用户名: 密码: 验证码:
Validation of the Diagnostic Value of NMP22® BladderChek® Test as a Marker for Bladder Cancer by Photodynamic Diagnosis
详细信息查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
摘要
>Objectives

The aim of the present study was to validate the sensitivity and specificity of the new “point-of-care” NMP22® BladderChek® test compared to photodynamic diagnosis (PDD).

Methods

Voided urine samples from 100 patients with suspicion of bladder cancer were collected to perform the NMP22® BladderChek® test and voided urinary cytology. The nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) levels were measured by a lateral flow immunochromatographic qualitative assay, using 10 U/ml as the cut-off value. Subsequently patients underwent PDD, using 5-aminolevulinic acid or hexyl-aminolevulinate; previous bladder washings for cytology were collected. Sensitivity and specificity of the NMP22® BladderChek® test were compared with cytology and PDD.

Results

Forty of the 100 patients had urothelial malignancies (22 pTa, 4 pT1, 3 pT2, 9 carcinoma in situ, 2 pTx; 16 G1, 6 G2, 18 G3). The sensitivity was 65%for the NMP22® BladderChek® test, 44%for voided cytology, 75%for washing cytology, and 93%for PDD. Specificity rates were 40%, 78%, 62%, and 43%, respectively. Positive predictive values were 0.42, 0.58, 0.53, and 0.52 and the negative predictive values 0.63, 0.68, 0.82, and 0.9, respectively.

Conclusions

The results demonstrate that the NMP22® BladderChek® is an easily applied test, giving diagnostic findings within 30 min. However, validated by the highly sensitive PDD, the NMP22® BladderChek® test demonstrates poor specificity and sensitivity and, therefore, cannot be recommended for screening or surveillance in daily clinical routine use. Further studies with careful patient selection are necessary to identify the patient population that might benefit from the NMP22® BladderChek® test.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700