生产能力禀赋与中国产业转型升级路径——基于产品空间理论的视角

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Production Capacity Endowment and Upgrading Path of China's Industrial Transformation:From the Perspective of Product Space Theory 作者：徐孝新 ; 李颢 英文作者：XU Xiao-xin;LI Hao;Xinyang Normal University;Institute of Economics of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences; 关键词：产品空间 ; 产品密度 ; 产品邻近度 ; 显性比较优势 英文关键词：product space;;product density;;product proximity;;revealed comparative advantage 中文刊名：DDCJ 英文刊名：Contemporary Finance & Economics 机构：信阳师范学院商学院;中国社会科学院经济研究所; 出版日期：2019-02-15 出版单位：当代财经 年：2019 期：No.411 基金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“共生理论视角下中国与‘一带一路’国家间产业转移模式与路径研究”(17ZD047);; 河南省社会科学规划项目“非上市国有企业信息披露水平、质量评价及提升路径研究”(2017BJJ050) 语种：中文; 页：DDCJ201902010 页数：10 CN：02 ISSN：36-1030/F 分类号：100-109

摘要

基于产品异质性和产品空间非均匀性特征,对中国产业升级路径进行实证研究。研究发现,生产能力禀赋对地区产业结构转型升级产生双重影响,在促进地区产业转型升级的同时也会遏制既有产业退出,但前者弱于后者。分区域来看,东部地区生产能力禀赋相对富足,在促进潜在产品升级和遏制优势产品退出中的作用均弱于中、西部地区,产业升级较多地通过"自我革命"和"创造性毁灭"过程实现跨越式升级;而生产能力禀赋相对较弱的中、西部地区,产业升级更多地遵循比较优势路径。因此,通过产业政策规划引领、完善市场退出机制和差异化区域升级路径,成为中国产业转型升级的必然选择。
        Based on such characteristics as product heterogeneity and product space non-uniformity,this paper conducts an empirical research on China's industrial upgrading path. The findings show that the production capacity endowment has a dual impact on the transformation and upgrading of the regional industrial structures; while promoting regional industrial upgrading, it will also curb the exit of the existing industries, but the former is weaker than the latter. In terms of regions, the production capacity endowment of the eastern region is relatively richer, and its role in promoting potential product upgrading and curbing the withdrawal of superior products is weaker than that of the central and western regions. The industrial upgrading is realized mostly through the process of" self-revolution" and" creative destruction". In the central and western regions where production capacity endowment is relatively weaker, industrial upgrading is more likely to follow the comparative advantage path. Therefore, in order to transform and upgrade its industries, it is inevitable for China to choose the path of being guided by industrial policy planning, improving market exit mechanism,and upgrading in different ways according to the regional conditions.

引文

[1]Dixit A. K., Stiglitz J. E.. Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity[J]. American Economic Review,1977, 67(3):297-308.
    [2]Hausmann R., Klinger B.. The Structural of the Product Space and the Evolution of Comparative Advantage[R]. CID Working Paper, No.142, 2007.
    [3]Hidalgo C. A., Klinger B., Barabási A. L., Hausmann R.. The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations[J].Science, 2007,317(7):482-487.
    [4]Hausmann R., Klinger B.. Structural Transformation and Patterns of Comparative Advantage in the Product Space[R].CID Working Paper, No.128, 2006.
    [5]Freitas M. L. D., Mamede R. P.. Stuctural Transformation of Portuguese Exports and the Role of Foreignowned Firms:A Descriptive Analysis for the Period 1995-2005[J]. Notas Económicas, 2011,33(6):20-43.
    [6]Khan M., Afzal U.. The Diversification and Sophistication of Pakistan’s Exports:The Need for Structural Transformation[J]. The Lahore Journal of Economics,2016,21(9):99-127.
    [7]Jung K.. The Interaction between China, Japan, and Korea in the Export Market[J]. Kdi Journal of Economic Policy,2016,38(2):45-62.
    [8]张其仔,李颢.中国产业升级机会的甄别[J].中国工业经济,2013,(5):44-56.
    [9]邓向荣,曹红.产业升级路径选择:遵循抑或偏离比较优势——基于产品空间结构的实证分析[J].中国工业经济,2016,(2):52-67.
    [10]张亭,刘林青.中美产业升级的路径选择比较——基于产品空间理论的分析[J].经济管理,2016,(8):18-28.
    [11]马海燕,刘林青.产品密度、模仿同构与产业升级——基于产品空间视角[J].国际贸易问题,2018,(8):24-37.
    [12]Kali R., Reyes J., Mc Gee J., Shirrell S.. Growth Networks[J]. Journal of Development Economics,2013,101(3):216-227.
    [13]Balassa B.. Trade Liberalisation and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage[J]. Manchester School, 1965,33(2):99-123.
    (1)本文东部地区包括10个省级行政区,分别是北京、天津、辽宁、上海、江苏、浙江、福建、山东、广东和海南;中部地区9个,分别是山西、吉林、黑龙江、安徽、江西、河北、河南、湖北、湖南;西部地区12个,分别是四川、重庆、贵州、云南、西藏、陕西、甘肃、青海、宁夏、新疆、广西、内蒙古。