行政公益诉讼制度的沿革、特点与反思
|
摘要
国有土地使用权出让、生态环境和资源保护、食品药品安全、国有财产保护等各个方面的问题关系到广大人民群众最根本的利益。行政公益诉讼制度从试点到进一步完善,业已成为保护公共利益的重要手段,同时也形成了起诉主体的单一,诉前程序、诉讼程序相结合,通过间接手段维护公共利益,受案范围存在争议等特点。对正处在改革的攻坚阶段和发展的关键期的当代中国,如何反思行政公益诉讼制度、完善行政公益诉讼制度显得尤为关键。
The transfer of the right to use state-owned land, the protection of ecological environment and resources, the safety of food and drugs, the protection of state-owned property and so on are related to the most fundamental interests of the broad masses of the people. The administrative public interest litigation system has become an important means to protect the public interest from the pilot to further improvement. At the same time, it has also formed the single subject of prosecution, the combination of the pre-litigation procedure and the litigation procedure, and the protection of the public interest through indirect means. The scope of the case is controversial and so on. How to reflect on the administrative public interest litigation system and perfect the administrative public interest litigation system is especially crucial to contemporary China, which is in the critical stage of reform and development.
The transfer of the right to use state-owned land, the protection of ecological environment and resources, the safety of food and drugs, the protection of state-owned property and so on are related to the most fundamental interests of the broad masses of the people. The administrative public interest litigation system has become an important means to protect the public interest from the pilot to further improvement. At the same time, it has also formed the single subject of prosecution, the combination of the pre-litigation procedure and the litigation procedure, and the protection of the public interest through indirect means. The scope of the case is controversial and so on. How to reflect on the administrative public interest litigation system and perfect the administrative public interest litigation system is especially crucial to contemporary China, which is in the critical stage of reform and development.
引文
(1)周相:《罗马法原论》,商务印书馆,1994年版,第886页。
(2)郑智、杨彰立:《检察院诉环保局:全国首例行政公益诉讼》,《检察日报》,2015年11月26日。
(3)周斌:《六位省级检长解读最高检工作报告》,《法制日报》,2018年3月10日。http://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/zdgz/201803/t20180310_370016.shtml.
(4)周斌:《六位省级检长解读最高检工作报告》,《法制日报》,2018年3月10日。http://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/zdgz/201803/t20180310_370016.shtm.l
(5)王名扬:《美国行政法下》,中国法制出版社,1995年1月,第602页。
(6)姜涛:《检察机关提起行政公益诉讼制度:一个中国问题的思考》,《政法论坛》,2015年第6期。
(7)马怀德:《行政公益诉讼制度,从理论走向现实》,《检察日报》,2015年7月3日第003版。
(8)刘子阳:《稳步推进试点325起案件启动诉前程序——全国检察院已提起公益诉讼15件》,《法制日报》2016年4月14日,第3版。
(9)秦前红:《检察机关参与行政公益诉讼理论与实践若干问题的讨论》,《政治与法律》2016年第11期,第83页。
(2)郑智、杨彰立:《检察院诉环保局:全国首例行政公益诉讼》,《检察日报》,2015年11月26日。
(3)周斌:《六位省级检长解读最高检工作报告》,《法制日报》,2018年3月10日。http://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/zdgz/201803/t20180310_370016.shtml.
(4)周斌:《六位省级检长解读最高检工作报告》,《法制日报》,2018年3月10日。http://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/zdgz/201803/t20180310_370016.shtm.l
(5)王名扬:《美国行政法下》,中国法制出版社,1995年1月,第602页。
(6)姜涛:《检察机关提起行政公益诉讼制度:一个中国问题的思考》,《政法论坛》,2015年第6期。
(7)马怀德:《行政公益诉讼制度,从理论走向现实》,《检察日报》,2015年7月3日第003版。
(8)刘子阳:《稳步推进试点325起案件启动诉前程序——全国检察院已提起公益诉讼15件》,《法制日报》2016年4月14日,第3版。
(9)秦前红:《检察机关参与行政公益诉讼理论与实践若干问题的讨论》,《政治与法律》2016年第11期,第83页。