用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于小型蒸渗仪试验的潜在蒸散发估算方法评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Evaluation of Potential Evapotranspiration Estimation Method Based on Small Lysimeter Experiments
  • 作者:陈言 ; 鞠琴 ; 白玛旺堆 ; 鲁承阳 ; 郝振纯
  • 英文作者:CHEN Yan;JU Qin;Baimawangdui;LU Cheng-yang;HAO Zhen-chun;State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering,Hohai University;Linzhi Branch of the Tibet Autonomous Region Hydrology Bureau;Yellow River Ningmeng Hydrology Bureau;
  • 关键词:潜在蒸散发 ; 五道沟实验站 ; 蒸渗仪 ; 估算方法 ; Penman公式
  • 英文关键词:potential evapotranspiration;;Wudaogou experiment stations;;lysimeter;;estimation method;;Penman formula
  • 中文刊名:SDNY
  • 英文刊名:Water Resources and Power
  • 机构:河海大学水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室;西藏水文水资源勘测局林芝水文水资源分局;黄河宁蒙水文水资源局;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-25
  • 出版单位:水电能源科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.37;No.222
  • 基金:国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0402704);; 国家自然科学基金项目(51539003);; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2019B10914)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SDNY201902004
  • 页数:4
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:42-1231/TK
  • 分类号:20-23
摘要
为了更直接地揭示潜在蒸散发估算方法与实际潜在蒸散发的差异,基于淮北平原五道沟水文水资源实验站2014年8月1日至2015年8月31日的水文气象观测资料,计算Penman系列方法、P-T法、H-S法、FAO24Radiation法及Turc法7种蒸散发估算方法的估算结果,对比相应时间蒸渗仪试验实测潜在蒸散量,评价各模型在该地区的适用性。结果表明,Penman系列估算方法是估算五道沟地区潜在蒸散发最佳的方法,但7种方法均存在较大误差。FAO56P-M方法估算结果与实测值有相对最好的线性关系,但存在10%的低估倾向,同时夏季(6~8月)绝对误差较春秋季有所增加。Turc法及P-T法更适用于缺资料地区长周期潜在蒸散发估算,H-S法及FAO24Radiation法相对不适用于五道沟地区。
        Based on a lysimeter evapotranspiration experiment in Wudaogou hydrology and water resources experimental station,the observation potential evapotranspiration(ET0)from August 1,2014 to August 31,2015 was used to evaluate 7 ET0 calculation methods.These methods includes three kind of Penman methods(1948 Penman,FAO24 Penman,FAO56 Penman-Montieth),Priestley-Taylor,Hargreaves-Samani,FAO24 Radiation and Turc.The results indicate that Penman series methods performed best while there are big errors in all of the 7 estimation results.There is an optimal linear relationship between the observed potential evapotranspiration and the result estimated by FAO56 P-M method with 10% undervaluation.Meanwhile,FAO56 P-M method is more sensitive to meteorological condition in summer and winter.Turc method and P-T method are effective for long-term estimating with air temperature and radiation only.H-S method and FAO24 Radiation method are not suitable for Wudaogou area.
引文
[1] Xu C Y,Gong L b,Jiang T,et al.Analysis of Spa-tial Distribution and Temporal Trend of ReferenceEvapotranspiration and Pan Evaporation inChangjiang(Yangtze River)Catchment[J].Journalof Hydrology,2006,327(1-2):81-93.
    [2] SL13-2015,灌溉试验规范[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2015.
    [3] 李天生,夏军,匡洋,等.不同潜在蒸散发估算方法在汉江流域中上游地区的适用性研究[J].南水北调与水利科技,2017,15(6):1-10.
    [4] 徐俊增,彭世彰,丁加丽,等.基于蒸渗仪实测数据的日参考作物蒸发腾发量计算方法评价[J].水利学报,2010,41(12):1 497-1 505.
    [5] Doorenbos J,Pruitt W O.Guidelines for PredictingCrop Water Requirements[M].Irrigation and DrainagePaper No.24,FAO-ONU,Rome,Italy:1977.
    [6] Allen R G,Pereira L S,Raes D,et al.Cropevapor-transpiration:Guidelines for Computing Crop WaterRequirements[M].FAO Irrigation and Drainage,Paper No.56.Rame:Fod and Agriculture Organzia-tion of United Nations,1998.
    [7] George H.Hargreaves,Richard G Allen.History andEvaluation of Hargreaves Evapotranspiration Equation[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering,2003,129(1):53-63.
    [8] Irmak S,Allen R G,Whitty E B.Daily Grass andAlfalfa-Reference Evapotranspiration Estimates andAlfalfa-to-Grass Evapotranspiration Ratios in Flori-da[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineer-ing,2003,129(5):360-370.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700