The effects of gap disturbance on the seedling emergence, survival and growth of two different native species in Inner Mongolia

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Haiming Kan^a ; ^{kanhaiming@hotmail.com} ; Juying Wu^a ; ^{wujuying@263.net} ; Yingjun Zhang^b ; Guixia Liu^c
• 关键词：Reseeding management ; Restoration ecology ; Gap disturbance ; Gap size
• 刊名：Acta Ecologica Sinica
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：February 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：37
• 期：1
• 页码：38-47
• 全文大小：762 K
• 卷排序：37

文摘

A field study was conducted to investigate the effects of gap disturbance on the seedling establishment process of two native species. Seeds of Agropyron cristatum and Stipa krylovii were reseeded to artificially created gaps in a degraded steppe in North China. There were seven treatments: shoot gaps and root gaps (10 cm, 20 cm and 40 cm in diameters), no gaps (control). Shoot gaps were formed by removing above ground vegetation and below ground biomass without restricting the re-growth of neighbor roots back into the gap. The root gaps were accomplished by using polyvinyl chloride pipes sunk in the soil of shoot gaps to exclude neighboring roots. Seedling emergence, survival and growth performance after 90 days of growing were recorded for both species. Gap significantly increased soil moisture, especially for root gaps. Emergence increased significantly for both species as gap size increased. Seedling emergence and survivorship of both species were greater in gaps than in controls. However, the gap size showed a significantly negative effect on Agropyron cristatum's survivorship. Growth performance of Agropyron cristatum and Stipa krylovii differ in their response to gap disturbance. Gap had positive effects on seedling growth (including seedling height, dry weight, and numbers of tillers and leaves) of Stipa krylovii, but had negative effects on seedling growth of Agropyron cristatum. The two species have significantly different responses to gap disturbance. All results suggest that Stipa krylovii is a gap-enhanced species, and Agropyron cristatum is not. Predation by insects may be one of the key reasons to explain the stand dominance in this grassland.