学习进程中元认知监测动态变化的研究

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Research on Dynamic Changes of Metacognitive Monitoring in Learning Process 作者：倪虹霞 ; 王旭 英文作者：Ni Hongxia;Wang Xu; 关键词：元认知监测 ; 前瞻性监测 ; 回溯性监测 英文关键词：metacognitive monitoring;;prospective monitoring;;retrospective monitoring 中文刊名：KJXH 英文刊名：The Science Education Article Collects 机构：贵州师范大学教育科学学院;贵州航空职业技术学院; 出版日期：2019-02-28 出版单位：科教文汇(下旬刊) 年：2019 期：No.450 语种：中文; 页：KJXH201902069 页数：4 CN：02 ISSN：34-1274/G 分类号：171-173+194

摘要

要求学习者在不同的学习阶段对自己的学习结果做出预测性评估,探讨不同类型元认知判断对人们元认知监测准确性的影响。60名大学生参加了实验。研究结果表明:随着学习的深入,元认知监测的准确性逐渐得到提高,后一阶段元认知监测的准确性显著高于前一阶段的监测准确性。本研究的结果验证了回溯性元认知监测较前瞻性元认知监测更为准确这一观点。
        Learners are required to make a predictive assessment of their learning outcomes at different stages of learning, and explore the impact of different types of metacognitive judgments on the accuracy of people's metacognitive monitoring. 60 college students participated in the experiment. The results show that with the deepening of learning, the accuracy of metacognitive monitoring is gradually improved, and the accuracy of metacognitive monitoring in the latter stage is significantly higher than that in the previous stage. The results of this study validate the notion that retrospective metacognitive monitoring is more accurate than prospective metacognitive monitoring.

引文

[1] Chua,E.F.&Solinger,L.A.Building metamemorial knowledge over time:insights from eye tracking about the bases of feeling-of-knowing and confidence judgments[J].Front Psychol,2015,6:1206.
    [2] Mueller,M.L.&Dunlosky,J.How beliefs can impact judgments of learning:Evaluating analytic processing theory with beliefs about fluency[J].Journal of Memory and Language,2017,93:245-258.
    [3] Robey,A.M.,Dougherty,M.R.,&Buttaccio,D.R.Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners'Ability to Decide What Not to Study[J].Psychological Science,2017,28(11):1683-1693.