Role of (NO)2 Dimer in Reactions of Fe+ with NO and NO2 Studied by ICP-SIFT Mass Spectrometry

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Voislav Blagojevic ; Michael J. Y. Jarvis ; Gregory K. Koyanagi ; Diethard K. Bohme
• 刊名：The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：May 9, 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：117
• 期：18
• 页码：3786-3790
• 全文大小：268K
• 年卷期：v.117,no.18(May 9, 2013)
• ISSN：1520-5215

文摘

In a recent publication by J. J. Melko et al. (J. Phys. Chem. A2012, 116, 11500鈥?1508) on the reactions of Fe⁺ cations with NO and NO₂, these authors made a number of assertions regarding the work previously published in our laboratory. Melko et al. assert that our previously reported data was erroneously analyzed, resulting in our misreporting of the Fe⁺ + NO₂ reaction branching ratio for NO⁺. Also, they proposed that this alleged misreporting made it likely for the second-order chemistry observed in our Fe⁺ + NO experiments to be a product of an impurity of NO₂ in our NO reagent and, furthermore, that our reported rate coefficient for the effective second-order chemistry was unreasonably high on the basis of their model calculations. Despite extensive private communications in which we presented detailed data supporting our original data analysis to Melko et al., these authors proceeded to publish their critique without any reference to this data. Here, we present the data communicated by us to Melko et al. and show that our result reported earlier for the Fe⁺ + NO₂ reaction branching ratio to form NO⁺ is accurate and, furthermore, that there is no evidence for a sufficient NO₂ impurity in any of our NO experiments. We suggest that the discrepancy in the results observed by us and Melko et al. may be attributed to a reaction with the dimer (NO)₂. This possibility was dismissed in our earlier work as the dimer concentration under the flow tube conditions was calculated to be below 10^鈥?% of the monomer, but the new results of J. J. Melko et al. raise the dimer reaction as a real possibility. Finally, J. J. Melko et al. appear to have misunderstood the mechanism of the second-order NO chemistry that we had proposed.