hara S, Heffernan M. From geo-strategy to geo-economics:The'Heartland'and British imperialism before and after Mackinder. Geopolitics, 2006, 11(1):54-73.
    [23] Wong J. A China-centric economic order in East Asia. Asia Pacific Business Review, 2013, 19(2):286-296.
    [24] Mercille J, Jones A. Practicing radical geopolitics:Logics of power and the Iranian nuclear"crisis". Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2009, 99(5):856-862.
    [25] Agnew J, Corbridge S. The new geopolitics:The dynamics of geopolitical disorder//Johnston R, Taylor P. The World in"Crisis":Geographical Perspectives. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK:Basil Blackwell, 1989:266-288.
    [26] Zhang Xuebo, Wu Youde, Luo Huasong. Research on the theory and method for the measurement and analysis of interregional economic relationship:Take Yunnan Province as sample. Areal Research and Development, 2006, 25(4):34-39.[张学波,武友德,骆华松.地缘经济关系测度与分析的理论方法探讨:以云南省为例.地域研究与开发, 2006, 25(4):34-39.]
    [27] Su Donghui, Luo Huasong, Cai Dingkun. Analysis of geo-economic relationships between the region of Southeast Asia and major outside countries. World Regional Studies, 2013, 22(1):1-11.[苏东辉,骆华松,蔡定昆.区外大国与东南亚地缘经济关系测度分析.世界地理研究, 2013, 22(1):1-11.]
    [28] Xu Qian. Analysis of the match between the inter-provincial economic contact and geoeconomics relationship:Take Zhejiang for example. Economic Geography, 2010, 30(4):542-546.[徐茜.省际外联经济量与地缘经济关系的匹配分析:以浙江省为例.经济地理, 2010, 30(4):542-546.]
    [29] Sun Haiyan, Liu Xianzhao, Yang Lingling. Analysis on the inter-regional economic relationship between Shandong and Tianjin Binhai new area. Economic Geography, 2009, 29(12):1972-1976.[孙海燕,刘贤赵,杨玲玲.山东省与天津滨海新区地缘经济关系分析.经济地理, 2009, 29(12):1972-1976.]
    [30] Zhao Minghua, Li Jiaojiao, Han Rongqing, et al. The geo-economic relationship among the Bohai Rim in provincial scale. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(11):29-35.[赵明华,李娇娇,韩荣青,等.环渤海地区省际地缘经济关系研究.经济地理, 2015, 35(11):29-35.]
    [31] Deng Chunyu. A matching analysis on the foreign economic contact and geo-economic relationship of the economic circle PRD. Progress in Geography, 2010, 29(2):208-216.[邓春玉.珠三角经济圈对外经济联系与地缘经济关系匹配分析.地理科学进展, 2010, 29(2):208-216.]
    [32] Liu Shaopai, Tian Jipeng, Lu Lin. A case study of Shanghai Disneyland on spatial structure forecast for proposed scenic spot market:Modification and its application of gravity model. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(2):304-321.[刘少湃,田纪鹏,陆林.上海迪士尼在建景区客源市场空间结构预测:旅游引力模型的修正及应用.地理学报, 2016, 71(2):304-321.]
    [33] Yang Wenlong, Du Debin, Liu Chengliang, et al. Study on the spatial-temporal evolution and internal mechanism of geoeconomic connections of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(6):956-969.[杨文龙,杜德斌,刘承良,等.中国地缘经济联系的时空演化特征及其内部机制.地理学报, 2016, 71(6):956-969.]
    [34] Deng Xinghua, Cui Fan, Lin Zhouyu. Evolution of global trade structure and trade growth:An empirical analysis based on gravity model. Journal of International Trade, 2015(7):25-34.[邓兴华,崔凡,林洲钰.全球贸易结构演化与贸易增长:基于引力模型的实证分析.国际贸易问题, 2015(7):25-34.]
    [35] International Trade Centre. ITC Trade Statistics for International Business Development. http://www.intracen.org/leatherline-portal/market-trends/trade-statistics/.2019-01-04.
    [36] Leng Tao. A long-lasting trade war:Comments on the trade friction between America and Japan. Journal of International Trade, 1997(3):22-25.[冷滔.一场旷日持久的贸易战:试评美日贸易摩擦.国际贸易问题, 1997(3):22-25.]
    [37] Wang Li. The recall by Toyota Motor Corporation and a new phase of trade war between the US and Japan. Asia&Africa Review, 2010(3):5-10, 59.[王力.丰田“召回门”与美日贸易战新阶段.亚非纵横, 2010(3):5-10, 59.]
    [38] Chen Yongfu, He Xiurong. An internecine ending:Analysis on the vegetable trade friction between China and Japan.Intertrade, 2001(5):15-17.[陈永福,何秀荣.两伤结局:中日蔬菜贸易战解析.国际贸易, 2001(5):15-17.]
    [39] Wang Lei. Analysis on the trade war between China and America. Chinese Statistics, 2010(2):41.[王蕾.浅析中美贸易战.中国统计, 2010(2):41.]
    [40] Chen Zhiheng, Gan Ruimiao. Complementarity of the trade between China, Japan and Korea and the construction of CJKFTA. Zhejiang Academic Journal, 2017(1):200-207.[陈志恒,甘睿淼.中日韩贸易互补性与构建“三国自贸区”.浙江学刊, 2017(1):200-207.]
    [41] Liu Dongxu. Possible ways to realize the Asia-Pacific FTA:Based on complementary and competitive trade of economies in the Asia-Pacific region. World Economy Studies, 2016(6):122-133, 136.[刘东旭.亚太自由贸易区实现路径选择:基于亚太地区各经济体的贸易互补性和竞争性分析.世界经济研究, 2016(6):122-133, 136.]
    [42] Cosco Container Lines Co. Ltd. http://lines.coscoshipping.com/home, 2017-12-25.[中远海运集装箱运输有限公司.http://lines.coscoshipping.com/home, 2017-12-25.]
    [43] British Petrol. BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2017. London:Pureprint Group, 2017.
    [44] Fischer M M, Wang J. Spatial Data Analysis:Models, Methods and Techniques. Heidelberg:Springer, 2011.
    [45] Li Hong, Wei Yonggui, Xu Quanlong. Progress in geo-economic cooperation research from China's perspective:A case study of the cooperation between China and ASEAN. Tropical Geography, 2015, 35(5):719-729.[李红,韦永贵,徐全龙.基于中国视角的地缘经济合作研究进展:以中国―东盟合作研究为例.热带地理, 2015, 35(5):719-729.]

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700