面向新一代ICT产业竞争的标准必要专利战略启示及应对

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Research on the Standard Essential Patents Strategies Towards the New Generation of ICT Industrial Competition and China's Countermeasures 作者：詹爱岚 ; 王洁怡 英文作者：Zhan Ailan;Wang Jieyi;China Institute for SME, Zhejiang University of Technology;Law School, Zhejiang University of Technology;Zhejiang Provincial New Key Professional Think Tank; 关键词：标准必要专利 ; ICT ; FRAND ; 禁止令 英文关键词：standard essential patent;;ICT;;FRAND;;injunction 中文刊名：QBZZ 英文刊名：Journal of Intelligence 机构：浙江工业大学中国中小企业研究院;浙江工业大学法学院;浙江省新型重点专业智库; 出版日期：2019-05-18 出版单位：情报杂志 年：2019 期：v.38 基金：教育部社会科学规划基金项目“基于专利合作竞争网络的企业专利战略决策机制研究”(编号:15YJA630096);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关项目“我国民营中小企业参与一带一路国际产能合作战略研究”(编号:17JZD018);; 浙江省软科学项目“浙江标准引领下中小企业的战略选择及实施路径研究”(编号:2018C35030) 语种：中文; 页：QBZZ201905005 页数：7 CN：05 ISSN：61-1167/G3 分类号：33-39

摘要

[目的/意义]新一代ICT及其标准化作为产业跨界融合的经济增长"引擎",成为了新一轮产业革命的主线,更是世界各国争相抢占的战略"高地"。随着5G、物联网等呼之欲出的大规模应用,巨大的市场体量必将催生新一轮标准必要专利大战。[方法/过程]在分析近年国际上出现的与标准必要专利相关的司法实践新规则、新战略,以及部分国家和地区针对标准必要专利许可实践所做的战略安排与政策指引的基础上,结合我国标准必要专利存量及诉讼现状,分别从国家、产业和企业三个层面提出战略应对。[结果/结论]从战略上来看,欧盟成为了"谈判、诉讼、禁令"三位一体的标准必要专利战略模式实施的主战场、禁诉令成为跨国平行诉讼的新型战略工具、急需面向新一代ICT的产业标准必要专利许可实践引导。由此,企业应做好标准必要专利诉讼的风险识别、应对和管理;产业应加强企业标准必要专利许可实践的引导服务;国家应构建禁令制度体系。
        [Purpose/Significance]The new generation of ICT and its standardization, as the "engine" of the economic growth for industrial convergence, have become the backbone of the fourth industrial revolution and the strategic "highland" that all of the industrial countries are vying for. With the coming large-scale applications of 5G and the Internet of things, the huge market volume is bound to bring a new wave of standard essential patent wars.[Method/Process]Based on the analysis of the standard essential patents' new rules and strategies in the judicial practice from a global level, and the investigation of the strategical policy guides in EU and Japan, it gives some suggestions from three perspectives, taking Chinese companies' essential patent holding and related litigation into consideration.[Result/Conclusion]From the strategic point of view, EU has become the promised battlefield for a trinity pattern of standard essential patents strategy, anti-suit injunction has been strategically used in those parallel international litigation, and it is necessary for the Chinese government and industrial service organizations to strengthen the negotiation guides for the standard essential patents licensing. Accordingly, local companies should strive to identify, respond and manage the risk of the standard essential patent lawsuits.

引文

[1] 单晓光.中美贸易战中的知识产权问题分析[J].学术前沿,2018(17):18-26.
    [2] 赵启彬.论标准必要专利侵权案件停止侵权抗辩规则的构建——并论德国标准必要专利停止侵权抗辩规则之新发展[J].中国专利与商标,2017(2):66-82.
    [3] 仲春.专利国际诉讼中反禁令的司法应对[J].知识产权,2018(4):88-96.
    [4] 李梅,毕春丽,李文宇.专利私掠型NPE施压实体企业[N].中国技术市场报,2018-09-18(003).
    [5] NPE litigation in the european union:Facts and figures[R].Darts-IP Reports,[2018-12-15].https://www.darts- ip.com/npe-litigation-in-the-european-union-facts-and-figures-2/.
    [6] Contreras,Jorge L,Eixenberger,Michael.The anti-suit injunction - A transnational remedy for multi-jurisdictional SEP litigation[M].Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law:Patent,Antitrust and Competition Law,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2017:451-460.
    [7] 倪朱亮,申楠,胡毅.标准必要专利实施许可条件的裁判思路研[J].知识产权,2016(12):26-31.