YC-EM'_C指数:时间与合作视角下的作者影响力评价研究
|
摘要
[目的/意义]从H指数的提出开始,对科研人员的评估指标研究一直是热点话题。介绍由Bihari学者基于EM指数、YC-H指数提出的YC-EM'指数。[方法/过程]从合作维度改进YC-EM'指数并命名为YC-EM'_C指数。以国外计量学领域54位科学家10年文献数据为实验对象,从作者区分度、作者排名情况,以及与各参数的相关性角度验证YC-EM'_C指数有效性。[结果/结论]YC-EM'_C指数区分性高;作者名次变化明显;与论文数量、署名顺序等具有不同相关性,YC-EM'_C指数的评价结果更符合实际。
[Purpose/Significance]This article introduces a newindex,YC-EM' index,for more exact evaluating of authors influence.[Method/Process]This paper takes cooperation into consideration and names YC-EM'_Cindex based on EMindex and Year-Based H-indices. An empirical study has been made on 54 scientists' publication data,who are working in scientometrics and bibliometrics fields. The author discriminations,rankings,and correlations of YC-EM'_C index with other parameters are discussed in detailed.[Result/Conclusion]The research shows that YC-EM'_C index can make more exact evaluating,and has different correlations with number of papers,author's order et al. Co-authorship plays an important role in researcher's scientific assessment.
[Purpose/Significance]This article introduces a newindex,YC-EM' index,for more exact evaluating of authors influence.[Method/Process]This paper takes cooperation into consideration and names YC-EM'_Cindex based on EMindex and Year-Based H-indices. An empirical study has been made on 54 scientists' publication data,who are working in scientometrics and bibliometrics fields. The author discriminations,rankings,and correlations of YC-EM'_C index with other parameters are discussed in detailed.[Result/Conclusion]The research shows that YC-EM'_C index can make more exact evaluating,and has different correlations with number of papers,author's order et al. Co-authorship plays an important role in researcher's scientific assessment.
引文
[1]Hirsch J E.An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J].Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2005,102(46):16569-16572.
[2]Egghe L.Theory and practise of the g-index[J].Scientometrics,2006,69(1):131-152.
[3]Jin B,Liang L,Rousseau R,et al.The R-and AR-indices:Complementing the h-index[J].Chinese science bulletin,2007,52(6):855-863.
[4]Zhang C T.The e-index,complementing the h-index for excess citations[J].PLoS One,2009,4(5):e5429.
[5]Mahbuba D,Rousseau R.Year-based h-type indicators[J].Scientometrics,2013,96(3):785-797.
[6]Mahbuba D,Rousseau R.Newdefinitions and applications of Year-based h-indices[J].2016,10(2):321-332.
[7]Bihari A,Tripathi S.EM-index:A newmeasure to evaluate the scientific impact of scientists[J].Scientometrics,2017,112(1):659-677.
[8]Bihari A,Tripathi S.Year based EM-index:A newapproach to evaluate the scientific impact of scholars[J].Scientometrics,2018,114(4):1-31.
[9]陈敬宇.作者合作与时间因素视角下的作者影响力评估[J].情报杂志,2017,36(6):186-191.
[10]张勤.多维度量化科研人员影响力的指标---EMC指数[J].情报杂志,2018,37(2):122-128.
[11]Batista P D,Campiteli MG,Kinouchi O.Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?[J].Scientometrics,2006,68(1):179-189.
[12]Lindsey D.Production and citation measures in the sociology of science:The problem of multiple authorship[J].Social Studies of Science,1980,10(2):145-162.
[13]Price D D S.Multiple authorship[J].Science,1981,212(4498):986-986.
[14]Abbas A M.Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship[J].Scientometrics,2011,88(1):107-131.
[15]Egghe L,Rousseau R,Van Hooydonk G.Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries:Consequences for evaluation studies[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2000,51(2):145-157.
[16]Hagen N T.Harmonic allocation of authorship credit:Source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis[J].PLoS One,2008,3(12):e4021.
[17]Kim J,Diesner J.A network-based approach to co-authorship credit allocation[J].Scientometrics,2014,101(1):587-602.
[18]Shen H W,Barabsi A L.Collective credit allocation in science[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2014,111(34):12325-12330.
[2]Egghe L.Theory and practise of the g-index[J].Scientometrics,2006,69(1):131-152.
[3]Jin B,Liang L,Rousseau R,et al.The R-and AR-indices:Complementing the h-index[J].Chinese science bulletin,2007,52(6):855-863.
[4]Zhang C T.The e-index,complementing the h-index for excess citations[J].PLoS One,2009,4(5):e5429.
[5]Mahbuba D,Rousseau R.Year-based h-type indicators[J].Scientometrics,2013,96(3):785-797.
[6]Mahbuba D,Rousseau R.Newdefinitions and applications of Year-based h-indices[J].2016,10(2):321-332.
[7]Bihari A,Tripathi S.EM-index:A newmeasure to evaluate the scientific impact of scientists[J].Scientometrics,2017,112(1):659-677.
[8]Bihari A,Tripathi S.Year based EM-index:A newapproach to evaluate the scientific impact of scholars[J].Scientometrics,2018,114(4):1-31.
[9]陈敬宇.作者合作与时间因素视角下的作者影响力评估[J].情报杂志,2017,36(6):186-191.
[10]张勤.多维度量化科研人员影响力的指标---EMC指数[J].情报杂志,2018,37(2):122-128.
[11]Batista P D,Campiteli MG,Kinouchi O.Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?[J].Scientometrics,2006,68(1):179-189.
[12]Lindsey D.Production and citation measures in the sociology of science:The problem of multiple authorship[J].Social Studies of Science,1980,10(2):145-162.
[13]Price D D S.Multiple authorship[J].Science,1981,212(4498):986-986.
[14]Abbas A M.Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship[J].Scientometrics,2011,88(1):107-131.
[15]Egghe L,Rousseau R,Van Hooydonk G.Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries:Consequences for evaluation studies[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2000,51(2):145-157.
[16]Hagen N T.Harmonic allocation of authorship credit:Source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis[J].PLoS One,2008,3(12):e4021.
[17]Kim J,Diesner J.A network-based approach to co-authorship credit allocation[J].Scientometrics,2014,101(1):587-602.
[18]Shen H W,Barabsi A L.Collective credit allocation in science[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2014,111(34):12325-12330.