大麦种质对叶斑病的抗性鉴定与评价
|
摘要
由麦根腐平脐蠕胞菌[Bipolaris sorokiniana(Sacc.) Shoemaker]引起的叶斑病在世界各大麦种植区均有发生,严重影响大麦的产量和品质。选育和应用抗性品种是防控该病害最有效的策略,然而可利用的抗源非常有限。在本研究中对中国233份具有代表性的大麦种质资源进行成株期抗叶斑病田间人工接种鉴定,发现只有垦啤麦5号等10份材料对3个供试菌株都表现抗病,仅占供试材料的4.3%。另外对37份国内外重要的叶斑病抗源材料进行苗期及成株期抗叶斑病鉴定,结果显示成株期抗叶斑病材料所占比例为41%～46%,苗期抗性材料所占比例为50%～64%,其中ND17293等11份材料在苗期和成株期对3个菌株均表现为抗病,可作为抗源继续加以利用;基于上述鉴定结果,进一步分析发现供试大麦苗期对三个菌株的抗病比例均高于成株期抗病比例,说明大麦在不同生育期对叶斑病的抗性存在较大差异。另外发现大麦对B. sorokiniana不同致病类型的抗性也存在明显的专化性。
Barley spot blotch,initiated by the fungal pathogen [Bipolaris sorokiniana( Sacc.) Shoemaker],happened frequently in most barley-grown areas in the world,and caused serious barley yield losses and also decreased grain quality. Development and wider application of resistant barley cultivars was the most effective control strategy for spot blotch. However,few barley resistance genes or genotypes to spot blotch were available in breeding programs. In this study,233 representive barley germplasm accessions originating from China were screened for spot blotch resistance by artificial inoculation in adult-plant stage. Only 10 accessions among them such as Kenpimai 5 showed high resistance to all three isolates used,accounting for 4.3%. Another 37 spot blotch resistance barley lines from domestic and foreign were also evaluated for resistance levels to B.sorokiniana isolates in adult-plant and seedling stages respectively. The results showed that 41%-46% of the 37 accessions were resistant to spot blotch in adult-plant stage,but in seedling stage the resistance percentage ranged from 50%to 64%.Eleven barley lines such as ND 17293 were resistant to all three isolates used both in adult-plant and seedling stages. These resistance lines can be still utilized as resistance sources. Based on the spot blotch resistance identification results with 3 isolates,resistance percentage of the barley accessions in seedling stage was usually higher than in adult-plant stage,indicating that there is great difference between barley seeding and adult-plant resistance to spot blotch. In addition,barley accessions showed resistance specificity to pathotypes of B. sorokiniana.
Barley spot blotch,initiated by the fungal pathogen [Bipolaris sorokiniana( Sacc.) Shoemaker],happened frequently in most barley-grown areas in the world,and caused serious barley yield losses and also decreased grain quality. Development and wider application of resistant barley cultivars was the most effective control strategy for spot blotch. However,few barley resistance genes or genotypes to spot blotch were available in breeding programs. In this study,233 representive barley germplasm accessions originating from China were screened for spot blotch resistance by artificial inoculation in adult-plant stage. Only 10 accessions among them such as Kenpimai 5 showed high resistance to all three isolates used,accounting for 4.3%. Another 37 spot blotch resistance barley lines from domestic and foreign were also evaluated for resistance levels to B.sorokiniana isolates in adult-plant and seedling stages respectively. The results showed that 41%-46% of the 37 accessions were resistant to spot blotch in adult-plant stage,but in seedling stage the resistance percentage ranged from 50%to 64%.Eleven barley lines such as ND 17293 were resistant to all three isolates used both in adult-plant and seedling stages. These resistance lines can be still utilized as resistance sources. Based on the spot blotch resistance identification results with 3 isolates,resistance percentage of the barley accessions in seedling stage was usually higher than in adult-plant stage,indicating that there is great difference between barley seeding and adult-plant resistance to spot blotch. In addition,barley accessions showed resistance specificity to pathotypes of B. sorokiniana.
引文
[1]Guo H Q.Establishment of a set differential hosts and virulence analysis of Bipolaris sorokiniana(in Chinese)[D].Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences(北京:中国农业科学院),2016.
[2]Meldrum S I,Ogle H J,Platz G J.Pathotypes of Cochliobolus sativus on barley in Australia[J].Plant Pathology,2004,33(1):109-114.
[3]Iftikhar S,Asad S,Rattu A U,et al.Selection of barley germplasm resistant to spot blotch[J].Pakistan Journal of Botany,2009,41(1):309-314.
[4]Singh T,Mishra V K,Prasad L C,et al.Genetic evaluation of barley(Hordeum vulgare L.)germplasm for resistance components of spot blotch disease[J].Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding,2014,5(2):158-164.
[5]Fetch T G,Steffenson B J.Identification of Cochliobolus sativus isolates expressing differential virulence on two-row barley genotypes from North Dakota[J].Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology,1994,16(3):202-206.
[6]Gyawali S.Association mapping of resistance to common root rot and spot blotch in barley,and population genetics of Cochliobolus sativus[D].Fargo:North Dakota State University,2010.
[7]Dai F,Nevo E,Wu D,Comadran J,et al.Tibet is one of the center of domestication of cultivated barley[J].PNAS,2012,109(42):16969-16973.
[8]Limpert E,Müller K.Designation of pathotypes of plant pathogens[J].Phytopathology,1994,140(4):346-358.
[9]Fetch T G,Steffenson B J.Rating scales for assessing infection responses of barley infected with Cochliobolus sativus[J].Plant Disease,1999,83(3):213-217.
[10]Prasad R,Prasada L C,Chandb R,et al.Assessment of diversity for resistance to spot blotch disease and its association with certain phenotypic traits in barely[J].Field Crops Research,2013,154(3):195-200.
[11]Li L F,Zhou Y F,Wei S H.Study on the identification of barley varieties to root rot(in Chinese)[J].Barley and Cereal Sciences(大麦与谷类科学),1992(4):28-29.
[12]LüE S,Zhang F Y,Lin R M,et al.Identification of the resistance of barley varieties to root rot in seedling stage(in Chinese)[J].Barley and Cereal Sciences(大麦与谷类科学),2015(3):30-34.
[13]Ghazvini H,Tekauz A.Virulence diversity in the population of Bipolaris sorokiniana[J].Plant Disease,2007,91(7):814-821.
[14]Sha A H.Study on mechanism of adult plant resistance to bacterial blight(in Chinese)[D].Wuhan:Huazhong Agricultural University(武汉:华中农业大学),2004.
[15]Ibeagha A,Hückelhoven R,Kogel K.Model wheat genotypes as tools to uncover effective defense mechanisms against the hemibiotrophic fungus Bipolaris sorokiniana[J].Phytopathology,2005,95(5):528-532.
[16]Schfer P,Hückelhoven R,Kogel K H.The white barley mutant albostrians shows a supersusceptible but symptomless interaction phenotype with the hemibiotrophic fungus Bipolaris sorokiniana[J].Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions,2004,17(4):366-373.
[17]Valjavec-Gratian M,Steffenson B J.Genetics of virulence in Cochliobolus sativus and resistance in barley[J].Phytopathology,1997,87(11):1140-1143.
[18]Kumar J,Hückelhoven R,Beckhove U,et al.A compromised Mlo pathway affects the response of barley to the necrotrophic fungus Bipolaris sorokiniana(teleomorph:Cochliobolus sativus)[J].Phytopathology,2001,91(2):127-133.
[2]Meldrum S I,Ogle H J,Platz G J.Pathotypes of Cochliobolus sativus on barley in Australia[J].Plant Pathology,2004,33(1):109-114.
[3]Iftikhar S,Asad S,Rattu A U,et al.Selection of barley germplasm resistant to spot blotch[J].Pakistan Journal of Botany,2009,41(1):309-314.
[4]Singh T,Mishra V K,Prasad L C,et al.Genetic evaluation of barley(Hordeum vulgare L.)germplasm for resistance components of spot blotch disease[J].Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding,2014,5(2):158-164.
[5]Fetch T G,Steffenson B J.Identification of Cochliobolus sativus isolates expressing differential virulence on two-row barley genotypes from North Dakota[J].Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology,1994,16(3):202-206.
[6]Gyawali S.Association mapping of resistance to common root rot and spot blotch in barley,and population genetics of Cochliobolus sativus[D].Fargo:North Dakota State University,2010.
[7]Dai F,Nevo E,Wu D,Comadran J,et al.Tibet is one of the center of domestication of cultivated barley[J].PNAS,2012,109(42):16969-16973.
[8]Limpert E,Müller K.Designation of pathotypes of plant pathogens[J].Phytopathology,1994,140(4):346-358.
[9]Fetch T G,Steffenson B J.Rating scales for assessing infection responses of barley infected with Cochliobolus sativus[J].Plant Disease,1999,83(3):213-217.
[10]Prasad R,Prasada L C,Chandb R,et al.Assessment of diversity for resistance to spot blotch disease and its association with certain phenotypic traits in barely[J].Field Crops Research,2013,154(3):195-200.
[11]Li L F,Zhou Y F,Wei S H.Study on the identification of barley varieties to root rot(in Chinese)[J].Barley and Cereal Sciences(大麦与谷类科学),1992(4):28-29.
[12]LüE S,Zhang F Y,Lin R M,et al.Identification of the resistance of barley varieties to root rot in seedling stage(in Chinese)[J].Barley and Cereal Sciences(大麦与谷类科学),2015(3):30-34.
[13]Ghazvini H,Tekauz A.Virulence diversity in the population of Bipolaris sorokiniana[J].Plant Disease,2007,91(7):814-821.
[14]Sha A H.Study on mechanism of adult plant resistance to bacterial blight(in Chinese)[D].Wuhan:Huazhong Agricultural University(武汉:华中农业大学),2004.
[15]Ibeagha A,Hückelhoven R,Kogel K.Model wheat genotypes as tools to uncover effective defense mechanisms against the hemibiotrophic fungus Bipolaris sorokiniana[J].Phytopathology,2005,95(5):528-532.
[16]Schfer P,Hückelhoven R,Kogel K H.The white barley mutant albostrians shows a supersusceptible but symptomless interaction phenotype with the hemibiotrophic fungus Bipolaris sorokiniana[J].Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions,2004,17(4):366-373.
[17]Valjavec-Gratian M,Steffenson B J.Genetics of virulence in Cochliobolus sativus and resistance in barley[J].Phytopathology,1997,87(11):1140-1143.
[18]Kumar J,Hückelhoven R,Beckhove U,et al.A compromised Mlo pathway affects the response of barley to the necrotrophic fungus Bipolaris sorokiniana(teleomorph:Cochliobolus sativus)[J].Phytopathology,2001,91(2):127-133.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |