政治效能感、社会资本对农地整治农户参与意愿的影响研究
|
摘要
研究目的:分析政治效能感、社会资本对农地整治农户参与意愿的影响。研究方法:因子分析、回归分析、中介效应分析。研究结果:(1)农户参与整治的意愿并不强烈,其政治效能感有较大提升空间,社会资本存量有限;(2)政治效能感、社会资本两类因素共同影响农户参与意愿,其中,外在政治效能感、信任、规范具有显著正向影响,网络具有显著负向影响,内在政治效能感影响不显著;(3)政治效能感在社会资本对参与意愿的影响中总体起中介作用,在网络与参与意愿间起遮掩作用。研究结论:应强化农户主体意识,健全诉求表达与反馈机制,积累农村社会资本,重视政治效能感与社会资本的叠加效应,并充分发挥政治效能感中介作用,夯实乡村治理的群众基础。
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effects of political efficacy and social capital on farmers' participation willingness to rural land consolidation. The methods of factor analysis, regression analysis and mediating effect analysis are employed. The results are as follows: 1)farmers' participation willingness is not strong, while farmers' political efficacy and social capital are limited; 2)political efficacy factors and social capital factors mutually affect the farmers' participation willingness significantly; external political efficacy, social trust and social norms have significant positive effects; social network has significant negative effects, and the effects of internal political efficacy is not significant; 3)political efficacy works as a mediating effect between social capital and participation willingness but a masking effect between social network and participation willingness. In conclusion, the government should strengthen farmers' subjective consciousness, establish the mechanism for farmers' demand expression and feedback, improve the existing rural social capital, pay attention to the superimposition effect of political efficacy and social capital, and stimulate the mediating effect of political efficacy to increase farmers' participation willingness, and to reinforce the mass basis of rural governance.
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effects of political efficacy and social capital on farmers' participation willingness to rural land consolidation. The methods of factor analysis, regression analysis and mediating effect analysis are employed. The results are as follows: 1)farmers' participation willingness is not strong, while farmers' political efficacy and social capital are limited; 2)political efficacy factors and social capital factors mutually affect the farmers' participation willingness significantly; external political efficacy, social trust and social norms have significant positive effects; social network has significant negative effects, and the effects of internal political efficacy is not significant; 3)political efficacy works as a mediating effect between social capital and participation willingness but a masking effect between social network and participation willingness. In conclusion, the government should strengthen farmers' subjective consciousness, establish the mechanism for farmers' demand expression and feedback, improve the existing rural social capital, pay attention to the superimposition effect of political efficacy and social capital, and stimulate the mediating effect of political efficacy to increase farmers' participation willingness, and to reinforce the mass basis of rural governance.
引文
[1]田甜,杨钢桥,赵微,等.农地整治项目农民参与行为机理研究——基于嵌入性社会结构理论[J].农业技术经济,2015(7):16-26.
[2]徐雯.农地整治项目治理的内涵及分析框架[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(4):280-283.
[3]吴九兴,杨钢桥.农地整理项目农民参与行为的机理研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(2):102-110.
[4]杨昭熙,杨钢桥,汪文雄,等.社会资本视域下农民参与农地整治项目的行为机理[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(3):288-294.
[5]李祎琛,吴诗嫚.农地整治项目规划设计阶段农户参与度影响因素研究——基于博弈论视角[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(4):69-74.
[6]赵微.基于制度构成理论的农地整理建后管护的农民愿意研究[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(9):89-96.
[7]赵微,周惠,杨钢桥,等.农民参与农地整理项目建后管护的意愿与行为转化研究:以河南邓州的调查为例[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(3):55-62.
[8]杨钢桥,龚晓晨,吴九兴,等.基于感知价值的农民参与农地整理项目意愿影响因素研究[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014,33(4):105-111.
[9]石瑛,董丁戈.论基于政治效能感的公民政治参与[J].学术交流,2012(9):17-20.
[10]石晶.中国公众的政治参与观念调查报告(2016)[J].国家治理,2016(23):25-39.
[11]裴志军.制度刚性下的村民自治参与:社会资本与政治效能感的作用[J].农业经济问题,2013(5):33-43.
[12]裴志军.政治效能感、社会网络与公共协商参与——来自浙江农村的实证研究[J].社会科学战线,2015(11):195-205.
[13]裴志军.自我效能感、政治信任与村民选举参与:一个自治参与的心理机制[J].农业技术经济,2014(7):49-58.
[14]赵雪雁.社会资本测量研究综述[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(7):127-133.
[15]石峡,朱道林,张军连.土地整治公众参与机制中的社会资本及其作用[J].中国土地科学,2014,28(4):84-90.
[16]夏瑞卿,杨忠.社会认知视角的知识共享行为研究[J].情报杂志,2013(11):196-201.
[17]顾远东,彭纪生.技术创新效能感对技术创新绩效的影响——基于社会认知理论的分析[J].中国科技论坛,2011(2):21-26.
[18]汪曲,李燕萍.团队内关系格局能影响员工沉默行为吗:基于社会认知理论的解释框架[J].管理工程学报,2017,3(14):34-44.
[19]刘同山,牛立腾.农户分化、土地退出意愿与农民的选择偏好[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(6):114-120.
[20]温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展,2014,2(25):731-745.
[21]刘红云,骆方,张玉,等.因变量为等级变量的中介效应分析[J].心理学报,2013,4(512):1431-1442.
[2]徐雯.农地整治项目治理的内涵及分析框架[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(4):280-283.
[3]吴九兴,杨钢桥.农地整理项目农民参与行为的机理研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(2):102-110.
[4]杨昭熙,杨钢桥,汪文雄,等.社会资本视域下农民参与农地整治项目的行为机理[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(3):288-294.
[5]李祎琛,吴诗嫚.农地整治项目规划设计阶段农户参与度影响因素研究——基于博弈论视角[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(4):69-74.
[6]赵微.基于制度构成理论的农地整理建后管护的农民愿意研究[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(9):89-96.
[7]赵微,周惠,杨钢桥,等.农民参与农地整理项目建后管护的意愿与行为转化研究:以河南邓州的调查为例[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(3):55-62.
[8]杨钢桥,龚晓晨,吴九兴,等.基于感知价值的农民参与农地整理项目意愿影响因素研究[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014,33(4):105-111.
[9]石瑛,董丁戈.论基于政治效能感的公民政治参与[J].学术交流,2012(9):17-20.
[10]石晶.中国公众的政治参与观念调查报告(2016)[J].国家治理,2016(23):25-39.
[11]裴志军.制度刚性下的村民自治参与:社会资本与政治效能感的作用[J].农业经济问题,2013(5):33-43.
[12]裴志军.政治效能感、社会网络与公共协商参与——来自浙江农村的实证研究[J].社会科学战线,2015(11):195-205.
[13]裴志军.自我效能感、政治信任与村民选举参与:一个自治参与的心理机制[J].农业技术经济,2014(7):49-58.
[14]赵雪雁.社会资本测量研究综述[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(7):127-133.
[15]石峡,朱道林,张军连.土地整治公众参与机制中的社会资本及其作用[J].中国土地科学,2014,28(4):84-90.
[16]夏瑞卿,杨忠.社会认知视角的知识共享行为研究[J].情报杂志,2013(11):196-201.
[17]顾远东,彭纪生.技术创新效能感对技术创新绩效的影响——基于社会认知理论的分析[J].中国科技论坛,2011(2):21-26.
[18]汪曲,李燕萍.团队内关系格局能影响员工沉默行为吗:基于社会认知理论的解释框架[J].管理工程学报,2017,3(14):34-44.
[19]刘同山,牛立腾.农户分化、土地退出意愿与农民的选择偏好[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(6):114-120.
[20]温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展,2014,2(25):731-745.
[21]刘红云,骆方,张玉,等.因变量为等级变量的中介效应分析[J].心理学报,2013,4(512):1431-1442.