Michael Huemer’s A Priori Defense of Metaethical Internalism

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Sanford Levy
• 关键词：Huemer ; Internalism ; Externalism ; Principle of charity
• 刊名：Philosophia
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：December 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：43
• 期：4
• 页码：1067-1080
• 全文大小：313 KB
• 参考文献：Brink, D. (1989). Moral realism and the foundations of ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
  Dennett, D. (2007). Breaking the spell. London: Penguin.
  Gazzaniga, M. S. (1985). The social brain. New York: Basic Books.
  Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Moral intuition = Fast and frugal heuristics? In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology volume 2, the cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.CrossRef
  Hare, R. M. (1963). Freedom and reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
  Hare, R. M. (1981). Moral thinking: Its levels, methods and point. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRef
  Harman, G. (1975). Moral relativism defended. The Philosophical Review, 84(1), 3–22.CrossRef
  Henderson, D. (1987). The principle of charity and the problem of irrationality. Synthese, 73, 225–252.CrossRef
  Huemer, M. (2005). Ethical intuitionism. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
  Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast, thinking slow. New York: Narrar, Straus and Giroux.
  Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  Olivola, C., & Todorov, A. (2010). Elected in 100 milliseconds: appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 83–110.CrossRef
  Prinz, J. (2007). The emotional construction of morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  Stevenson, C. (1937). The emotive meaning of ethical terms. Mind, 46, 14–31.CrossRef
  Stevenson, C. (1963). The nature of ethical disagreement. In Facts and values (pp. 1–9). New Haven: Yale University Press.
  Stich, S. (1985). Could man be an irrational animal? Some notes on the epistemology of rationality. Synthese, 64(1), 115–135.CrossRef
  Thagard, P., & Nisbett, R. (1983). Rationality and charity. Philosophy of Science, 50(2), 250–267.CrossRef
  Warren, M. A. (1973). On the moral and legal status of abortion. The Monist, 57, 43–61.CrossRef
  Webster, J. M., Kaushik, G. B., & McConkey, G. (2013). Toxoplasma gondii infection, from predation to schizophrenia: can animal behavior help us understand human behaviour. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 216, 99–122.CrossRef
  Zimmer, C. (2014). Parasites practicing mind control. http://​www.​nytimes.​com/​2014/​08/​28/​science/​parasites-practicing-mind-control.​html . Accessed 3 Dec 2014.
  
• 作者单位：Sanford Levy (1)
  
  1. Department of History and Philosophy, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, 59717, USA
  
• 刊物主题：Philosophy; Epistemology; Ethics; Philosophy of Language; Philosophy of Mind; Philosophy of Science;
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1574-9274

文摘

Versions of internalism have played important roles in metaethics, for example, in defending irrealist options such as emotivism. However, internalism is itself as controversial as the views it is used to defend. Standard approaches to testing the view, such as thought experiments about amoralists, have failed to gain consensus. Michael Huemer offers a defense of internalism of a different kind which he calls the “argument from interpretation.” He presents the argument as one Humeans could embrace, but versions could be accepted by others, including Huemer himself. The argument begins from the assumption that a certain principle of charity is true and knowable a priori. But it can only be known a priori if internalism is true. Hence internalism is true. In this paper I argue that this important argument fails. My main objection makes use of recent work in empirical psychology. Huemer needs the principle of charity to be known a priori. I argue that rather than being an a priori issue, it is an empirical one and that the empirical evidence is strong enough to undermine his argument for internalism. Keywords Huemer Internalism Externalism Principle of charity