强制技术转移、适应性熟化与创新溢出效应——来自中国工业的经验分析
|
摘要
构建了一个强制技术转移和适应性熟化影响创新溢出效应的模型,利用2000～2016年间中国工业分布滞后面板数据估计了强制技术转移和适应性熟化对创新溢出效应的影响。研究发现:强制技术转移并不能有效地提升中国工业的创新能力,对中国工业创新溢出的改善作用不显著;适应性熟化提升了中国工业吸收核心技术的能力,对中国工业的创新溢出效应具有显著的正向作用。
The paper builds a model which shows influence from compulsory technology transfer and adaptive ripening to innovation spillover effect.Using China industry distributed lag panel data of 2000～2016,the paper estimates the influence from compulsory technology transfer and adaptive ripening to innovation spillover effect.Result shows that compulsory technology transfer can't improve the innovation ability of China industry.It has unremarkably positive effect to innovation spillover of China industry.Adaptive ripening improves China industry's absorbing ability for core technology.It has remarkably positive effect to innovation spillover effect of China industry.
The paper builds a model which shows influence from compulsory technology transfer and adaptive ripening to innovation spillover effect.Using China industry distributed lag panel data of 2000～2016,the paper estimates the influence from compulsory technology transfer and adaptive ripening to innovation spillover effect.Result shows that compulsory technology transfer can't improve the innovation ability of China industry.It has unremarkably positive effect to innovation spillover of China industry.Adaptive ripening improves China industry's absorbing ability for core technology.It has remarkably positive effect to innovation spillover effect of China industry.
引文
[1]Seifert J.Welfare Effects of Compulsory Licensing[J].Journal of Regulatory Economics,2015,48(3):317-350.
[2]Petruzzelli A M,Ardito L,Savino T.Maturity of Knowledge Inputs and Innovation Value:The Moderating Effect of Firm Age and Size[J].Journal of Business Research,2018(86):190-201.
[3]Branstetter L G,Fisman R,Foley C F.Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer?Empirical Evidence from U.S.Firm-Level Panel Data[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,2006,121(1):321-349.
[4]Dinopoulos E,Segerstrom P.Intellectual Property Rights,Multinational Firms and Economic Growth[J].Journal of Development Economics,2010,92(1):13-27.
[5]李海波,韩爱华.技术转移、异质特征与自主创新的实证研究[J].统计与决策,2017(24):170-174.
[6]Bozeman B,Rimes H,Youtie J.The Evolving State-ofthe-Art in Technology Transfer Research:Revisiting the Contingent Effectiveness Model[J].Research Policy,2015,44(1):34-49.
[7]刘克寅,宣勇,池仁勇.企业创新管理中内、外部R&D投入的互补性研究——基于中国大中型工业企业的数据分析[J].科研管理,2015,36(4):11-21.
[8]顾振华,沈瑶.知识产权保护、技术创新与技术转移——基于发展中国家的视角[J].产业经济研究,2015(3):64-73.
[9]Adner R,Helfat C E.Corporate Effects and Dynamic Managerial Capabilities[J].Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(10):1011-1025.
[10]Liao S H,Chen C C,Hu D C,et al.Developing a Sustainable Competitive Advantage:Absorptive Capacity, Knowledge Transfer and Organizational Learning[J].Journal of Technology Transfer,2017,42(6):1431-1450.
[11]宋林,郭玉晶.创新驱动发展战略下中国技术进步的路径选择[J].经济学家,2016(4):63-70.
[12]沈坤荣,傅元海.外资技术转移与内资经济增长质量——基于中国区域面板数据的检验[J].中国工业经济,2010(11):5-15.
[13]Markman G D,Gianiodis P T,Phan P H,et al.Innovation Speed:Transferring University Technology to Market[J].Research Policy,2005,34(7):1058-1075.
[14]Llor A.Delay from Patent Filing to Technology Transfer:A Statistical Study at a Major Public Research Organization[J].Technovation,2007,27(8):446-460.
[15]陈琨,李晓轩,杨国梁.中外大学技术转移效率比较研究——基于DEA-Malmquist方法[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(7):98-106.
[16]Goya E,VayáE,Surilach J.Innovation Spillovers and Firm Performance:Micro Evidence from Spain(2004~2009)[J].Journal of Productivity Analysis,2016,45(1):1-22.
[17]郭庆旺,贾俊雪.中国潜在产出与产出缺口的估算[J].经济研究,2004(5):31-39.
[18]郭庆旺,贾俊雪.中国全要素生产率的估算:1979~2004[J].经济研究,2005(6):51-60.
[19]Marengo L,Valente M.Industry Dynamics in Complex Product Spaces:An Evolutionary Model[J].Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,2010,21(1):5-16.
(1)本文利用引进美国技术费用占技术合同金额比重衡量技术获取效率。
(2)限于篇幅,本文未报告稳健性估计结果,感兴趣的读者可向作者索要。
[2]Petruzzelli A M,Ardito L,Savino T.Maturity of Knowledge Inputs and Innovation Value:The Moderating Effect of Firm Age and Size[J].Journal of Business Research,2018(86):190-201.
[3]Branstetter L G,Fisman R,Foley C F.Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer?Empirical Evidence from U.S.Firm-Level Panel Data[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,2006,121(1):321-349.
[4]Dinopoulos E,Segerstrom P.Intellectual Property Rights,Multinational Firms and Economic Growth[J].Journal of Development Economics,2010,92(1):13-27.
[5]李海波,韩爱华.技术转移、异质特征与自主创新的实证研究[J].统计与决策,2017(24):170-174.
[6]Bozeman B,Rimes H,Youtie J.The Evolving State-ofthe-Art in Technology Transfer Research:Revisiting the Contingent Effectiveness Model[J].Research Policy,2015,44(1):34-49.
[7]刘克寅,宣勇,池仁勇.企业创新管理中内、外部R&D投入的互补性研究——基于中国大中型工业企业的数据分析[J].科研管理,2015,36(4):11-21.
[8]顾振华,沈瑶.知识产权保护、技术创新与技术转移——基于发展中国家的视角[J].产业经济研究,2015(3):64-73.
[9]Adner R,Helfat C E.Corporate Effects and Dynamic Managerial Capabilities[J].Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(10):1011-1025.
[10]Liao S H,Chen C C,Hu D C,et al.Developing a Sustainable Competitive Advantage:Absorptive Capacity, Knowledge Transfer and Organizational Learning[J].Journal of Technology Transfer,2017,42(6):1431-1450.
[11]宋林,郭玉晶.创新驱动发展战略下中国技术进步的路径选择[J].经济学家,2016(4):63-70.
[12]沈坤荣,傅元海.外资技术转移与内资经济增长质量——基于中国区域面板数据的检验[J].中国工业经济,2010(11):5-15.
[13]Markman G D,Gianiodis P T,Phan P H,et al.Innovation Speed:Transferring University Technology to Market[J].Research Policy,2005,34(7):1058-1075.
[14]Llor A.Delay from Patent Filing to Technology Transfer:A Statistical Study at a Major Public Research Organization[J].Technovation,2007,27(8):446-460.
[15]陈琨,李晓轩,杨国梁.中外大学技术转移效率比较研究——基于DEA-Malmquist方法[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(7):98-106.
[16]Goya E,VayáE,Surilach J.Innovation Spillovers and Firm Performance:Micro Evidence from Spain(2004~2009)[J].Journal of Productivity Analysis,2016,45(1):1-22.
[17]郭庆旺,贾俊雪.中国潜在产出与产出缺口的估算[J].经济研究,2004(5):31-39.
[18]郭庆旺,贾俊雪.中国全要素生产率的估算:1979~2004[J].经济研究,2005(6):51-60.
[19]Marengo L,Valente M.Industry Dynamics in Complex Product Spaces:An Evolutionary Model[J].Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,2010,21(1):5-16.
(1)本文利用引进美国技术费用占技术合同金额比重衡量技术获取效率。
(2)限于篇幅,本文未报告稳健性估计结果,感兴趣的读者可向作者索要。